Posts Tagged ‘ nuclear ’

Medvedev Interviewed By Stephanopoulos

Join Emptysuit On Twitter

Click On Links:
Russia And U.S. Nuclear Treaty
Transcript: Barack Obama And Dmitry Medvedev Nuclear Treaty
Barack Obama And Dmitry Medvedev Sign Nuclear Treaty

Video Of Cilivians Killed In Iraq (warning graphic video)
Iraqi Patrol Vehicle Hit By IED (warning graphic video)

History Of Iran And USA
Ahmadinejad Tells Obama, Get Some Experience
The House Negro And The Field Negro
About Emptysuit
Hillary Clinton Warned America About Obama

Iran Test Medium Range Missle
Obama Call For Spending Freezes
Summary Of The Defense Appropriation Bill
2011 Budget Summary
2011 Budget Terminations, Reductions And Savings
Iran Marks 31st Anniversary Of Islamic Revolution
Liberal’s Anti-War Hypocrisy.?
Bush Billboard, Miss Me Yet?

Russia And U.S. Nuclear Treaty

PROTOCOL TO THE TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON MEASURES FOR THE FURTHER REDUCTION AND LIMITATION OF STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE ARMS

Pursuant to Article I of the Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, hereinafter referred to as the Treaty, the Parties hereby agree upon the following provisions regarding implementation of the Treaty.

This Protocol is organized into ten Parts.

Part One, Terms and Their Definitions, contains the definitions of terms that are used in the Treaty and this Protocol.

Part Two, Categories of Data Pertaining to Strategic Offensive Arms, contains the categories of data with respect to items subject to the Treaty.

Part Three, Conversion or Elimination Procedures, contains procedures governing the conversion, elimination, or other means for removal from accountability of strategic offensive arms and facilities.

Part Four, Notifications, contains the iist of notifications provided for in Article VII of the Treaty.

Part Five, Inspection Activities, contains provisions governing the conduct of inspection activities provided for in Article XI of the Treaty.

Part Six, Bilateral Consultative Commission, hereinafter referred to as the BCC, contains provisions governing the operation of the BCC, established pursuant to Article XI1 of
the Treaty.

Part Seven, Telemetric Information, contains the procedures associated with the fulfillment of obligations concerning telemetric information, pursuant to Article IX of the Treaty.

Part Eight, Provisional Application, governs provisional application of certain provisions of the Treaty and this Protocol.

Part Nine, Agreed Statements, contains Agreed Statements regarding the Treaty and this Protocol.

Part Ten, Final Provisions, contains general provisions applicable to this Protocol.

PART ONE -TERMS AND THEIR DEFINITIONS

For the purposes of the Treaty and this Protocol:

1. (1.) The term “air base” means a facility at which deployed heavy bombers are based and their operation is supported.
2. (23.) The term “aircraft” means any manned machine that can derive support in the atmosphere from interaction with the air other than the interaction of the air with the Earth’s surface.
3. (86.) The term “aircrew member” means an individual who performs duties related to the operation of an airplane and who is included on the inspecting Party’s list of aircrew members.
4. (22.) The term “air-launched cruise missile” or “ALCM” means an air-to-surface cruise missile of a type, any one of which has been flight-tested from an aircraft or deployed on a bomber after December 31, 1986.
5. (70.) The term “airplane” means a power-driven, heavier- than-air aircraft that derives its lift in flight chiefly from aerodynamic reactions on surfaces that remain fixed under given conditions of flight.
6. (5.) The term “ballistic missile” means a missile that is a weapon-delivery vehicle that has a ballistic trajectory over most of its flight path. ( ) The number in parenthesis is the number in the Russian text.
7. (69.) The term “basing area” means an area within an ICBM base for mobile launchers of ICBMs, in which deployed mobile launchers of ICBMs are based and in which fixed structures for mobile launchers of ICBMs are located.
8. (9.) The term “bomber” means an airplane of a type, any one of which was initially constructed or later converted to be equipped for bombs or air-to-surface missiles.
9. (32.) The term “conversion or elimination facility” means:
(a) For ICBMs or SLBMs, a specified facility for the elimination of ICBMs, SLBMs, and launch canisters;
(b) For mobile launchers of ICBMs, a specified facility for the conversion or elimination of mobile launchers of ICBMs;
(c) For SLBM launchers, a specified facility for the conversion or elimination of SLBM launchers;
(d) For heavy bombers, a specified facility for the conversion of heavy bombers, or the elimination of heavy bombers.
10. (21.) The term ‘cruise missile” means a missile that is an unmanned, self-propelled weapon-delivery vehicle that sustains flight through the use of aerodynamic lift over most of its flight path.
11. (14.) The term “declared data” means, for the data the accuracy of which is confirmed during inspection activities:
(a) Data with respect to items subject to the Treaty, specified according to categories of data contained in Part Two of this Protocol;
(b) Data included in notifications provided in accordance with Part Four of this Protocol that update the data according to categories of data contained in Part Two of this Protocol;
(c) Information on technical characteristics of new types of strategic offensive arms included in notifications provided in accordance with Part Four of this Protocol that update the data according to categories of data contained in Part Two of this Protocol, and that have been confirmed during exhibitions; and
(d) Information that the inspected Party provides to inspection teams during pre-inspection procedures.
12. (67.) The term “deployed heavy bomber” means a heavy bomber equipped for nuclear armaments, other than a test heavy bomber or a heavy bomber located at a repair facility or at a production facility.
13. (63.) The term “deployed ICBM” means an ICBM that is contained in or on a deployed launcher of ICBMs.
14. (66.) The term “deployed launcher of ICBMs” means an ICBM launcher that contains an ICBM and is not an ICBM test launcher, an ICBM training launcher, or an ICBM launcher located at a space launch facility.
15. (65.) The term “deployed launcher of SLBMs” means an SLBM launcher installed on a submarine that has been launched, that contains an SLBM, and is not intended for testing or training.
16. (64.) The term “deployed mobile launcher of ICBMs” means a mobile launcher of ICBMs that contains an ICBM and is not a mobile test launcher or a mobile launcher of ICBMs located at a space launch facility.
17. (62.) The term “deployed SLBM” means an SLBM that is contained in a deployed launcher of SLBMs.
18. (46.) The term “distinguishable” means different on the basis of the totality of external and functional differences that are observable by national technical means of verification, or, when such observations may be inconclusive in the opinion of the inspecting Party, that are visible during inspection activities.
19. (11.) The term “each year” means during a period of 12 months commencing on the date of entry into force of the Treaty or on an anniversary of that date.
20. (43.) The term “facility” means an ICBM base, submarine base, air base, maintenance facility, basing area, silo launcher group, ICBM loading facility, SLBM loading facility,
production facility, repair facility, storage facility, training facility, conversion or elimination facility, test range, heavy bomber flight test center, or space launch facility.
21. (74.) The term “fixed structure for mobile launchers of ICBMs” means a unique structure, within a basing area, designed to contain mobile launchers of ICBMs.
22. (12.) The term “front section” means that portion of the payload of the final stage that contains the reentry vehicle or reentry vehicles and may, depending on design, include a platform for a reentry vehicle or reentry vehicles, penetration aids, and a shroud.
23. (80.) The term “heavy bomber” means a bomber of a type, any one of which satisfies either of the following criteria:
(a) Its range is greater than 8000 kilometers; or
(b) It is equipped for long-range nuclear ALCMs. A bomber shall not be considered to be a heavy bomber if it meets neither criterion (a) nor criterion (b) or if otherwise agreed by the Parties.
24. (81.) The term “heavy bomber equipped for non-nuclear armaments” means a heavy bomber that is not equipped for long- range nuclear ALCMs, nuclear air-to-surface missiles, or nuclear bombs.
25. (82.) The term “heavy bomber equipped for nuclear armaments” means a heavy bomber equipped for long-range nuclear ALCMs, nuclear air-to-surface missiles, or nuclear bombs.
26. (85.) The term “heavy bomber flight test center” means a facility, other than a production facility for heavy bombers, at which test heavy bombers are based and their operation is supported.
27. (3.) The term ‘ICBM base” means:
(a) For mobile launchers of ICBMs, an area in which one or more basing areas and one associated maintenance facility are located;
(b) For silo launchers of ICBMs, an area in which one or more groups of silo launchers of ICBMs and one associated maintenance facility are located.
28. (56.) The term “ICBM launcher” means a device intended or used to contain, prepare for launch, and launch an ICBM.
29. (27.) The term “ICBM loading facility” means a facility, outside an ICBM base and outside a test range, where ICBMs for mobile launchers of ICBMs are loaded onto or unloaded from mobile launchers of ICBMs.
30. (24.) The term “in-country escort” means a group of individuals designated by the inspected Party to accompany and assist inspectors and aircrew members throughout the in- country period.
31. (48.) The term “in-country period” means the period of time from the arrival of the inspection team or aircrew members at the point of entry until their departure from the country through the point of entry.
32. (17.) The term “inspection activities” means inspections and exhibitions.
33. (30.) The term “inspection activity site” means a location at which inspections or exhibitions may be conducted.
34. (29.) The term “inspection site” means a location at which Type One or Type Two inspections may be conducted.
35. (16.) The term “inspection team” means the group of inspectors assigned by the inspecting Party to conduct a particular inspection activity.
36. (15.) The term “inspector” means an individual specified by one of the Parties to conduct inspection activities and included on that Party’s list of inspectors.
37. (25.) The term “intercontinental ballistic missile” or “ICBM” means a land-based ballistic missile with a range in excess of 5500 kilometers.
38. (54.) The term “launch” means the initial motion and subsequent flight of an ICBM or SLBM.
39. (61.) The term “launch canister” means a container, directly associated with an ICBM or SLBM, that can be or has been used for transporting and storing an assembled ICBM or SLBM, with or without its front section, and from which an ICBM or SLBM can be or has been launched.
40. (60.) The term “launcher of missile defense interceptors” means a device intended or used to contain, prepare for launch, and launch missile defense interceptors.
41. (20.) The term “long-range ALCM” means an ALCM with a range in excess of 600 kilometers.
42. (89.) The term “long-range nuclear ALCM” means a long- range ALCM that is nuclear-armed.
43. (44.) The term “maintenance facility” means a facility that is part of an ICBM base and at which ICBMs and ICBM launchers are maintained and their operation is supported.
44. (52.) The term “missile defense interceptor” means a missile that was developed, tested, and deployed in order to intercept ICBMs, SLBMs, or their reentry vehicles.
45. (35.) The term “mobile launcher of ICBMs” means an erector-launcher mechanism for launching ICBMs and the self- propelled device on which it is mounted.
46. (42.) The term “new typeu1 means, for ICBMs or SLBMs, a type of ICBM or a type of SLBM, the technical characteristics of which differ from the technical characteristics of an ICBM or SLBM, respectively, of each type declared previously in at least one of the following respects:
(a) Number of stages.
(b) Type of propellant of any stage.
(c) Either the length of the assembled missile without front section or the length of the first stage, by more than three percent.
(d) Diameter of the first stage, by more than three percent.
47. (41.) The term “non-deployed heavy bomber” means a test heavy bomber or a heavy bomber equipped for nuclear armaments located at a repair facility or at a production facility.
48. (37.) The term “non-deployed ICBM” means an ICBM not contained in a deployed launcher of ICBMs or on a deployed launcher of ICBMs.
49. (40.) The term “non-deployed launcher of ICBMs” means an ICBM test launcher, an ICBM training launcher, an ICBM launcher located at a space launch facility, or an ICBM launcher, other than a soft-site launcher, that does not contain a deployed ICBM.
50. (39.) The term “non-deployed launcher of SLBMs” means an SLBM launcher, other than a soft-site launcher, that is intended for testing or training, or an SLBM launcher that does not contain a deployed SLBM.
51. (38.) The term “non-deployed mobile launcher of ICBMs” means a mobile launcher of ICBMs that does not contain an ICBM, or a mobile test launcher of ICBMs, or a mobile launcher of ICBMs located at a space launch facility, unless otherwise agreed by the Parties.
52. (36.) The term “non-deployed SLBM” means an SLBM not contained in a deployed launcher of SLBMs.
53. (90.) The term “nuclear armaments” means, for heavy bombers, long-range nuclear ALCMs, nuclear air-to-surface missiles, or nuclear bombs.
54. (71.) The term “Open Skies airplane” means an airplane performing an observation flight in accordance with the Open Skies Treaty of March 24, 1992, that is simultaneously used for transporting an inspection team to or from a point of entry on the territory of the inspected Party.
55. (47.) The term “period of inspection activities” means, for an inspection or exhibition, the period of time from the completion of pre-inspection procedures until the commencement of post-inspection procedures.
56. (51.) The term “produce” means build, construct, or manufacture in any quantity, and includes serial production as well as one-of-a-kind manufacturing.
57. (45.) The term “production facility” means:
(a) For ICBMs or SLBMs, a facility at which:
(i) ICBMs or SLBMs that are maintained, stored, and transported as assembled missiles in their launch canisters, are assembled, including the joining of all stages of such missiles and the loading of such missiles into launch canisters.
(ii) ICBMs or SLBMs that are maintained, stored, and transported as assembled missiles without launch canisters, are assembled, including the joining of two or more stages.
(iiij First stages of ICBMs or SLBMs that are maintained, stored, and transported in stages are assembled.
(b) For ballistic missile submarines, a facility at which construction of ballistic missile submarines is performed.
(c) For mobile launchers of ICBMs, a facility at which the erector-launcher mechanism of a mobile launcher of ICBMs is mounted on the self-propelled device.
(d) For heavy bombers, a facility at which assembly of a complete heavy bomber airframe is performed.
58. (53.) The term “prototype” means, for ICBMs or SLBMs, an ICBM or SLBM of a new type, no more than 20 missiles of which have been launched, and no launchers of missiles of which have been deployed.
59. (13.) The term “range” means:
(a) For an ALCM, the maximum distance that can be flown by an ALCM of that type in its standard design mode flying until fuel exhaustion, determined by projecting its flight path onto the Earth’s sphere from the launch point to the point of impact.
(b) For a ballistic missile, the maximum distance determined by projecting the flight trajectory onto the Earth’s sphere from the launch point of a missile of that type to the point of impact of a reentry vehicle.
(c) For an aircraft, the maximum distance that can be flown, without refueling, by an aircraft of that type when carrying an ordnance load of 7500 kilograms, with a full fuel load in the internal and external fuel tanks and a flight profile optimized to ensure minimum fuel consumption per kilometer, taking into account the distance covered during climb and descent. The fuel remaining in the fuel tanks after landing shall be no more than five percent of the maximum capacity of the fuel tanks.
60. (7.) The term “reentry vehicle” means that part of the front section that can survive reentry through the dense layers of the Earth’s atmosphere and that is designed for delivering a weapon to a target or for testing such a delivery.
61. (33.) The term “repair facility” means:
(a) For ICBMs or SLBMs, a specified facility, outside an ICBM base or a submarine base, for the repair or maintenance of ICBMs or SLBMs.
(b) For mobile launchers of ICBMs, a specified facility, outside an ICBM base, for the repair or maintenance of mobile launchers of ICBMs.
(c) For heavy bombers, a specified facility, outside an air base, for the repair or maintenance of heavy bombers.
62. (19.) The term “rocket motor case” means the case that remains after the solid propellant is removed from the solid rocket motor.
63. (2.) The term “self-contained dispensing mechanism” means a device that separates from the final stage of a missile together with the front section and that independently targets and releases the reentry vehicle or reentry vehicles and penetration aids.
64. (49.) The term “sequential inspection” means an inspection, conducted at facilities associated with the same point of entry, by an inspection team that has not departed
the territory of the inspected Party following the completion of the previous inspection.
65. (87.) The term “silo launcher of ICBMs” means an ICBM launcher in a silo structure located in the ground.
66. (88.) The term “silo training launcher” means a full- scale silo launcher of ICBMs specified for training purposes.
67. (55.) The term ‘SLBM launcher” means a device intended or used to contain, prepare for launch, and launch an SLBM.
68. (26.) The term “SLBM loading facility” means a shore- based facility, outside a submarine base, where SLBMs are loaded onto or unloaded from ballistic missile submarines.
69. (57.) The term “soft-site launcher” means any land-based fixed launcher of ICBMs or SLBMs other than a silo launcher.
70. (77.) The term “solid-fueled ICBM” means an ICBM for which all stages are equipped with solid rocket motors.
71. (76.) The term “solid-fueled SLBM” means an SLBM for which all stages are equipped with solid rocket motors.
72. (78.) The term “solid rocket motor” means that part of the stage that consists of the case filled with solid propellant.
73. (28.) The term “space launch facility” means a specified facility from which objects are delivered into the upper atmosphere or space using ICBMs or SLBMs.
74. (75.) The term “stage” means, for ICBMs or SLBMs, a section of a missile that is equipped with a propulsion unit, with the exception of the self-contained dispensing mechanism.
75. (34.) The term “storage facility” means:
(a) For ICBMs or SLBMs, a specified facility, outside an ICBM base, a submarine base, a test range, or a space launch facility, for the storage of ICBMs or SLBMs.
(b) For mobile launchers of ICBMs, a specified facility, outside an ICBM base, a test range, or a space launch facility, for the storage of mobile launchers of ICBMs.
(c) For heavy bombers, a specified facility, outside an air base, for the storage of heavy bombers.
76. (4.) The term “submarine base” means a facility at which ballistic missile submarines, as well as submarines that had been previously equipped with SLBM launchers but after conversion are incapable of launching SLBMs, are based, and at which shore-based support for such submarines, which may include the assembly, loading, maintenance, and storage of SLBMs, is provided.
77. (6.) The term “submarine-launched ballistic missile” or “SLBM” means a ballistic missile with a range in excess of 600 kilometers of a type, any one of which has been contained in, or launched from, a submarine.
78. (79.) The term “telemetric information” means information that originates on board a missile during its initial motion and subsequent flight that is broadcast.
79. (83.) The term “test heavy bomber” means a heavy bomber equipped for nuclear armaments designated exclusively for testing and based at a heavy bomber flight test center.
80. (58.) The term “test launcher1′ means an ICBM launcher or an SLBM launcher located within a test range.
81. (18.) The term “test range1′ means a designated land area, other than an ICBM base, from which launches of ICBMs or SLBMs are conducted.
82. (31.) The term “training facility” means a specified facility, outside an ICBM base or a submarine base, at which personnel are trained to use, operate, or maintain ICBMs or SLBMs and their launchers.
83. (59.) The term “training launcher” means a silo training launcher or a mobile training launcher.
84. (84.) The term “training model of a missile” means a full-scale, inert model of an ICBM or SLBM that is not capable of being launched and that differs from an ICBM or SLBM on the basis of external and functional differences that are visible
during inspection activities.
85. (50.) The term “transit” means the one-way movement from one facility to another facility of:
(a) A non-deployed ICBM;
(b) A non-deployed SLBM; or
(c) A non-deployed mobile launcher of ICBMs.
86. (72.) The term “unique identifier” or “UID” means a non- repeating alpha-numeric number that has been applied by the inspected Party to an ICBM, SLBM, or heavy bomber.
87. (10.) The term “variant” means:
(a) For heavy bombers, a classification, declared by the inspected Party, of airplanes of one type and one category that are distinguishable from other airplanes of the same type and the same category.
(b) For ICBMs and SLBMs, a classification, declared by the inspected Party, of ICBMs of one type or SLBMs of one type that are distinguishable from other ICBMs or SLBMs of the same type.
88. (68.) The term “version” means, for mobile launchers of ICBMs of a type, a classification, declared by the inspected Party, based on external or functional differences from other such items.
89. (8.) The term “warhead” means a unit of account used for counting toward the 1550 aggregate limit as applied to deployed ICBMs, deployed SLBMs, and deployed heavy bombers.
90. (73.) The term “weapon-delivery vehicle” means, for ballistic missiles and cruise missiles, a missile of a type, any one of which has been launched or flight-tested, or deployed to carry or be used as a weapon, that is, as any mechanism or any device that, when directed against any target, is designed to damage or destroy it.

