Obama’s Science Czar Considered Forced Abortions, Sterilization as Population Growth Solutions

07drenPresident Obama’s “science czar,” John Holdren, once floated the idea of forced abortions, “compulsory sterilization,” and the creation of a “Planetary Regime” that would oversee human population levels and control all natural resources as a means of protecting the planet. Yes this is the same guy in my April 9th post Obama Cooling Air To Fight Global Warming.

To you Obama Kool Aid Drinkers and Obama Dust Sniffers let me warn you, Obama has picked some of the wackest wack job to run this country. John Holdren ideas on population control include forcing single women to abort their babies or put them up for adoption; implanting sterilizing capsules in people when they reach puberty; and spiking water reserves and staple foods with a chemical that would make people sterile, and you want Obama Administration to pass a Healtcare Reform Bill. This information is in the book Holdren co-authored in 1977 called, “Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment,” this was brought up at his confirmation hearings, so Obama knows how Holdren thinks.

Click here to see the passage on sterilizing women

Click here for the full section on “Involuntary Fertility Control”

This book discusses measures to curb population growth, which it says could cause an environmental catastrophe. If you look at how Obama handled the Swine Flu panic you will have an idea on how Obama’s administration will handle every headache that enters the medical system, and with the thinkings of Holdern Obama may consider his plans, remember (CHANGE).  All this was in a discussion of possible government programs that could be used to lower birth rates. If you look at the speeches Obama has given at Fathers Day and the recent NAACP Anniversery it makes me wonder, could Obama go this far if Holdren start whispering population control in those ears.

We know Obama will not rule out taxpayer funding for abortions in a national health care bill and will consider funding abortions, this is a battle going on now in the House and Senate. Holdren and the Ehrlichs offer ideas for “coercive,” “involuntary fertility control,” including “a program of sterilizing women after their second or third child,” which doctors would be expected to do right after a woman gives birth.

Holdren has stated that he does not now support and has never supported compulsory abortions, compulsory sterilization, or other coercive approaches to limiting population growth. Holdren you co-authored the book. Just like many of Obama’s choices once they are exposed they start to deny the statements.

    • Navas
    • July 24th, 2009

    Here are the keyords in the essay:

    13th Amendment, 14th Amendment, 2012 Election, B.E.T., Barack Hussein Obama, Booker T. Washington, Bryant Park, Cipriani’s, Colin Powell, Criminal Industrial Complex, Deb Slott, Do The Right Thing, Heidi Klum, Hip-Hop, Mark Penn, Melting Pot, Pink Elephant, Racism, Reconstruction, Robert Johnson, Seal, Segregation, Shelby Steele, Sidney Poiter, Sonia Sotomayor, Spike Lee, Tavis Smiley, Terrence Yang, The Dance Flick, To Kill a Mocking Bird, Virginia Davies, W.E.B. Dubois, Zero Mostel, Politics

    Prologue to Obama 2012

    We approach the future walking backwards, our gaze forever fixated on the past. Predicting the future is not a passive exercise; we invent it every day with our actions.

    I began the sketches for what would ultimately become Obama 2012 in March 2007, a month after Barack Obama declared his candidacy. I had spent much of the previous 18 months living abroad as an entrepreneur and statesman of sorts, and I was slightly out of touch with the pulse of life on the street in the United States. I learnt about Sen. Barack Obama’s Springfield, IL speech formally declaring his candidacy for president of the United States through one of the international cable news channels and thought how great it would be to have a fresh start after years of mediocrity in Washington and a plummeting reputation around the world.

    By September, after what seemed like raising a six-month-old child, my sketches had turned into Why the Democrats Will Win in 2008 the Road to an Obama White House. It was my answer to the burning question everyone had back in March: Can he really win? Actually, not everyone thought it was a question. For many people, including Mark Penn, director of the Clinton campaign, the answer was an easy “no way.” This strategic blunder made it that much easier for the Clinton campaign to be defeated. Then there were Black pundits like Shelby Steele, a fellow at the Hoover Institution, who came out with a 2007 book entitled A Bound Man, Why Obama Can’t Win.

    Being Black did seem to be an automatic disqualification, but then why did someone need to write an entire book arguing what should have been patently obvious? Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Colin Powell came to my mind and I remembered that he could have run for president in 1992 as a war hero. But Colin Powell was Ronald Reagan’s protégé and got a special pass on the race question. Black conservatives like Justice Thomas, Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell were careful to disassociate themselves from liberal thinkers and activists like Jesse Jackson, who lost, as expected, the 1984 and 1988 Democratic primaries. Ultimately, Colin Powell, in spite of all his honors, declined to run for president. His wife Alma feared for his safety. Common sense said that a candidate like Obama, for numerous insurmountable reasons, didn’t stand a chance of winning the Democratic primary, let alone a general election in which 10% of the electorate is African American and Republicans controlled the White House for 20 of the preceding 28 years. But I decided that Obama’s chances merited a closer examination. In it, I would bring to bear my gambling skills.

    • emptysuit
    • July 28th, 2009

    Navas, thanks for that essay snip. Don’t be a stranger.

  1. charming post. simply one unimportant where I quarrel with it. I am emailing you in detail.

  2. New essay “The Gates Affair:Why We Care” yours to publish
    Dear readers and webmasters,

    Author Daniel Bruno Sanz has written an essay about Gatesgate. We encourage its publication and distribution.

    Regards,

    Navas S.

    “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

    – 4th Amendment to the The Constitution of the United States of America

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Comments are closed.