PART TWO -CATEGORIES OF DATA PERTAINING TO STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE ARMS

Section I. General Provisions

1. The Parties shall use the categories of data contained in this Part when providing data in accordance with the Treaty and this Protocol.
2. No later than 45 days after signature of the Treaty, each Party shall provide, in accordance with the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol, site diagrams of facilities and, if applicable, coastlines and waters diagrams for each facility at which inspection activities may be conducted.
3. No later than 45 days after entry into force of the Treaty, the Parties shall carry out an initial exchange of data according to the categories of data contained in this Part, and shall provide, in accordance with the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol, photographs, unless such photographs were previously provided in connection with fulfilling the requirements of the START Treaty.
4. For the purposes of this Part and exchanges of data, the mark “—” denotes that the entry is not applicable in such case. The mark “* * *” denotes that this data will be provided when available.
5. Each ICBM, each SLBM, and each heavy bomber shall have a unique identifier.
6. For the purposes of this Part, geographic coordinates shall be expressed in latitude and longitude to the nearest minute, except in cases where two or more locations for which
geographic coordinates are specified that are within one minute of latitude and longitude of each other and that are of the same type or have the same appearance. In such cases, the latitude and longitude shall be expressed to include seconds.
7. In specifying geographic coordinates, each Party shall use the system of coordinates commonly employed by it.
8. Geographic coordinates for silo launchers of ICBMs located in a silo launcher group at an ICBM base and test launchers shall be expressed to the nearest minute.
Section 11. Aggregate Numbers

For each Party, the data on aggregate numbers of strategic offensive arms limited by the Treaty are as follows:

United States of America Russian Federation

Deployed ICBMs, Deployed SLBMs, and Deployed Heavy Bombers *t*

***Warheads on Deployed ICBMs, on Deployed SLBMs, and Nuclear Warheads Counted for Deployed Heavy Bombers *** Deployed and Non-deployed Launchers of ICBMs, Deployed and Non-deployed Launchers of SLBMs, and Deployed and Non-deployed Heavy Bombers ***

Section 111. ICBMs, ICBM Launchers, and Warheads on Deployed ICBMs

For each Party, the numbers of deployed ICBMs, non-deployed ICBMs, deployed launchers of ICBMs, non-deployed launchers of ICBMs, warheads on deployed ICBMs, as well as data on facilities associated with ICBMs, are as follows:

Section IV. SLBMs, SLBM Launchers, and Warheads on Deployed SLBMs

For each Party, the numbers of deployed SLBMS, non-deployed SLBMs, deployed launchers of SLBMs, non-deployed launchers of SLBMs, warheads on deployed SLBMs, as well as data on facilities associated with SLBMs, are as follows:

Section V. Heavy Bombers and Nuclear Warheads Counted for Deployed Heavy Bombers

For each Party, the numbers of deployed heavy bombers, non-deployed heavy bombers, nuclear warheads counted for deployed heavy bombers, as well as data on facilities associated with heavy bombers, are as follows:

For each Party, the numbers of non-deployed ICBMs and non-deployed SLBMs, and non-deployed launchers of ICBMs and non-deployed launchers of SLBMs, at space launch facilities, and the data on space launch facilities, are as follows:

Section VIII. Heavy Bomber Distinguishing Features

1. United States of America
(a) Heavy Bombers Equipped for Nuclear Armaments
(i) For Heavy Bombers
(A) Externally Observable Distinguishing Features:
(B) Distinguishing Features Under Wing/Fuselage:
(C) Distinguishing Features of Weapons Bay:
(D) Technical Data for Recognition of Heavy Bombers:
(b) Heavy Bombers Equipped for Non-nuclear ~rmaments’ Differences that make heavy bombers equipped for non-nuclear armaments distinguishable from heavy bombers of this type equipped for nuclear armaments:
(i) For Heavy Bombers
(A) Externally Observable Distinguishing Features:
Distinguishing features of B-1B heavy bombers equipped for non-nuclear armaments shall be recorded in accordance with subparagraph l(b) of this Section, based on the results of the exhibition conducted in accordance with the First Agreed Statement contained in Part Nine of this Protocol.
(B) Distinguishing Features Under Wing/Fuselage:
(C) Distinguishing Features of Weapons Bay:
2. Russian Federation
(a) Heavy Bombers Equipped for Nuclear Armaments
(i) For Heavy Bombers
(A) Externally Observable Distinguishing Features:
(B) Distinguishing Features Under Wing/Fuselage:
(C) Distinguishing Features of Weapons Bay:
(D) Technical Data for Recognition of Heavy Bombers:
(b) Heavy Bombers Equipped for Non-nuclear Armaments Differences that make heavy bombers equipped for non-nuclear armaments distinguishable from heavy bombers of this type equipped for nuclear armaments:
(i) For Heavy Bombers
(A) Externally Observable Distinguishing Features:
(B) Distinguishing Features Under Wing/ Fuselage:
(C) Distinguishing Features of Weapons Bay:

Section IX. Other Data Required by the Treaty

1. Notwithstanding subparagraph 3(b) of Article IV of the Treaty, the first stage of an ICBM or SLBM may be located at the locations provided for in this paragraph where static testing or static firing is conducted. Such first stages of ICBMs or SLBMs shall continue to be declared for the facility at which such first stages of ICBMs and SLBMs were located prior to their movement to the locations provided for in this paragraph.
(a) Russian Federation
(b) United States of America
2. To each Party, ICBMs, SLBMs, submarines, heavy bombers, inspection airplanes, and, where applicable, variants referred to in the Treaty, are known as follows:

3. For each Party, the inspection activity sites associated with points of entry are as follows:
4. For each Party, the facilities not subject to inspection are as follows:
5. For each Party, the airports for the points of entry are as follows:
(a) United States of America Point of Entry Airports
(b) Russian Federation Point of Entry Airports
6. For each Party, the routes for flights of inspection airplanes to points of entry are as follows:
(a) For flights of inspection airplanes of the Russian Federation to the United States of America: Route to Point Route from Point of Entry of Entry From to:
(b) For flights of inspection airplanes of the United States of America to the Russian Federation:
Route to Point Route from Point of Entry of Entry From to:
7. For each Party, formerly declared facilities that, in accordance with Section VII of Part Three of this Protocol, are considered eliminated for the purposes of the Treaty and notification of elimination of which has been provided in accordance with Section I1 of Part Four of this Protocol, are as follows:
8. For each Party, currently or formerly declared facilities, portions of which have been excluded, in accordance with the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol, for the purposes of the Treaty from within the boundaries specified on the inspection site diagrams of such facilities, and notification of changes in the boundaries of which has been provided in accordance with Section VI of Part Four of this Protocol, are as follows:
(a) Russian Federation Function of the Facility that Incorporated Excluded Portions:

PART THREE -CONVERSION OR ELIMINATION PROCEDURES

Section I. General Provisions

1. Conversion or elimination of strategic offensive arms subject to the Treaty shall be carried out in situ or at declared facilities.
2. Elimination of strategic offensive arms subject to the Treaty shall be carried out by rendering them inoperable, precluding their use for their original purpose. Upon completion of elimination, an eliminated strategic offensive arm shall cease to be subject to the Treaty.
3. If an ICBM launcher or SLBM launcher is converted to a launcher of ICBMs or a launcher of SLBMs of another type, it shall be considered to be a launcher of ICBMs or a launcher of SLBMs of the type to which it was converted. If an ICBM launcher, SLBM launcher, or heavy bomber is converted by rendering it incapable of employing ICBMs, SLBMs, or nuclear armaments, so that the other Party can confirm the results of the conversion, such a converted strategic offensive arm shall cease to be subject to the aggregate numbers provided for in Article I1 of the Treaty and may be used for purposes not inconsistent with the Treaty.
4. If one of the Parties decides to carry out a conversion or elimination of a type of strategic offensive arm subject to the Treaty using procedures that it developed in accordance with this Part, it shall notify the other Party of such procedures in accordance with Part Four of this Protocol. If, in the opinion of the other Party, the procedures developed by the Party carrying out the conversion or elimination are ambiguous or do not achieve the goals set forth in paragraph 2 or 3 of this Section, the Party carrying out the conversion or elimination shall conduct a demonstration, within the framework of the BCC, of the procedures that it developed. After the demonstration, such procedures shall be recorded within the framework of the BCC and may be used thereafter for conversion or elimination of that type of strategic offensive arm.
5. Upon completion of conversion of the first item of a type of strategic offensive arm subject to the Treaty, the Party carrying out the conversion shall conduct an exhibition in accordance with Article XI of the Treaty.
6. The results of conversion or elimination of strategic offensive arms and facilities subject to the Treaty may be confirmed in accordance with Articles X and XI of the Treaty.

Section 11. Procedures for Elimination of ICBMs and SLBMs

1. Procedures for elimination of liquid-fueled ICBMs or liquid-fueled SLBMs shall be determined by the Party carrying out the elimination. Upon completion of the elimination procedures, notification thereof shall be provided.
2. The elimination of solid-fueled ICBMs and solid-fueled SLBMs shall be carried out using any of the procedures provided for in this paragraph:
(a) If the first stage is destroyed by explosion, notification thereof shall be provided.
(b) If the fuel is removed by burning, the first stage rocket motor case shall have a hole, no less than one meter in diameter, cut or punched through the case along the lateral
surface, or the first stage rocket motor case shall be cut into two parts of approximately equal size.
(c) If the fuel is removed by washing, the first stage rocket motor case shall be crushed, flattened, or cut into two parts of approximately equal size.
3. Upon completion of the elimination procedure in accordance with subparagraph 2(b) or 2(c) of this Section and provision of notification thereof, the eliminated solid-fueled ICBMs and solid-fueled SLBMs shall remain visible to national technical means of verification for a 60-day period. The Party receiving such notification shall have the right, within a 30-day period beginning on the date of provision of notification, to conduct an inspection of the eliminated solid-fueled ICBMs and solid-fueled SLBMs. If a Party accumulates eliminated solid-fueled ICBMs and solid-fueled SLBMs, the specified eliminated solid-fueled ICBMs and solid-fueled SLBMs shall cease to be subject to the Treaty upon completion of the inspection or, if the inspection was not conducted, upon expiration of the 30-day period. Eliminated solid-fueled ICBMs and solid-fueled SLBMs that have not been accumulated shall cease to be subject to the Treaty upon completion of the inspection or, if an inspection was not conducted, upon expiration of the 60-day period.
4. The elimination of launch canisters for ICBMs and SLBMs shall be carried out by separating the launch canister into two parts. Upon completion of the elimination procedure and provision of notification thereof, the parts of the launch canister for ICBMs and SLBMs shall remain visible to national technical means of verification at the declared facility for a 60-day period. Upon expiration of the 60-day period, the launch canister shall be considered to be eliminated.
5. Upon completion of the elimination process for launch canisters for ICBMs and SLBMs, the launch canisters may be used for purposes not inconsistent with the Treaty but shall not be transferred to a third party.

Section 111. Procedures for Conversion or Elimination of ICBM Launchers

1. A silo launcher of ICBMs shall remain visible to national technical means of verification during the entire elimination process and for a 60-day period following provision of notification of the completion of the elimination process.
2. The elimination of silo launchers of ICBMs shall be carried out using any of the procedures provided for in this paragraph:
(a) The silo door shall be removed, dismantled, or destroyed, and the silo headworks and the silo shall be destroyed by excavating them to a depth of no less than eight meters or by explosion to a depth of no less than six meters;
(b) The silo door shall be removed, dismantled, or destroyed and the silo shall be completely filled with debris resulting from demolition of infrastructure, and with earth or gravel. The silo door shall not be reinstalled; or
(c) Other procedures that are developed by the Party carrying out the elimination.
3. Upon completion of the elimination procedures in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Section and provision of notification thereof, the area where the eliminated silo launcher of ICBMs was located may be graded after expiration of the 60-day period. The Party receiving such notification shall have the right, within a 30-day period beginning on the date of provision of notification, to conduct an inspection of the eliminated silo launcher of ICBMs. Upon expiration of the 60-day period following provision of such notification or upon completion of the inspection, the silo launcher of ICBMs shall cease to be subject to the Treaty.
4. The elimination of mobile launchers of ICBMs shall be carried out by cutting the erector-launcher mechanism, leveling supports, and mountings of the erector-launcher mechanism from the launcher chassis and by removing the missile launch support equipment, including external instrumentation compartments, from the launcher chassis.
5. If the chassis of the eliminated mobile launcher of ICBMs is used at a declared facility for purposes not inconsistent with the Treaty, the upper surfaces of the vehicle and of the items mounted on the chassis, visible to national technical means of verification, shall be painted so that they are distinguishable from the upper surfaces of a deployed mobile
launcher of ICBMs.
6. Upon completion of the elimination procedure in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Section and provision of notification thereof, the eliminated mobile launcher of ICBMs shall remain visible to national technical means of verification for a 60- day period. The Party receiving such notification shall have the right, within a 30-day period beginning on the date of provision of notification, to conduct an inspection of the eliminated mobile launcher of ICBMs. If a Party accumulates eliminated mobile launchers of ICBMs, the specified launchers shall cease to be subject to the Treaty, with the exception of the provisions of paragraph 5 of this Section, upon completion of the inspection or, if an inspection was not conducted, upon expiration of the 30-day period. Eliminated mobile launchers of ICBMs that have not been accumulated shall cease to be subject to the Treaty, with the exception of the provisions of paragraph 5 of this Section, upon completion of the inspection or, if an inspection was not conducted, upon expiration of the 60-day period.
7. Upon completion of the elimination process for the mobile launcher of ICBMs, the vehicle may be used for purposes not inconsistent with the Treaty.
8. Conversion of an ICBM launcher to a launcher of ICBMs of another type shall be carried out using procedures developed by the Party carrying out the conversion. Upon completion of the conversion procedures and provision of notification thereof, the converted launcher of ICBMs shall be considered to be a launcher of ICBMs of the other type.

Section IV. Procedures for Conversion or Elimination of SLBM Launchers

1. The elimination of SLBM launchers shall be carried out by removing all missile launch tube hatches, their associated superstructure fairings, and, if applicable, gas generators.
2. Upon completion of the procedures provided for in paragraph 1 of this Section and provision of notification thereof, the SLBM launchers shall cease to be subject to the Treaty.
3. A submarine on which SLBM launchers have been eliminated in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Section shall remain visible to national technical means of verification for a 60- day period following provision of notification.
4. Upon expiration of the 60-day period provided for in paragraph 3 of this Section, scrapping of the submarine shall be carried out at the facility at which it is located, or the submarine may be moved for this purpose to another declared facility, notification of which shall be provided. After provision of notification of the completion of scrapping, the submarine shall cease to be subject to the Treaty.
5. Conversion of an SLBM launcher to a launcher of SLBMs of another type shall be carried out using procedures developed by the Party carrying out the conversion. Upon completion of the conversion procedures and provision of notification thereof, the converted launcher of SLBMs shall be considered to be a launcher of SLBMs of the other type.
6. Conversion of an SLBM launcher that precludes its use as an SLBM launcher shall be carried out using any of the procedures provided for in this paragraph:
(a) The height or diameter of the launcher shall be reduced so that the launcher can no longer contain the smallest SLBM deployed by the Party carrying out the conversion;
(b) Critical components required to launch an SLBM shall be removed. Such critical components may include, among other things, gas generators and launch-related subsystems; or
(c) Other procedures that are developed by the Party carrying out the conversion.
7. Upon completion of the conversion procedures in accordance with paragraph 6 of this Section and provision of notification thereof, the submarine shall be made available for viewing upon return to the submarine base. The Party receiving such notification shall have the right, within a 30-day period beginning on the date of provision of notification, to conduct an inspection of the converted launcher of SLBMs in order to confirm that the procedures provided for in paragraph 6 of this Section have been completed. The submarine shall remain at the submarine base until an inspection is completed, or, if an inspection was not conducted, until expiration of the 30- day period. Upon completion of the inspection, or, if an inspection was not conducted, upon expiration of the 30-day period, the SLBM launcher shall be considered to be converted.

Section V. Procedures for Conversion or Elimination of Heavy Bombers

1. The elimination of a heavy bomber shall be carried out by cutting a wing or tail section from the fuselage at locations obviously not assembly joints, or by cutting the fuselage into two parts at a location obviously not an assembly joint.
2. A heavy bomber shall remain visible to national technical means of verification during the entire elimination process and for a 60-day period following provision of notification of the completion of the elimination. Upon expiration of the 60- day period, the heavy bomber shall cease to be subject to the Treaty.
3. The conversion process for a heavy bomber equipped for nuclear armaments to a heavy bomber equipped for non-nuclear armaments shall be carried out using any of the procedures provided for in this paragraph:
(a) All weapons bays and all external attachments for pylons shall be modified so as to render them incapable of employing nuclear armaments;
(b) All internal and external launcher assemblies shall be modified so as to render them incapable of employing nuclear armaments; or
(c) Other procedures that are developed by the Party carrying out the conversion.
4. Upon completion of the conversion procedures in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Section and provision of notification thereof, the converted heavy bomber shall not be flown but shall be moved directly to the viewing site at the facility at which the conversion was carried out. The Party receiving such notification shall have the right, within a 30-day period beginning on the date of provision of notification, to conduct an inspection of the converted heavy bomber in order to confirm that the procedures provided for in paragraph 3 of this Section have been completed. The converted heavy bomber shall remain at the viewing site at the facility at which the conversion was carried out until an inspection is completed, or, if an inspection was not conducted, until expiration of the 30-day period. Upon completion of the inspection, or, if an inspection was not conducted, upon expiration of the 30-day period, the heavy bomber shall be considered to be converted.

Section VI. Other Means for Removal from Accountability

1. A strategic offensive arm shall cease to be subject to the Treaty if:
(a) A strategic offensive arm is lost as a result of an accident or is disabled beyond repair;
(b) A strategic offensive arm is placed on static display;
(c) A heavy bomber is converted for use as a ground trainer; or
(d) An ICBM or SLBM is eliminated by launch, static testing, or static firing.
2. Prior to the placement of a strategic offensive arm on static display or prior to the use of a heavy bomber as a ground trainer, such a strategic offensive arm shall be rendered inoperable.
3. An ICBM or SLBM shall cease to be subject to the Treaty on the date of the launch, static testing, or static firing as specified in the notification.

Section VII. Procedures for Elimination of Facilities

1. The elimination of declared facilities shall be subject to verification by national technical means of verification and shall be carried out by removal or elimination of all strategic offensive arms specified for such a facility, as well as training models of missiles, training launchers, fixed structures for mobile launchers of ICBMs, launch-associated vehicles, and driver training vehicles.
2. The elimination process for fixed structures for mobile launchers of ICBMs shall be carried out by dismantling and removing the superstructure of the fixed structure from the facility. No structure or covering, permanent or temporary, shall be reinstalled or built over the remaining foundation.
3. The declared facility shall be considered to be eliminated following completion of the procedures provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Section and provision of notification thereof.

PART FOUR -NOTIFICATIONS

Section I. General Provisions

1. The Parties shall provide notifications provided for in Article VII of the Treaty in accordance with the provisions of this Part and of the Annex on Notifications to this Protocol.
2. The time and date in a notification shall be expressed in Greenwich Mean Time. The date of provision of notification shall be the date of receipt of the notification. The notification shall become effective either on the date it was received or on the date of the occurrence of the event specified in the notification.

Section 11. Notifications Concerning Data Pertaining to Strategic Offensive Arms

1. Notification, to be provided no later than 45 days after entry into force of the Treaty, providing data current as of the date of entry into force of the Treaty for each category of data contained in Part Two of this Protocol.
2. Notification, to be provided no later than 30 days after the expiration of each six-month period following the entry into force of the Treaty, providing updated data for each category of data contained in Part Two of this Protocol. The first of these six-month periods shall begin the first day of the calendar month following the month in which the Treaty enters into force.
3. Notification, to be provided no later than five days after it occurs, of each change in data for each category of data contained in Part Two of this Protocol, unless the notification of such change in data has been provided in accordance with other provisions of this Part. Notification of each change in data on warheads shall be provided only in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Section. The changes in data of which notifications are provided shall include, among other things:
(a) The loss of an item as the result of an accident, disablement of an item beyond repair, placement of an item on static display, conversion of a heavy bomber for use as a ground trainer, launch of an ICBM or SLBM, static testing, or static firing.
(b) The emergence of new facilities, new types, variants of ICBMs and SLBMs, and new versions of mobile launchers of ICBMs.
(c) Elimination of an ICBM, ICBM launcher, SLBM, SLBM launcher, heavy bomber, or declared facility.
(d) A change of category of an existing facility.
(e) A change of category of an item from deployed to non-deployed or from non-deployed to deployed.
4. Notification, to be provided no later than five days after the arrival at a declared facility, of the first prototype ICBM or prototype SLBM of a new type.
5. Notification, to be provided no later than 30 days after the twentieth launch of a prototype ICBM or prototype SLBM of a type or no less than 30 days in advance of the deployment of the first ICBM or SLBM of the same type, that the prototype ICBM or prototype SLBM shall be considered to be an ICBM or SLBM of a new type.
6. Notification, to be provided no later than five days after the decision has been made, of the cessation of development of a prototype ICBM or prototype SLBM of a new type.
7. Notification, to be provided no later than five days after it has been completed, of the transfer of SLBMs to or from a third State in accordance with an existing pattern of cooperation.
8. Notification concerning a new kind of strategic offensive arm.

Section 111. Notifications Concerning Movement of Strategic Offensive Arms

1. Notification, to be provided no less than 48 hours in advance of the exit of solid-fueled ICBMs and solid-fueled SLBMs from production facilities, specified in accordance with Part Two of this Protocol.
2. Notification, to be provided no later than five days after the completion of the movement of ICBMs to or from a test range located outside a Party’s national territory, which a Party has used for conducting launches of ICBMs between December 5, 1994 and December 4, 2009.
3. Notification, to be provided no later than 24 hours after the visit of a heavy bomber of one of the Parties that is of a type subject to the Treaty has exceeded 24 hours in duration,
of the visit of such a heavy bomber to a specific location inside its national territory or to a geographic region outside its national territory.
4. Notification, to be provided no later than 48 hours after departure, of the conclusion of the visit of a heavy bomber of a type subject to the Treaty, notification of which has been provided in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Section.
5. Notification, to be provided no less than 14 days in advance of the beginning of a major strategic exercise involving heavy bombers, of the beginning of such an exercise. Such notification shall be provided in accordance with the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on Reciprocal Advance Notification of Major Strategic Exercises of September 23, 1989.
6. Notification, to be provided no later than 48 hours after the completion of a major strategic exercise involving heavy bombers, of the completion of such an exercise.

Section IV. Notifications Concerning Launches of ICBMs or SLBMs, and the Exchange of Telemetric Information

1. Notification, to be provided no less than 24 hours in advance of any launch of an ICBM or SLBM. Such notification shall be provided in accordance with the Agreement Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on Notifications of Launches of Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles and Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missiles of May 31, 1988.
2. Notification, to be provided no later than 180 days after the receipt of the recording media and interpretive data, concerning the incomplete or insufficient quality of the recording media provided, the telemetric information recorded on it, or the interpretive data.
3. Notification, to be provided no later than 60 days after receipt of the notification provided for in paragraph 2 of this Section, containing an explanation concerning theincomplete or insufficient quality of the recording media provided, the telemetricinformation recorded on it, or the interpretive data.
4. Notification, to be provided no less than 30 days in advance of the demonstration, of the proposed date and place for the demonstration of the recording media and/or appropriate playback equipment.
5. Notification containing a request to acquire playback equipment for telemetric information, or its spare parts, or the response to such a request. The response to such a request shall be provided no later than 30 days after receipt of the request.
6. Notification containing a request for maintenance or for training in the operation and maintenance of the telemetry playback equipment, or the response to such a request. The response to such a request shall be provided no later than 45 days after the receipt of the request.

Section V. Notifications Concerning Conversion or Elimination

1. For conversion or elimination of ICBMs and SLBMs, launch canisters for ICBMs and SLBMs, ICBM launchers and SLBM launchers, heavy bombers, and facilities:
(a) Notification, to be provided no less than 30 days in advance of the initiation of conversion or elimination, of the intent to carry out a conversion or elimination.
(b) Notification, to be provided no later than five days after the initiation of a conversion or elimination, of the initiation of a conversion or elimination.
(c) Notification, to be provided no later than five days after the completion of conversion or elimination procedures, of the completion of conversion or elimination procedures.
2. Notification, to be provided no later than 20 days after the beginning of each calendar year, of the number and types of strategic offensive arms scheduled for conversion or elimination during the year.

Section VI. Notifications Concerning Inspection Activities

1. Notification, to be provided no later than 30 days after entry into force of the Treaty, for the period until the end of the current calendar year and thereafter no less than 30 days prior to the beginning of each following calendar year, for the period until the end of that calendar year, of the standing diplomatic clearance number for inspection airplanes.
2. Notification, to be provided by the inspecting Party no less than six hours in advance of the planned time of departure of an inspection airplane from the last airfield prior to its entry into the airspace of the inspected Party, containing the flight plan for such an airplane.
3. Notification, to be provided by the inspected Party no less than three hours in advance of the planned time of departure of an inspection airplane from the last airfield prior to its entry into the airspace of the inspected Party, of a flight plan approval for such an airplane.
4. Notification, to be provided by a Party no less than 30 days prior to the implementation of a change, of the change to flight routes for inspection airplanes to or from a point of entry established on the territory of that Party.
5. Notification, to be provided no later than 25 days after entry into force of the Treaty, containing the initial lists of inspectors and aircrew members.
6. Notification, to be provided no more than once in each 45- day period, of amendments to the lists of inspectors and aircrew members.
7. Notification, to be provided no later than 30 days after receipt of the notifications provided for in paragraphs 5 and 6 of this Section, of agreement with or objection to each inspector or aircrew member proposed for inclusion on the lists, as well as, in the case of objection to an inspector or aircrew member already on the lists, of such objection.
8. Notification, to be provided simultaneously with the notification provided for in paragraph 2 of Section I1 of this Part, containing the agreed lists of inspectors and aircrew members.
9. Notification, to be provided only during normal working days no less than 32 hours in advance of the estimated time of arrival of the inspection team at the point of entry, of an intention to conduct an inspection.
10. Notification, to be provided by the inspected Party no later than 30 days after entry into force of the Treaty, of the determination of agreed geographic coordinates of reference points used at the point of entry. Thereafter, the inspected Party shall provide supplementary notifications on each change to these reference points.
11. Notification of changes to the site diagrams of facilities and coastlines and waters diagrams.
12. Notification, to be provided no less than 30 days in advance of the planned date of an exhibition, of the intent to conduct an exhibition.
13. Notification, to be provided no less than 72 hours in advance of the planned date of an exhibition, of the intent to take part in an exhibition.
14. Notifications, to be provided by the inspection team leader, in writing, to a member of the in-country escort during inspections:
(a) Notification of the designation of the type of inspection and of the inspection site, to be provided at the point of entry no later than four hours after arrival of the inspection team at the point of entry or its return to the point of entry after the previous inspection. In the event that the inspection team intends to conduct a sequential inspection without returning to the point of entry, such notification shall be provided prior to the completion of the post-inspection procedures of the previous inspection.
(b) Notification, to be provided simultaneously with the notification of the designation of the type of inspection and of the inspection site, of the intent to conduct a sequential inspection.
(c) Notification, to be provided at the point of entry or at the inspection site in the event of the cancellation of an inspection, of such cancellation.
(d) Notification, to be provided at the inspection site after completion of pre-inspection procedures, of the designation of an item intended for inspection.

Section VII. Notifications Concerning Activities of the BCC and Additional Messages

1. Notification, to be provided in accordance with Part Six of this Protocol, containing a request to convene a session of the BCC.
2. Notification, to be provided in accordance with Part Six of this Protocol, containing a response to a request to convene a session of the BCC.
3. Notifications containing other messages relating to the activities of the BCC.
4. Notification containing a request for clarification of a notification.
5. Notification containing clarification, correction, or modification of a notification.
6. Notification of an additional message with respect to the Treaty.

PART FIVE -INSPECTION ACTIVITIES

Section I. General Provisions

1. For the purposes of helping to ensure verification of compliance with the provisions of the Treaty, each Party shall facilitate the conduct of inspection activities by the other Party in accordance with the provisions of this Part.
2. Each Party shall have the right to begin inspection activities 60 days after entry into force of the Treaty and to conduct them thereafter.
3. Each Party shall provide to the other Party notifications relating to inspection activities in accordance with Part Four of this Protocol.
4. Each Party shall have the right to conduct no more than one inspection on the territory of the inspected Party at any one time.
5. In exceptional cases, and for purposes not inconsistent with the Treaty, the inspected Party may temporarily exempt from inspection activities appropriate facilities subject to Type One or Type Two inspections and appropriate facilities at which exhibitions are to be conducted. Notification thereof shall be provided through diplomatic channels along with an explanation of the reason for such exemption from inspection activities.

Section 11. Legal Status of Inspectors and Aircrew Members

1. Inspection activities shall be conducted by inspectors. Inspectors shall be transported to and from the territory of the inspected Party by inspection airplanes, commercial flights, and Open Skies airplanes.
2. The list of inspectors shall not contain at any one time more than 300 individuals. The number of individuals on the list of aircrew members shall be determined at the discretion of each Party, based on the premise that the number of aircrew members for each inspection airplane shall not exceed ten. Inspectors and aircrew members shall be citizens of the inspecting Party.
3. Each Party shall have the right to amend the lists of its inspectors and aircrew members no more than once in each 45- day period. With each amendment, the number of inspectors whose names are entered in the list of inspectors shall not exceed 30, and the number of aircrew members whose names are entered in the list of aircrew members shall not exceed 25. The Party receiving notification of an amendment to lists of inspectors or aircrew members shall provide notification in accordance with Part Four of this Protocol to the other Party of its agreement with, or objection to, the designation of each such inspector or aircrew member.
4. For each proposed inspector and aircrew member, the lists shall contain first name, middle name or patronymic, and last name; day, month, and year of birth; place of birth (city, state or oblast, and country); and passport number, if available.
5. The initial exchange of lists of inspectors and aircrew members shall take place no later than 25 days after entry into force of the Treaty. No later than 30 days after the initial exchange of lists or after receipt of a notification of amendments to the lists of inspectors and aircrew members, the Party receiving such lists or proposed amendments thereto shall provide visas and, where necessary, such other documents to each individual to whom it has agreed, as may be required to ensure that each inspector or aircrew member may enter, remain in, and leave the territory of that Party throughout the in-country period. The inspected Party shall ensure that such visas and appropriate documents shall be valid for a period of no less than 24 months, and the inspecting Party shall ensure that individuals receiving such visas and appropriate documents use them only for the purpose of conducting inspection activities in accordance with this Part.
6. An individual included on the list of inspectors may be objected to only if that individual is under indictment for a criminal offense on the territory of the inspected Party, if that individual has been convicted in a criminal prosecution or expelled by the Party reviewing the list, or if that individual has been previously deleted from the list at the request of the inspected Party for having violated the conditions governing inspection activities as provided for in this Part. An individual included on the list of aircrew members may be objected to if that individual is found unacceptable by the Party reviewing the list. The Party making an objection to such individual shall so notify the other Party in accordance with Part Four of this Protocol. Individuals who are objected to shall be deleted from the lists.
7. In order to exercise their functions effectively, for the purposes of implementing the Treaty and not for their personal benefit, the inspectors and aircrew members shall be accorded the following privileges and immunities for the entire time the inspectors or aircrew members are within the territory of the other Party:
(a) Such personnel shall be accorded the inviolability enjoyed by diplomatic agents in accordance with Article 29 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of April 18, 1961, and the immunities accorded to diplomatic agents in accordance with paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 of Article 31 of that Convention.
(b) The papers and correspondence of such personnel shall enjoy the inviolability accorded to the papers and correspondence of diplomatic agents in accordance with Article 30 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of April 18, 1961.
(c) Inspection airplanes transporting inspection teams to and from the points of entry shall be inviolable.
(d) Inspectors and aircrew members shall have the right to bring into the territory of the inspected Party, without payment of any customs duties and related taxes and charges, articles for their personal use, provided, however, that they shall not be permitted to bring into the territory of the inspected Party any articles, the import or export of which is prohibited by law or controlled by quarantine regulations of the inspected Party.
(e) If the inspected Party considers that there has been an abuse of privileges and immunities provided for in this paragraph, consultations shall be held between the Parties to determine whether such an abuse has occurred. If it is determined that such an abuse has occurred, the inspecting Party shall take necessary measures to prevent a repetition of such an abuse.
(f) During their stay in the territory of the inspected Party, without prejudice to the privileges and immunities provided for in this paragraph, inspectors and aircrew members shall be obliged to respect the laws and regulations of the inspected Party, shall be obliged not to interfere in its internal affairs, and shall not engage in any professional or commercial activity for personal profit on the territory of the inspected Party.
8. Upon completion of their official functions on the territory of the inspected Party, with respect to acts performed by inspectors and aircrew members in the exercise of their official functions, the immunity of such personnel shall continue to subsist to the extent that immunity continues to subsist with respect to persons enjoying privileges and immunities in accordance with paragraph 2 of Article 39 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of April 18, 1961.

Section 111. Arrangements for Air Transportation

1. Each Party shall establish on its territory two points of entry. The points of entry, airports associated with them, and their associated inspection activity sites shall be provided in accordance with Part Two of this Protocol.
2. The inspecting Party shall have the right to use agreed types of inspection airplanes for the transportation of inspectors to the points of entry on the territory of the inspected Party. Such airplanes may, at the same time that they are transporting inspectors, carry equipment intended for inspection activities. The inspecting Party shall provide the relevant notification of each flight of an inspection airplane transporting inspectors.
3. The inspecting Party shall have the right to use airplanes making regularly scheduled commercial flights to transport inspectors to those points of entry that are served by such airplanes. The provisions of this Part shall not apply to airplanes making regularly scheduled commercial flights that are used for the transportation of inspectors to points of entry, and to their aircrews.
4. Each Party may use Open Skies airplanes making observation flights over the territory of the inspected Party for the transportation of inspectors to and/or from the points of entry so long as the inspecting Party complies with the provisions provided for in paragraph 19 of Section V of this Part.
5. The routes for flights of inspection airplanes to and from the points of entry shall be provided in accordance with Part Two of this Protocol. Flight plans shall be filed in accordance with Part Four of this Protocol.
6. The inspected Party shall provide parking, security protection, fueling, air navigation, airport facility, ground technical and commercial services, as well as additional services as requested, for inspection airplanes of the inspecting Party at the point of entry. The cost of parking, security protection, fueling, air navigation, airport facility, ground technical and commercial services as well as additional services as requested, for each such airplane, shall be borne by the inspecting Party.

Section IV. Activities Beginning Upon Arrival at the Point of Entry

1. The inspection team and aircrew members shall arrive at the point of entry on the territory of the inspected Party that is associated with the inspection activity site. Upon arrival at the point of entry, the in-country escort shall meet the inspection team and aircrew members and shall expedite their entry and the entry of their baggage and equipment intended for use during inspection activities, which shall be exempt from all customs duties and related taxes and charges. The in-country escort shall accompany the inspection team and assist it in exercising its functions during the entire period it is in the territory of the inspected Party. Storage of equipment and supplies at each point of entry shall be within a secure structure or room.
2. As soon as an airplane lands, diplomatic officials from the embassy or consulate of the inspecting Party shall also meet the inspection team and aircrew members. Diplomatic officials may accompany inspectors only during their stay at the point of entry, but may accompany the aircrew members during the entire period they are in the territory of the inspected Party.
3. An inspector shall be considered to have assumed the duties of an inspector upon arrival at the point of entry on the territory of the inspected Party and shall be considered to have ceased performing those duties after departure from the territory of the inspected Party through the point of entry.

4. Equipment that the inspecting Party brings into the country shall be subject to examination each time it is brought into the country. Such equipment shall be examined by the in-country escort, in the presence of inspectors. The purpose of such examination shall be to ascertain to the satisfaction of each Party that the equipment cannot perform functions unconnected with the requirements of inspection activities. The examination of the equipment shall be completed prior to the departure of the inspection team from the point of entry to the inspection activity site. The list of inspection equipment and the procedures for its examination and use are specified in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol.
5. At the point of entry, the inspection team leader shall, at or before the time for the designation of the inspection site specified in the notification provided in accordance with Part Four of this Protocol, designate, in writing, to the inspected Party through the in-country escort, the type of inspection and the inspection site.
6. For Type One inspections:
(a) A member of the in-country escort shall inform the inspection team leader no later than two hours after designation of the inspection site, prior to the departure of the inspection team to the inspection site, of the number of deployed ICRMs or deployed SLBMs located at the designated base at the time pre-inspection restrictions were implemented, or deployed heavy bombers that are based at the designated base and those temporarily located at such a base at the time pre-inspection restrictions were implemented.
(b) If at the designated base, less than 50 percent of the deployed ICBMs based at the ICBM base are present, less than 30 percent of deployed SLBMs contained in SLBM launchers installed on ballistic missile submarines based at the submarine base are present, or less than 70 percent of the deployed heavy bombers based at the air base are present, no later than one hour after the information contained in subparagraph (a) of this paragraph has been provided, the inspection team leader shall have the right to:
(i) Inform a member of the in-country escort that the inspection of the designated base shall take place; or
(ii) Designate another inspection site associated with the same point of entry; or
(iii) Decline to conduct the inspection and leave the territory of the inspected Party. In this event, the number of such inspections to which the inspecting Party is entitled shall not be reduced.
(c) For sequential inspections, the procedures provided for in subparagraphs (a) and (b) of this paragraph shall be carried out at the location at which the inspection team leader designates the subsequent inspection site.
7. The activities of inspection teams on the territory of the inspected Party may be covered by the mass media only at the point of entry. The inspected Party shall determine the appropriate procedures.

Section V. General Rules for the Conduct of Inspection Activities

1. Inspectors shall discharge their functions in accordance with this Part.
2. The inspected Party shall provide meals, lodging, work space, transportation, and, as necessary, medical and other urgent services for the inspectors and aircrew members of the inspecting Party throughout the in-country period. Costs of all such services shall be borne by the inspected Party.
3. The inspecting Party shall ensure that its inspectors not publicly disclose information obtained during inspection activities except with the express consent of the inspecting Party. Such consent shall be granted only with the express consent of the inspected Party. The inspecting Party shall ensure that its inspectors remain bound by this obligation even after termination of their activities as inspectors.
4. The boundaries of the inspection sites shall be the boundaries depicted on the inspection site diagrams that are exchanged by the Parties in accordance with Part Two of this Protocol.
5. In discharging their functions, inspectors shall communicate with personnel of the inspected Party only through the in-country escort. Except as provided for in this Protocol, inspectors shall not interfere with activities being conducted at the inspected facility and shall not hamper or delay the operation of a facility. Inspectors shall take no actions affecting the safe operation of a facility. Inspectors shall observe safety regulations established at the inspection activity site. The in-country escort shall provide safety briefings. The inspected Party shall provide, as necessary, individual protective gear.
6. At the inspection activity site, representatives of the inspected facility shall be included among the in-country escort. The inspected Party shall ensure that a member of the in-country escort at the facility is continuously available to inspectors either in person or by telephone. Throughout the in-country period, the inspected Party shall ensure that the inspectors can be in communication with the embassy of the inspecting Party located on the territory of the inspected Party using telephonic communications provided by the inspected Party. The inspected Party shall also provide means of communication between inspection team subgroups at the inspection activity site. All such means of communication shall be under the control of the inspected Party. The in-country escort shall ensure necessary lighting for inspectors at the inspection activity site to carry out the procedures provided for in this Protocol.
7. The inspected Party shall transport the inspection team, as well as its equipment and documents, from the point of entry to the inspection site no later than 24 hours after the time of the designation of the inspection site specified in the notification provided in accordance with Part Four of this Protocol.
8. During inspection activities, inspectors shall have the right to use any of the equipment in accordance with the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol for specific kinds of inspection activities, except for cameras, which shall be used only by the inspected Party at the request of the inspecting Party.
9. During inspection activities, inspectors shall have the right to view and make linear measurements of items located at the inspection activity site in order to confirm the accuracy of the declared technical data provided in accordance with Part Two of this Protocol. Such measurements shall be recorded during inspection activities and shall be certified by the signatures of an inspector and a member of the in- country escort immediately after they are taken. Such certified data shall be included in the inspection activity report.
10. For the purposes of this Protocol, an item of inspection, about which technical data has been provided in accordance with Part Two of this Protocol, is understood to mean:
(a) For inspections of heavy bombers at air bases, storage facilities for heavy bombers, and conversion or elimination facilities for heavy bombers within the boundaries depicted on the inspection site diagram, a heavy bomber of the inspected Party.
(b) For inspections at facilities other than those specified in subparagraph (a) of this paragraph, an ICBM or SLBM, a first stage of an ICBM or SLBM maintained, stored, and transported in stages, or a mobile launcher of ICBMs of the inspected Party.
11. For each Party, the size criteria used during inspections shall be provided in accordance with Part Two of this Protocol.
12. During an inspection, inspectors shall have the right to request clarification through the in-country escort. The in-country escort shall provide clarifications that may be useful in resolving questions and ambiguities. In the event questions and ambiguities relating to an object or building located within the inspection site are not resolved, the inspected Party shall photograph such object or such building at the request of the inspecting Party.
13. An inspection team conducting inspection activities shall include no more than ten inspectors. Upon arrival at the inspection activity site, the inspection team leader shall have the right to establish subgroups consisting of no fewer than two inspectors each.
14. Pre-inspection procedures, including safety briefings and the provision of information relating to the conduct of the inspection activities and the inspection activity site, shall begin upon arrival of the inspection team at the inspection activity site and shall be completed within one hour, after which the inspection activities shall begin immediately.
15. Upon completion of pre-inspection procedures, no object, container, or vehicle large enough to be or contain an item of inspection shall leave the inspection site until inspected by the inspection team or released by the inspection team if it does not intend to inspect such object, container, or vehicle. Such inspections shall be conducted so as not to hamper or delay the operation of the facility.
16. Periods of inspection activities shall be as follows:
(a) For Type One inspections at ICBM bases and submarine bases, the period of inspection activities for the inspection of reentry vehicles emplaced on deployed ICBMs or deployed SLBMs shall not exceed the period of time necessary to achieve the purpose of the inspection and shall terminate upon completion of the inspection procedures. The period of inspection activities for the inspection of non-deployed ICBMs, non-deployed SLBMs, and non-deployed launchers of ICBMs at such bases shall not exceed 24 hours after the completion of the inspection of reentry vehicles emplaced on deployed ICBMs or deployed SLBMs.
(b) For Type One inspections at air bases, the period of inspection activities shall not exceed 30 hours.
(c) For Type Two inspections, except for inspections provided for in subparagraph (d) of this paragraph, the period of inspection activities shall not exceed 24 hours.
(d) For Type Two inspections in order to confirm that solid-fueled ICBMs, solid-fueled SLBMs, silo launchers of ICBMs, or mobile launchers of ICBMs have been eliminated, or to confirm that SLBM launchers or heavy bombers have been converted, the period of inspection activities shall not exceed 12 hours.
(e) For exhibitions, the period of inspection activities shall not exceed the period of time necessary to achieve the purpose of the exhibition. For inspections, except for Type Two inspections in order to confirm that solid-fueled ICBMs, solid-fueled SLBMs, or mobile launchers of ICBMs have been eliminated, the period of inspection activities may be extended, by agreement with the in-country escort, by no more than eight hours.
17. Post-inspection procedures, which include completing the inspection activity report, shall begin when the period of inspection activities expires and shall be completed as agreed by the Parties.
18. The inspection team shall have the right to conduct sequential inspections. The inspection team that conducted an inspection at a facility shall not have the right to designate the same facility for conducting a sequential inspection. The procedures for conducting sequential inspections are set forth in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol.
19. The inspection team shall depart from the territory of the inspected Party no later than 24 hours after its return to the point of entry, unless otherwise agreed.

Section VI. Inspections of ICBMs and SLBMs Including the Warheads on Them, Deployed Heavy Bombers Including the Nuclear Armaments Located on Them, and Deployed and Non-deployed Launchers of ICBMs and Launchers of SLBMs, Conducted in Accordance with Paragraph 2 of Article XI of the Treaty (Type One Inspections)

1. Each Party shall have the right to conduct Type One inspections at the facilities, and for the purposes, listed in this paragraph:
(a) At ICBM bases, submarine bases, and air bases, in order to confirm the accuracy of the declared data, specified for such bases, on the number and types of deployed ICBMs, deployed SLBMs, or deployed heavy bombers, deployed and non- deployed launchers ofICBMs or launchers of SLBMs, non-deployed ICBMs or non-deployed SLBMs, on thenumber of warheads on deployed ICBMs or deployed SLBMs, or on the number of nuclear armaments located on deployed heavy bombers.
(b) At submarine bases, in order to confirm, as provided for in Part Nine of this Protocol, that converted launchers of SLBMs have not been reconverted and remain incapable of launching SLBMs. (cj At air bases, in order to confirm, as provided for in Part Nine of this Protocol, that the heavy bombers converted for non-nuclear armaments have not been reconverted and remain incapable of employing nuclear armaments.
2. Each Party shall have the right to conduct a total of no more than ten Type One inspections each year, with no more than two facilities being inspected twice each year. Neither Party shall have the right to conduct a Type One inspection simultaneously with other kinds of inspection activities at the same facility.
3. No later than one hour after the time for the designation of the inspection site specified in the notification provided earlier with respect to such an inspection in accordance with Part Four of this Protocol, the inspected Party shall implement the pre-inspection restrictions specified in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol at the ICBM base or submarine base, including the waters identified on the coastlines and waters diagram, or at the air base.
4. Inspections at ICBM bases, submarine bases, and air bases shall be conducted in order to confirm:
(a) The accuracy of the declared data on the number and types of deployed and non-deployed launchers of ICBMs located at the ICBM base, or on the number and types of deployed and non-deployed launchers of SLBMs located at the submarine base, at the time pre-inspection restrictions were implemented.
(b) The accuracy of the declared data on the number and types of deployed and non-deployed ICBMs located at the ICBM base, or on the number and types of deployed and non-deployed SLBMs located at the submarine base, or on the number and types of deployed heavy bombers located at the air base, at the time pre-inspection restrictions were implemented.
(c) The actual number of reentry vehicles emplaced on a designated deployed ICBM or emplaced on a designated deployed SLBM, or the number of nuclear armaments located on designated deployed heavy bombers.
5. Upon arrival of the inspection team at the inspection site, a member of the in-country escort shall provide to the inspection team leader, in writing, information on:
(a) For ICBM bases:
(i) The aggregate number of warheads on deployed ICBMs based at the ICBM base;
(ii) The number of deployed ICBMs of each type, based at the ICBM base;
(iii) The number of deployed launchers of ICBMs of each type located at the ICBM base at the time pre-inspection restrictions were implemented;
(iv) The number of reentry vehicles emplaced on each deployed ICBM;
(v) The number of non-deployed launchers of ICBMs of each type located at the ICBM base at the time pre-inspection restrictions were implemented; and
(vi) The number of non-deployed ICBMs of each type, first stages of ICBMs of each type, and fixed structures for mobile launchers of ICBMs located at the ICBM base at the time pre-inspection restrictions were implemented. In addition, a member of the in-country escort shall provide the inspection team leader with one copy of the simplified site diagram of the ICBM base, one copy of the inspection site diagram of the maintenance facility and, if applicable, one copy of the inspection site diagram of each basing area. The location of each of the declared items located at the ICBM base at the time pre-inspection restrictions were implemented shall be depicted on the site diagrams of facilities. For an ICBM base for mobile launchers of ICBMs, such information shall be provided only for those items located in basing areas and at the maintenance facility.
(b) For submarine bases:
(i) The aggregate number of warheads on deployed SLBMs contained in SLBM launchers installed on ballistic missile submarines based at the submarine base;
(ii) The number of ballistic missile submarines of each type based at the submarine base and the number of deployed SLBMs of each type;
(iii) The number of ballistic missile submarines of each type that contain deployed launchers of SLBMs and the number of deployed launchers of SLBMs of each type located at the submarine base at the time pre-inspection restrictions were implemented;
(iv) The number of reentry vehicles emplaced on each deployed SLBM;
(v) The number of ballistic missile submarines of each type based at the submarine base that contain non-deployed launchers of SLBMs and the number of non-deployed launchers of SLBMs of each type;
(vi) The number of ballistic missile submarines of each type that contain non-deployed launchers of SLBMs and the number of non-deployed launchers of SLBMs of each type located at the submarine base at the time pre-inspection restrictions were implemented; and
(vii) The number of non-deployed SLBMs of each type and first stages of SLBMs of each type located at the submarine base at the time pre-inspection restrictions were implemented. In addition, a member of the in-country escort shall provide the inspection team leader with one copy of the coastlines and waters diagram of the submarine base, one copy of the simplified site diagram of the submarine base, and one copy of the inspection site diagram of the location at which non-deployed SLBMs are stored. The location of each of the declared items located at the submarine base at the time pre- inspection restrictions were implemented shall be depicted on the coastlines and waters diagram of the submarine base and the inspection site diagram of the location at which non- deployed SLBMs are stored.
(c) For air bases:
(i) The aggregate number of nuclear warheads counted for deployed heavy bombers based at the air base;
(ii) The number of deployed heavy bombers of each type based at the air base;
(iii) The specific location inside the national territory of the inspected Party of each deployed heavy bomber based at the air base that was absent from that base at the time pre-inspection restrictions were implemented;
(iv) The specific geographic region outside the national territory of the inspected Party where each deployed heavy bomber based at the air base that was absent from that base at the time pre-inspection restrictions were implemented is located;
(v) The number and types of deployed heavy bombers, test heavy bombers, and heavy bombers equipped for non-nuclear armaments located at the air base at the time pre-inspection restrictions were implemented; and
(vi) The number of nuclear armaments located on each
deployed heavy bomber located at the air base at the time pre- inspection restrictions were implemented. In addition, a member of the in-country escort shall provide the inspection team leader with one copy of the inspection site diagram of the air base. The location of each of the declared heavy bombers located at the air base at the time pre-inspection restrictions were implemented shall be depicted on the inspection site diagram of the air base.
(d) The number and types of items specified for an ICBM base, submarine base, or air base that were absent from the inspection site at the time of the arrival of the inspectionteam and the reason for the absence of each such item.
(e) In addition, for submarine bases and air bases a member of the in-country escort shall provide to the inspection team leader, in writing, the information as provided for in Part Nine of this Protocol.
6. Upon completion of pre-inspection procedures, the inspection team leader shall designate for inspection, in writing, to a member of the in-country escort, using the geographic coordinates or pre-arranged designators or the site diagrams of facilities or coastlines and waters diagrams provided during pre-inspection procedures:
(a) For ICBM bases, one deployed launcher of ICBMs containing the deployed ICBM intended for inspection. The designated ICBM may be declared as containing reentry vehicles or as not containing reentry vehicles and thereafter shall be subject to inspection in order to confirm the declared number of reentry vehicles emplaced on it. In addition, the inspection team leader shall have the right to designate for inspection one non-deployed launcher of ICBMs. For an ICBM base for mobile launchers of ICBMs, the inspection team leader shall have the right to designate for inspection one fixed structure for mobile launchers of ICBMs, located in one of the basing areas that has been declared not to contain a deployed mobile launcher of ICBMs, if such fixed structures for mobile launchers of ICBMs not containing mobile launchers of ICBMs are located at that base. Mobile launchers of ICBMs located at a maintenance facility may not be designated for inspection to confirm the declared number of reentry vehicles emplaced on deployed ICBMs contained on such mobile launchers of ICBMs.
(b) For submarine bases, one deployed launcher of SLBMs containing the deployed SLBM intended for inspection. The designated SLBM may be declared as containing reentry vehicles or as not containing reentry vehicles and thereafter shall be subject to inspection in order to confirm the declared number of reentry vehicles emplaced on it. In addition, the inspection team leader shall have the right to designate for inspection one non-deployed launcher of SLBMs. SLBM launchers installed on a submarine located in dry dock may not be designated for inspection and shall not be subject to inspection.
(c) For air bases, no more than three deployed heavy bombers. Test heavy bombers may not be designated for inspection and shall not be subject to inspection.
(d) In addition, for submarine bases and air bases, the inspection team leader shall have the right to designate for inspection other items as provided for in Part Nine of this Protocol.
7. The inspected Party shall transport the inspection team to an ICBM launcher, SLBM launcher, fixed structure for mobile launchers of ICBMs, or deployed heavy bombers designated for inspection or to other items designated for inspection in accordance with Part Nine of this Protocol, without undue delay and within the following periods of time:
(a) To a silo launcher of ICBMs, no later than 12 hours after completion of pre-inspection procedures;
(b) To an SLBM launcher or converted launcher of SLBMs, no later than three hours after completion of pre-inspection procedures;
(c) To a mobile launcher of ICBMs or a fixed structure for mobile launchers of ICBMs, no later than five hours after completion of pre-inspection procedures; and
(d) To deployed heavy bombers or heavy bombers converted to heavy bombers equipped for non-nuclear armaments, no later than three hours after completion of pre-inspection procedures.
8. Inspectors shall have the right to read the unique identifiers on all designated deployed ICBMs or designated deployed SLBMs, non-deployed ICBMs, non-deployed SLBMs, and designated heavy bombers that are located at the inspection site, in accordance with the procedures provided for in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol.
9. The inspection team shall have the right to confirm that ICBMs or SLBMs declared to be training models of missiles are training models of missiles based on differences as provided for in Part Two of this Protocol, unless such items are contained in silo training launchers.
10. For ICBM bases, the inspection team shall have the right to inspect:
(a) The designated deployed launcher of ICBMs in order to confirm the number of reentry vehicles emplaced on the deployed ICBM contained on or in the launcher, as provided for in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol.
(b) If applicable, the designated non-deployed launcher of ICBMs or designated fixed structure for mobile launchers of ICBMs declared not to contain a mobile launcher of ICBMs, as provided for in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol.
(c) The maintenance facility in order to confirm the accuracy of the declared data on the number and types of items specified during pre-inspection procedures, as provided for in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol.
11. For submarine bases, the inspection team shall have the right to inspect:
(a) The designated deployed launcher of SLBMs in order to confirm the number of reentry vehicles emplaced on the deployed SLBM contained in the launcher, as provided for in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol.
(b) If applicable, the designated non-deployed launcher of SLBMs, as provided for in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol.
(c) The designated converted launchers of SLBMs, as provided for in Part Nine of the Protocol and in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol.
(d) The inspection site within the boundaries depicted on the inspection site diagram in order to confirm the accuracy of the declared data on the number and types of items specified during pre-inspection procedures, as provided for in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol.
12. For air bases, the inspection team shall have the right to inspect:
(a) The designated deployed heavy.bombers in order to confirm the number of nuclear armaments located on them, as provided for in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol.
(b) The designated heavy bombers equipped for non-nuclear armaments, as provided for in Part Nine of this Protocol and in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol.
(c) Structures within the boundaries depicted on the inspection site diagram of the air base declared not to contain a heavy bomber in order to confirm that such structures do not contain a heavy bomber.
13. If an inspection team conducting an inspection of a designated launcher of ICBMs or launcher of S,LBMs declared not to contain a deployed ICBM or deployed SLBM, or a fixed structure for mobile launchers of ICBMs declared not to contain a deployed mobile launcher of ICBMs, discovers that such a launcher or such a fixed structure for mobile launchers of ICBMs contains a deployed ICBM or a deployed SLBM, the inspection team shall have the right to inspect the discovered ICBM or SLBM in order to determine the number of reentry vehicles emplaced on such a deployed ICBM or deployed SLBM in addition to any other designated launchers, and to record the results of such an inspection in the inspection activity report. If an inspection team conducting an inspection of a designated deployed heavy bomber declared not to contain nuclear armaments discovers that such a heavy bomber contains nuclear armaments, the inspection team shall have the right to inspect such a deployed heavy bomber in order to determine the number of nuclear armaments located on such a heavy bomber, as provided for in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol, and to record the results of such an inspection in the inspection activity report.
14. For a deployed ICBM or deployed SLBM that was designated for the inspection of reentry vehicles, before the front section is viewed, the inspected Party may cover reentry vehicles and other equipment, including the mounting platform, with individual covers, in such a manner that the covers shall not hamper inspectors in ascertaining that the front section contains the number of reentry vehicles equal to the number of reentry vehicles declared for the deployed ICBM or deployed SLBM. Inspectors shall have the right to view such covers prior to their placement on the reentry vehicles. The inspection team shall conduct an inspection of reentry vehicles emplaced on a deployed ICBM or deployed SLBM as provided for in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol.
15. The time of completion of the procedures for the inspection of reentry vehicles for all designated launchers of ICBMs or launchers of SLBMs shall be agreed upon by the inspection team leader and a member of the in-country escort and shall be recorded in the inspection activity report.
16. Upon completion of the procedures provided for in this Section, the inspected Party shall transport the inspection team to the location designated by the inspected Party to conduct post-inspection procedures.

Section VII. Inspections of Non-deployed Strategic Offensive Arms, Converted or Eliminated Strategic Offensive Arms, Deployed Heavy Bombers at Storage Facilities for Heavy Bombers, and Formerly Declared Facilities, Conducted in Accordance with Paragraph 3 of Article XI of the Treaty (Type Two Inspections)

1. Each Party shall have the right to conduct Type Two inspections at the facilities, and for the purposes, listed in this paragraph:
(a) At ICBM loading facilities; SLBM loading facilities; storage facilities for ICBMs, SLBMs, and mobile launchers of ICBMs; repair facilities for ICBMs, SLBMs, and mobile launchers of ICBMs; test ranges; and training facilities, in order to confirm the accuracy of declared technical characteristics and declared data, specified for such facilities, on the number and types of non-deployed ICBMs and non-deployed SLBMs, first stages of ICBMs and SLBMs, and non- deployed launchers of ICBMs.
(b) At formerly declared facilities, which are provided for in Part Two of this Protocol and were subject to inspection prior to their elimination, in order to confirm that such facilities are not being used for purposes inconsistent with the Treaty. If heavy bombers converted for non-nuclear armaments are based at formerly declared facilities, inspections shall be conducted in accordance with Part Nine of this Protocol in order to confirm that such heavy bombers remain incapable of employing nuclear armaments.
(c) At ICBM bases for silo launchers of ICBMs, in order to confirm that silo launchers of ICBMs have been eliminated in accordance with Part Three of this Protocol. During such inspections, no other items and no other portions of such ICBM bases shall be subject to inspection.
(d) At submarine bases, in order to confirm that SLBM launchers installed on ballistic missile submarines have been converted in accordance with Part Three of this Protocol. During such inspections, no other items and no other portions of such submarine bases shall be subject to inspection.
(e) At conversion or elimination facilities for ICBMs, SLBMS, or mobile launchers of ICBMs, in order to confirm that solid-fueled ICBMs, solid-fueled SLBMs, or mobile launchers of ICBMs have been eliminated in accordance with Part Three of this Protocol.
(f) At conversion or elimination facilities for heavy bombers, in order to confirm that heavy bombers equipped for nuclear armaments have been converted in accordance with Part Three of this Protocol.
(g) At storage facilities for heavy bombers, in order to confirm the accuracy of declared data, specified for such facilities, on the number and types of deployed and non- deployed heavy bombers and on the number of nuclear armaments located on such heavy bombers, in accordance with Part Nine of this Protocol.
2. Except as provided for in Part Nine of this Protocol, each Party shall have the right to conduct a total of no more than eight Type Two inspections each year, with no more than two such inspections being conducted each year at the same facility.
3. No later than one hour after the time for the designation of the inspection site specified in the notification provided earlier with respect to such an inspection in accordance with Part Four of this Protocol, the inspected Party shall implement, at the designated inspection site, the pre- inspection restrictions specified in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol, which shall remain in effect until the pre-inspection procedures are completed.
4. Type Two inspections in order to confirm that solid-fueled ICBMs, solid-fueled SLBMs, or mobile launchers of ICBMs have been eliminated shall be conducted after receiving notification in accordance with Part Four of this Protocol from the Party carrying out the elimination of such items:
(a) During the period of time specified in the corresponding notification, when eliminated solid-fueled missiles or eliminated mobile launchers of ICBMs are accumulated at a conversion or elimination facility in a quantity defined in this paragraph; or
(b) At any other period of time, not coinciding with the accumulation specified in subparagraph (a) of this paragraph. In such a case, eliminated solid-fueled missiles or eliminated mobile launchers of ICBMs are not accumulated. Only those eliminated solid-fueled missiles or eliminated mobile launchers of ICBMs located at the conversion or elimination facility at that time shall be subject to inspection. A Party carrying out an elimination of solid-fueled ICBMs, solid-fueled SLBMs, or mobile launchers of ICBMs shall conduct, within a calendar year, two accumulations of eliminated solid-fueled missiles and two accumulations of eliminated mobile launchers of ICBMs at the appropriate conversion or elimination facility. These accumulations shall be conducted in such a manner that no less than 50 percent of the total number of missiles and no less than 50 percent of the total number of mobile launchers of ICBMs scheduled for elimination during a calendar year will be made available for inspection during the two inspections conducted during the period of time specified in subparagraph (a) of this paragraph at each appropriate facility. Each such accumulation shall contain approximately 25 percent of the total number of solid-fueled ICBMs or solid-fueled SLBMs, or approximately 25 percent of the total number ofmobile launchers of ICBMs, scheduled for elimination during the corresponding calendar year. The Party conducting the accumulation of eliminated solid- fueled ICBMs, solid-fueled SLBMs, or eliminated mobile launchers of ICBMs shall provide a notification, in accordance with Part Four of this Protocol, of the beginning of such an accumulation. The Party conducting such an accumulation shall also inform the other Party, in a notification provided in accordance with Part Four of this Protocol, of the date of completion of the accumulation process, the number of eliminated solid-fueled ICBMs or solid-fueled SLBMs, or the number of eliminated mobile launchers of ICBMs, as well as the unique identifiers of the eliminated solid-fueled ICBMs or solid-fueled SLBMs.
5. Upon arrival of the inspection team at the inspection site, a member of the in-country escort shall provide the inspection team leader, in writing, information on the number, and, as applicable, on the type, category, variant, and version of:
(a) For facilities specified in subparagraphs l(a) and l(b) of this Section, non-deployed ICBMs, non-deployed SLBMs, first stages of ICBMs and SLBMs, test launchers, training launchers, and non-deployed launchers of ICBMs located at that inspection site at the time pre-inspection restrictions were implemented. At the same time, a member of the in-country escort shall provide the inspection team leader with one copy of the simplified site diagram of the facility, if applicable, and one copy of the inspection site diagram. The inspection site diagram shall be annotated to depict, if applicable, the location, within the boundaries of the inspection site, of such items and the structures or vehicles in which they are located. If any of the items specified in accordance with Part Two of this Protocol for an inspection site are absent from the inspection site at the time of the arrival of the inspection team at the inspection site, a member of the in- country escort shall inform the inspection team leader of the type and, if applicable, variant, and the reason for the absence of each such item.
(b) For facilities specified in subparagraph l(c) of this Section, eliminated silo launchers of ICBMs that are subject to inspection. At the same time, a member of the in-country escort shall provide the inspection team leader with one copy of the simplified site diagram of the ICBM base, annotated to depict the location of each such silo launcher of ICBMs.
(c) For facilities specified in subparagraph 1 (d) of this Section, converted launchers of SLBMs that are subject to inspection. At the same time, a member of the in-country escort shall provide the inspection team leader with one copy of the coastlines and waters diagram, annotated to depict the location of the ballistic missile submarines on which such converted launchers of SLBMs are installed.
(d) For facilities specified in subparagraph l(e) of this Section, eliminated solid-fueled ICBMs, solid-fueled SLBMs, or eliminated mobile launchers of ICBMs that are subject to inspection. At the same time, a member of the in-country escort shall provide the inspection team leader with one copy of the inspection site diagram, annotated to depict the location of such eliminated items and the structures or vehicles in which they are located.
(e) For facilities specified in subparagraph l(f) of this Section, converted heavy bombers that are subject to inspection. At the same time, a member of the in-country escort shall provide the inspection team leader with one copy of the inspection site diagram, annotated to depict the location of such converted heavy bombers and the structures in which they are located.
(f) For facilities specified in subparagraph l(g) of this Section, heavy bombers located at the inspection site at the time pre-inspection restrictions were implemented.
6. The inspection team shall have the right to inspect, in accordance with procedures provided for in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol:
(a) For ICBM loading facilities, SLBM loading facilities, storage facilities for ICBMs, SLBMs, and mobile launchers of ICBMs; repair facilities for ICBMs, SLBMs, and mobile launchers of ICBMs; test ranges; training facilities; and formerly declared facilities other than formerly declared facilities at which heavy bombers converted for non-nuclear armaments are based, the inspection site within the boundaries of the inspection site, including structures large enough to contain an item of inspection. For test ranges the same procedures shall apply, with the following exceptions:
(i) In carrying out the procedures provided for in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol, the inspected Party shall not be required to remove non-deployed ICBMs or non-deployed SLBMs from test launchers or soft-site launchers. Such non-deployed ICBMs or non-deployed SLBMs shall not be subject to measurement.
(ii) For silo test launchers of ICBMs, regardless of where they are depicted on the simplified site diagram of the test range, the inspection team shall have the right to inspect, at its choice, no more than one silo test launcher of ICBMs that the inspected Party declares not to contain an ICBM or a training model of a missile. Inspection of such a silo launcher of ICBMs shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures provided for in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol in order to confirm that it does not contain an ICBM.
(b) For formerly declared facilities at which heavy bombers converted for non-nuclear armaments are based, designated converted heavy bombers, in accordance with Part Nine of this Protocol.
(c) For ICBM bases for silo launchers of ICBMs, eliminated silo launchers of ICBMs, in order to confirm that such silo launchers of ICBMs have been eliminated in accordance with Part Three of this Protocol, and the number of such eliminated silo launchers of ICBMs declared during pre- inspection procedures.
(d) For submarine bases, converted launchers of SLBMs, in order to confirm that such SLBM launchers have been converted in accordance with Part Three of this Protocol, and the number of such converted launchers of SLBMs declared during pre- inspection procedures.
(e) For conversion or elimination facilities for ICBMs, SLBMs, or mobile launchers of ICBMs, eliminated solid-fueled ICBMs, eliminated solid-fueled SLBMs, or eliminated mobile launchers of ICBMs, in order to confirm that such items have been eliminated in accordance with Part Three of this Protocol, and the number of such eliminated items declared during pre-inspection procedures.
(f) For conversion or elimination facilities for heavy bombers, heavy bombers converted for non-nuclear armaments, in order to confirm that such heavy bombers have been converted in accordance with Part Three of this Protocol, and the number of such converted heavy bombers declared during pre-inspection procedures.
(g) For storage facilities for heavy bombers, all deployed heavy bombers, in accordance with Part Nine of this Protocol.
7. Inspectors shall have the right to read the unique identifiers on all non-deployed ICBMs, non-deployed SLBMs, eliminated solid-fueled ICBMs, eliminated solid-fueled SLBMs, as well as on all heavy bombers, located at the inspection site, except for ICBMs or SLBMs contained in test launchers and in soft-site launchers of ICBMs and SLBMs.
8. The inspection team shall have the right to confirm that all launch canisters located within the boundaries of the inspection site declared to be empty are, in fact, empty.
9. Notwithstanding other provisions of this Protocol, silo training launchers of ICBMs and test heavy bombers shall not be subject to inspection.
10. The inspection team shall have the right to confirm that ICBMs or SLBMs declared to be training models of missiles are training models of missiles based on differences as provided for in Part Two of this Protocol, unless such items are contained in test launchers or in silo training launchers.

Section VIII. Exhibitions

1. Exhibitions shall be conducted at the invitation of the Party conducting the exhibition, separately from inspections, at the locations and in theperiods of time chosen by the Party conducting the exhibition, and in accordance with the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol.
2. Each Party shall conduct exhibitions, and shall have the right to take part in exhibitions conducted by the other Party, in order to demonstrate the distinguishing features and to confirm technical characteristics of each new type, variant, or version of an ICBM, SLBM, heavy bomber equipped for nuclear armaments, and, as provided for in Part Two of this Protocol, an ICBM launcher, in the periods of time specified in corresponding notifications. If a Party declares a type, variant, or version of a strategic offensive arm prior to or at the time of entry into force of the Treaty for which no exhibition had been previously conducted in connection with fulfilling the requirements of the START Treaty, that Party shall conduct an exhibition. Such an exhibition shall be conducted no later than the date on which inspection activities begin, as provided for in Section I of this Part.
3. Each Party shall conduct exhibitions, and shall have the right to take part in exhibitions conducted by the other Party, in order to demonstrate the results of the conversion of the first item of a type of ICBM launcher, SLBM launcher, or heavy bomber equipped for nuclear armaments that was converted using conversion procedures in accordance with Part Three of this Protocol in the periods of time specified in corresponding notifications.
4. Each Party shall conduct exhibitions, and shall have the right to take part in exhibitions conducted by the other Party, as provided for in Part Nine of this Protocol.

Section IX. Cancellation of Inspection Activities

1. An inspection activity shall be cancelled if, due to circumstances brought about by force majeure, it cannot be conducted. If an inspection is cancelled due to circumstances brought about by force majeure, the number of inspections to which the inspecting Party is entitled shall not be reduced. For exhibitions cancelled due to circumstances brought about by force majeure, the Parties shall agree on the new periods of time for conducting such exhibitions.
2. In the case of a delay, including a delay due to circumstances brought about by force majeure, that prevents an inspection team from arriving at the inspection site during the time specified in paragraph 7 of Section V of this Part, the inspection team leader may cancel or conduct the inspection. If an inspection is canceled for that reason, the number of inspections to which the inspecting Party is entitled shall not be reduced.
3. At the inspection site, if the time to transport an inspection team or subgroup exceeds the corresponding time specified in paragraph 7 of Section VI of this Part, the inspection team leader may cancel or conduct the inspection. If an inspection is canceled for that reason, the number of inspections to which the inspecting Party is entitled shall not be reduced.
4. If, due to circumstances brought about by force majeure, it is necessary to remove items subject to pre-inspection restrictions from the inspection site, the inspection team leader may cancel or conduct the inspection. If an inspection is canceled for that reason, the number of inspections to which the inspecting Party is entitled shall not be reduced.
5. If the inspected Party interrupts the inspection for reasons of personnel security or equipment safety, the inspection team leader may cancel or conduct the inspection. If an inspection is canceled for such reasons, the number of inspections to which the inspecting Party is entitled shall not be reduced.

Section X. Inspection Activity Reports

1. During post-inspection procedures, the inspection team leader shall provide the in-country escort with an inspection activity report in written form, in two originals, each in the English and Russian languages.
2. The report shall contain factual information. It shall indicate the kind of inspection activities conducted, the inspection activity site, the type and number of strategic offensive arms subject to the Treaty that were declared during the pre-inspection procedures and that were observed during the period of inspection activities, and all measurements recorded during the period of inspection activities.
3. Site diagrams of facilities, coastlines and waters diagrams, and information provided, in writing, to the inspection team leader during pre-inspection procedures, as well as photographs taken during the period of inspection activities, shall be an integral part of the inspection activity report. The report shall be signed by the inspection team leader and by a member of the in-country escort. The inspecting Party shall have the right to include in the report ambiguities or comments. The inspected Party shall have the right to include clarifications in the report. Each Party shall retain one original of the report.
4. The Parties shall, when possible, clarify ambiguities regarding factual information contained in the inspection activity report. Relevant clarifications shall be recorded in the report.

PART SIX -BILATERAL CONSULTATIVE COMMISSION

Section I. Authority of the Bilateral Consultative Commission (BCC)

To promote the implementation of the provisions of the Treaty, the Parties within the framework of the BCC shall:
(a) Resolve questions relating to compliance with the obligations assumed by the Parties.
(b) Agree upon such additional measures as may be necessary to improve the viability and effectiveness of the Treaty.
(c) Discuss the unique features of missiles and their launchers, other than ICBMs and ICBM launchers, or SLBMs and SLBM launchers, referred to in paragraph 3 of Article V of the Treaty, that distinguish such missiles and their launchers from ICBMs and ICBM launchers, or SLBMs and SLBM launchers.
(d) Resolve questions related to the applicability of provisions of the Treaty to a new kind of strategic offensive arm.
(e) Discuss other issues raised by either Party.

Section 11. Composition

1. Each Party shall communicate to the other Party through diplomatic channels the names of its designated Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner to the BCC.
2. Each Party shall have the right to be represented at a session of the BCC by its Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner as well as by their alternates, members, advisors, and experts. A session of the BCC may be convened without the participation of the Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner. In such a case, any other individual provided for in this paragraph may be the head representative of the Party to a session of the BCC.
3. The BCC shall have the right to constitute working groups consisting of any of the individuals provided for in paragraph
2 of this Section for the consideration of specific questions raised in the BCC.

Section 111. Convening a Session

1. A session of the BCC shall be convened at the request of either Party. No later than 15 days after receiving such a request, the requested Party shall submit a response. Requests and responses shall include the following:
(a) The questions that the Party intends to raise.
(b) The name of the Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner, or the head representative of the Party.
(c) The proposed, accepted or alternate date and location for the convening of the session. Each Party may also submit additional questions to the other Party prior to the convening of the session. No fewer than two sessions of the BCC shall be convened each year, unless otherwise agreed.
2. A session of the BCC shall be convened not later than 45 days after the date proposed in the request provided for in paragraph 1 of this Section.
3. A session of the BCC shall be convened in Geneva, Switzerland, and shall remain in session for no more than 15 days, unless otherwise agreed.
4. The Commissioners of the Parties may communicate with each other during the intersessional period in order to clarify any unclear situations or to resolve questions.

Section IV. Agenda

1. The agenda for a session of the BCC shall consist of those questions that the Parties have specified in the communications provided to each other in accordance with paragraph 1 of Section I11 of this Part.
2. Each Party shall have the right to raise in the BCC questions that arise during a session of the BCC, provided, however, that consideration of such questions during the current session requires agreement of the Parties. In case of such agreement, the Parties shall allow sufficient time prior to consideration of such questions for preparation and for any changes in the composition of their delegations.

Section V. Work of the BCC

The work of the BCC shall be confidential, except as otherwise agreed by the BCC. The BCC may record agreements reached or the results of its work in an appropriate document, which shall be done in two originals, each in the English and Russian languages, both texts being equally authentic. Such documents shall not be confidential, except as otherwise agreed by the BCC.

Section VI. Costs

Each Party shall bear the cost of its participation in the work of the BCC.

Section VII. Communications

Communications in accordance with this Part shall be provided through diplomatic channels or through the Nuclear Risk Reduction Centers of the Parties.

Section VIII. Additional Procedures

The Parties shall have the right to agree upon additional procedures governing the operation of the BCC.

PART SEVEN -TELEMETRIC INFORMATION

1. The Parties shall exchange telemetric information on an equal number of launches of ICBMs and SLBMs, but on no more than five launches of ICBMs and SLBMs each calendar year.
2. On an annual basis, within 65 days of the beginning of the calendar year, within the framework of the BCC, the Parties shall discuss the issue of the exchange of telemetric information on launches of ICBMs and SLBMs, focusing on launches conducted in the previous calendar year, on which an exchange of telemetric information will be carried out. Following discussion within the framework of the BCC, the Parties shall take an agreed decision on the number of such launches. The specific launches of ICBMs and SLBMs, on which telemetric information is provided, shall be determined by the conducting Party.
3. The conditions of and the procedures for the exchange, and the amount of telemetric information provided shall be determined in accordance with the Annex on Telemetric Information to this Protocol.

PART EIGHT -PROVISIONAL APPLICATION

Section I. General Provisions

Until entry into force of the Treaty, the provisions of the Treaty and this Protocol, listed in this Part, shall apply provisionally from the date of signature of the Treaty.

Section 11. The Treaty

1. Paragraph 2 of Article I.
2. Paragraph 8 of Article 111.
3. Paragraph 2 of Article V.
4. Paragraph 1 of Article VI.
5. Paragraph 1 of Article VII.
6. Paragraph 2 of Article VII, only to the extent required to provide the notifications provided for in this Part.
7. Paragraph 3 of Article VII.
8. Paragraph 4 of Article VII.
9. Paragraph 5 of Article VII.
10. Paragraph 6 of Article VII.
11. Article VIII.
12. Article X.
13. Article XII.

Section 111. The Protocol

1. Part One.
2. Paragraphs 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 of Section I of Part Two.
3. Paragraph 3 of Section IX of Part Two.
4. Part Three, only to the extent required for the implementation of this Part, but not to provide notifications on conversion or elimination or to make eliminated items visible to national technical means of verification.
5. Paragraphs 1 and 2 of Section I of Part Four.
6. Paragraphs 5 and 6 of Section I11 of Part Four.
7. Paragraph 1 of Section IV of Part Four.
8. Section VII of Part Four.
9. Part Six.
10. Section I of Part Eight.

PART NINE -AGREED STATEMENTS

First Agreed Statement

Converted B-1B Heavy Bombers

The Parties agree that, with respect to all B-1B heavy bombers equipped for nuclear armaments converted to heavy bombers equipped for non-nuclear armaments, and the facilities at which they are based, the following provisions shall apply.
1. No later than one year after entry into force of the Treaty, the United States of America shall conduct a one-time exhibition of a B-1B heavy bomber equipped for non-nuclear armaments to demonstrate that the B-1B heavy bomber is incapable of employing nuclear armaments:
(a) Such an exhibition shall be conducted, as applicable, in accordance with the procedures of an exhibition specified in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol, as provided for in Section VIII of Part Five of this Protocol, to demonstrate the features that distinguish a heavy bomber equipped for nuclear armaments from a heavy bomber equipped for non-nuclear armaments converted in accordance with the procedures provided for in Part Three of this Protocol.
(b) On the basis of the results of the exhibition of the differences between a heavy bomber equipped for nuclear armaments and a heavy bomber equipped for non-nuclear armaments, the distinguishing features shall be recorded in the inspection activity report and shall be applied thereafter for identification of B-1B heavy bombers equipped for non-nuclear armaments.
(c) All B-1B heavy bombers that have been converted prior to the completion of such an exhibition and that have the recorded distinguishing features shall be included in the category of heavy bombers equipped for non-nuclear armaments.
2. Upon completion of the conversion of the last B-1B heavy bomber to a heavy bomber equipped for non-nuclear armaments, with respect to all such converted B-1B heavy bombers and the eliminated facilities at which they are based, the following procedures shall apply:
(a) The United States of America shall notify the Russian Federation that Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, United States of America, and Dyess Air Force Base, Texas, United States of America, have been eliminated when all B-1B heavy bombers based there have been converted to heavy bombers equipped for non-nuclear armaments.
(b) Eliminated facilities where converted B-1B heavy bombers are based may be inspected as formerly declared facilities. Such inspections shall fall within the annual quota for Type Two inspections established in Section VII of Part Five of this Protocol. No more than one such inspection may be conducted each year at either Ellsworth Air Force Base or Dyess Air Force Base.
(c) During the inspection, in order to confirm the distinguishing features of the designated B-1B heavy bombers that indicate that the designated B-1B heavy bomber remains incapable of employing nuclear armaments, the Russian Federation shall use inspection procedures in accordance with the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol as provided for in Section VII of Part Five of this Protocol, with the following changes:
(i) At the point of entry, which for such an inspection is Travis Air Force Base, California, United States of America, the inspection team that has designated either Ellsworth Air Force Base or Dyess Air Force Base for a formerly declared facility inspection shall be provided information on the number of B-1B heavy bombers located at the base at that time. If less than 50 percent of such heavy bombers based at that base are present, the inspection team leader shall have the right to:
(A) Inform a member of the in-country escort that the inspection of the designated base shall take place; or
(B) Designate another inspection site associated with the same point of entry; or
(C) Decline to conduct the inspection and leave the territory of the inspected Party. In this event the number of such inspections to which the inspecting Party is entitled shall not be reduced.
(ii) Upon the arrival of the inspection team at the formerly declared facility, a member of the in-country escort shall provide the inspection team leader with an inspection site diagram of the formerly declared facility annotated to depict the location of each of the B-1B heavy bombers located at the base;
(iii) Upon completion of the pre-inspection procedures, the inspection team leader shall designate for inspection no more than three B-1B heavy bombers equipped for non-nuclear armaments;
(iv) The inspection team shall have the right to inspect each of the three designated B-1B heavy bombers to confirm that these heavy bombers remain incapable of employing nuclear armaments; and
(v) The results of such an inspection shall be recorded in the inspection activity report.
3. Upon completion of the conversion of all B-1B heavy bombers equipped for nuclear armaments to heavy bombers equipped for non-nuclear armaments, such converted heavy
bombers shall not be subject to a Type One inspection when those heavy bombers are present at an air base at the time pre-inspection restrictions were implemented at the base.
4. If either Party decides to convert all heavy bombers of another type that are equipped for nuclear armaments to heavy bombers equipped for non-nuclear armaments, such heavy bombers converted in accordance with Part Three of this Protocol shall also be subject to the aforementioned verification measures.

Second Agreed Statement

U.S. Submarines Equipped with Launchers of Cruise Missiles Converted from Ballistic Missile Submarines The Parties agree that the following provisions shall apply to the U.S. submarines equipped with launchers of cruise missiles converted from ballistic missile submarines, known to the United States of America as “SSGNs” and to the Russian Federation as “PLARK”:
1. In order to provide assurances that all four U.S. SSGNs are incapable of launching SLBMs, the following provisions shall apply with respect to such submarines:
(a) No later than three years after entry into force of the Treaty, the United States of America shall conduct an initial one-time exhibition of each of these four SSGNs. The purpose of such exhibitions shall be to confirm that the launchers on such submarines are incapable of launching SLBMs. Such an exhibition shall be conducted in order to confirm that that an SLBM launcher has been converted, as provided for in Section VIII of Part Five of this Protocol, and, as applicable, in accordance with the procedures for an exhibition specified in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol.
(b) After completion of the initial exhibitions, the United States of America shall periodically provide an opportunity for the Russian Federation to confirm that none of the launchers on the four SSGNs has been reconverted and each of them remains incapable of launching an SLBM. In order to provide assurances that the launchers on such a submarine have not been reconverted and remain incapable of launching SLBMs,
the Russian Federation shall have the right, while conducting a Type One inspection at a submarine base, to inspect the designated launchers on an SSGN if such a submarine is located at the submarine base. Throughout the duration of the Treaty, the number of such inspections shall not exceed a total of six inspections for all four SSGNs existing at the time of entry into force of the Treaty, and the number of such inspections shall not exceed two inspections for each SSGN. The coastlines and waters diagram of the inspected submarine base, provided during the pre-inspection procedures, shall depict the locations of all ballistic missile submarines and SSGNs located at that time at the submarine base.
(c) An inspection of a launcher on an SSGN shall be conducted in accordance with Part Five of this Protocol and in accordance with procedures provided for in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol for conducting an inspection of an SLBM launcher that does not contain a deployed SLBM, with the following changes:
(i) The SSGNs at the designated submarine base shall be subject to pre-inspection restrictions specified in paragraph 3 of Section VI of Part Five of this Protocol and shall be subject to inspection. After pre-inspection restrictions were implemented, no temporary shelters shall be installed over the launchers on the SSGN. If temporary shelters were installed before pre-inspection restrictions were implemented, the launchers on an SSGN under these shelters shall not be subject to inspection. The total number of such launchers on a single SSGN that are not subject to inspection because they are undersuch shelters shall not exceed eight launchers;
(ii) Upon arrival of the inspection team at the submarine base, a member of the in-country escort shall provide to the inspection team leader, in writing, in addition to the information provided for in subparagraph 5(b) of Section VI of Part Five of this Protocol, information on the number of SSGNs subject to inspection pursuant to this Agreed Statement and on the number of launchers on those submarines;
(iii) The inspection team leader shall have the right to designate for inspection two launchers on an SSGN, if an SSGN is located at that base, instead of one non-deployed launcher of SLBMs;
(iv) The inspection team shall have the right to inspect the designated launchers on the SSGN in order to confirm that the designated launchers remain incapable of launching SLBMs; and
(v) The results of such an inspection shall be recorded in the inspection activity report.
2. If either Party converts a ballistic missile submarine to a submarine equipped with launchers of cruise missiles, such a submarine shall be subject to the measures specified in this Agreed Statement, and an additional number of inspections shall be agreed within the framework of the BCC.

Third Agreed Statement

Joint Basing of Heavy Bombers Equipped for Nuclear Armaments and Heavy Bombers Equipped for Non-nuclear Armaments

The Parties agree that, notwithstanding paragraph 9 of Article IV of the Treaty, each Party shall have the right, at an air base, to carry out joint basing of heavy bombers of a type equipped for nuclear armaments and heavy bombers of the same type that have been converted to heavy bombers equipped for non-nuclear armaments in accordance with Part Three of this Protocol, until the last heavy bomber of such a type has been converted to a heavy bomber equipped for non-nuclear armaments.
1. All heavy bombers of a type located at an air base at which joint basing of heavy bombers is carried out shall be subject to inspection until the last heavy bomber of that type equipped for nuclear armaments has been converted to a heavy bomber of the same type equipped for non-nuclear armaments. In this connection, an inspection of heavy bombers declared during pre-inspection procedures to be equipped for nuclear armaments shall fall within the annual inspection quota for Type One inspections established in Section VI of Part Five of this Protocol. During the same inspection, heavy bombers of the same type declared to be converted heavy bombers may be inspected in order to confirm that they have not been reconverted and remain incapable of employing nuclear armaments.
2. The inspection of an air base at which heavy bombers equipped for nuclear armaments and heavy bombers of the same type converted to heavy bombers equipped for non-nuclear armaments are jointly based shall be conducted in accordance with Part Five of this Protocol, using the following modified Type One inspection procedures:
(a) If the inspection team has designated for inspection such an air base, a member of the in-country escort shall provide to the inspection team leader, in addition to the information specified in paragraph 6 of Section IV of Part Five of this Protocol that pertains to deployed heavy bombers of a type, information on the number of heavy bombers of the same type converted to heavy bombers equipped for non-nuclear armaments located at that time at that air base;
(b) The heavy bombers equipped for nuclear armaments and the heavy bombers of the same type converted to heavy bombers equipped for non-nuclear armaments located at that air base shall be subject to the pre-inspection restrictions specified in paragraph 3 of Section VI of Part Five of this Protocol;
(c) Upon the arrival of the inspection team at the air base, a member of the in-country escort shall provide to the inspection team leader, in writing, in addition to the information provided for in subparagraph 5(c) of Section VI of Part Five of this Protocol, information on the number and type of heavy bombers converted into heavy bombers equipped for non-nuclear armaments located at the air base at the time pre-inspection restrictions were implemented. In addition, an inspection site diagram of the air base, depicting the location of all such heavy bombers converted to heavy bombers equipped for non-nuclear armaments, shall be provided;
(d) Upon completion of the pre-inspection procedures, the inspection team leader shall designate for inspection no more than three deployed heavy bombers depicted on the inspection site diagram of the air base. The inspection team shall have the right to inspect the designated deployed heavy bombers in order to confirm the number of nuclear armaments located on them;
(e) In addition, the inspection team shall have the right to inspect, if so designated, no more than two heavy bombers of the same type converted to heavy bombers equipped for non- nuclear armaments in order to confirm that such heavy bombers remain incapable of employing nuclear armaments; and
(f) The results of such an inspection shall be recorded in the inspection activity report.

Fourth Agreed Statement

Deployed Heavy Bombers Located at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base

The Parties agree that U.S. heavy bombers equipped for nuclear armaments awaiting conversion or elimination may be located at the storage facility for heavy bombers at Davis- Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona, United States of America. Each such heavy bomber shall remain based at a declared air base and shall be considered to be a deployed heavy bomber until it is converted or eliminated in accordance with Part Three of this Protocol.
1. In order to provide assurances that deployed heavy bombers located at the storage facility for heavy bombers at Davis- Monthan Air Force Base do not have nuclear armaments located on them, the following provisions shall apply.
2. For the purposes of this Agreed Statement, the term “environmentally-sealed heavy bomber” means a heavy bomber that has undergone the process of comprehensive sealing of an aircraft in a manner that protects it from the effects of dust, humidity, sunlight, and extreme temperatures, which may include the sealing of access panels, doors, plates, and other small openings.
3. In order to confirm that the environmentally-sealed heavy bomber has no nuclear armaments on board, no later than 120 days after entry into force of the Treaty, the United States of America shall conduct a one-time exhibition of one environmentally-sealed deployed heavy bomber of each type located at the storage facility at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base. Such an exhibition shall be conducted in accordance with Part Five of this Protocol and the procedures set forth in this paragraph after receipt of the appropriate notifications:
(a) Upon the arrival of the inspection team at the storage facility, a member of the in-country escort shall provide to the inspection team leader, in writing, information on the number and types of environmentally-sealed deployed heavy bombers located at the storage facility. In addition, an inspection site diagram of the storage facility for heavy bombers, annotated to depict the location of all such heavy bombers, shall be provided.
(b) Upon completion of the pre-inspection procedures, the inspection team leader shall designate for exhibition no more than one environmentally-sealed deployed heavy bomber of each type depicted on the inspection site diagram of the storage facility for heavy bombers.
(c) Upon the arrival of the inspection team at a designated heavy bomber, the in-country escort shall prepare the heavy bomber for viewing. The inspection team shall have the right to maintain uninterrupted visual contact with each designated heavy bomber while that heavy bomber is being prepared for viewing.
(d) During the exhibition:
(i) The inspection team shall have the right to inspect a designated environmentally-sealed deployed heavy bomber of each type by viewing the interior of the weapons bays of such a heavy bomber from a location designated by the in-country escort, in order to confirm that such a heavy bomber does not have nuclear armaments located on it.
(ii) For all remaining environmentally-sealed deployed heavy bombers declared during pre-inspection procedures, the inspection team shall have the right to view the exterior of each such heavy bomber in order to confirm the comprehensive sealing of the airplane and to read the unique identifier on it.
(iii) Except for heavy bombers designated for further inspection in accordance with subparagraph (i) of this subparagraph, the inspection team shall not have the right to view the interior portions of any other environmentally-sealed heavy bomber.
(e) After the exhibition, the inspection team shall apply, in a manner agreed by the Parties, unique tamper-proof seals to all weapons bays of each environmentally-sealed heavy bomber that has been inspected.
(f) The results of such an exhibition, including unique identifiers of heavy bombers and the locations of unique tamper-proof seals, shall be recorded in the inspection activity report.
4. After the exhibition provided for in paragraph 3 of this Agreed Statement has been conducted, deployed heavy bombers located at the storage facility shall be subject to Type Two inspections in accordance with Section VII of Part Five of this Protocol. Such inspections shall fall within the annual inspection quota for Type Two inspections. During such inspections the following procedures shall apply:
(a) Upon the arrival of the inspection team at the storage facility, a member of the in-country escort shall provide to the inspection team leader, in writing, information on the number and types of all deployed heavy bombers located at the storage facility, as well as the condition of each such heavy bomber. In addition, an inspection site diagram of the storage facility for heavy bombers, annotated to depict the location of all such heavy bombers, shall be provided.
(b) Upon completion cf the pre-inspection procedures, the
nspection team leader shall designate for inspection no more than three deployed heavy bombers that are not environmentally-sealed and that are depicted on the inspection site diagram of the storage facility for heavy bombers.
(c) The inspection team shall have the right to inspect all deployed heavy bombers located at the storage facility at the time pre-inspection restrictions were implemented in order to confirm the data on the number and types of these heavy bombers.
(d) Environmentally-sealed heavy bombers may be inspected only by viewing the exterior of such heavy bombers in order to confirm the number and type of such heavy bombers, to read the unique identifiers on them, and to verify that the unique tamper-proof seals have not been damaged. In the event that the unique tamper-proof seals on a heavy bomber have been damaged, the inspected Party shall provide an explanation of the reason for such damage. In the event that the explanation is judged to be unsatisfactory, such a heavy bomber may be inspected by viewing the interior of the weapons bay, and the unique tamper-proof seals may be re-applied to the weapons bay.
(e) Upon the arrival of the inspection team at designated heavy bombers, the in-country escort shall prepare the heavy bombers for viewing. The inspection team shall have the right to maintain uninterrupted visual contact with each designated heavy bomber while the heavy bomber is being prepared for viewing.
(f) For deployed heavy bombers designated for inspection in accordance with subparagraph (b) of this paragraph, the inspection team shall have the right to inspect such heavy bombers by viewing the interior of the weapons bays of such heavy bombers from a location designated by the in-country escort, in order to confirm that such heavy bombers do not have nuclear armaments located on them.
(g) Deployed heavy bombers may be inspected only to the extent that the condition of such heavy bombers allows such procedures to be carried out.
5. If an environmentally-sealed deployed heavy bomber of a type subject to the Treaty and not exhibited during the exhibition conducted in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Agreed Statement is located at the storage facility at Davis- Monthan Air Force Base after such an exhibition, the United States of America shall conduct a similar exhibition of one environmentally-sealed deployed heavy bomber of that type. Such an exhibition shall be conducted in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Agreed Statement.

Fifth Agreed Statement

Rapid Reload of ICBM and SLBM Launchers

The Parties agree that the production, testing, or
deployment of systems designed for the rapid reload of ICBM launchers and SLBM launchers is unwarranted and should not be pursued by either Party.

Sixth Agreed Statement

Use of Telemetric Information

The Parties agree that the exchange of telemetric information within the framework of the Treaty is designed to help forge a new strategic relationship of the Parties, not for undermining the potential of the strategic offensive arms of the Parties.

Seventh Agreed Statement

Converted Silo Launchers of ICBMs at Vandenberg Air Force Base

The Parties agree that, with respect to the five converted silo launchers of ICBMs located at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, United States of America, that were converted prior to signature of the Treaty, the following provisions shall apply.
1. In order to provide assurances that all five converted silo launchers of ICBMs remain incapable of launching ICBMs, no later than three years after entry into force of the Treaty, the United States of America shall conduct a one-time exhibition of the five converted silo launchers of ICBMs. The purpose of such an exhibition shall be to demonstrate that these launchers are no longer capable of launching ICBMs as well as to determine the features that distinguish a converted silo launcher of ICBMs from a silo launcher of ICBMs that has not been converted. On the basis of the results of such an exhibition, the distinguishing features shall be recorded in the inspection activity report. Such an exhibition shall be conducted, as applicable, in accordance with the procedures for an exhibition specified in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol, as provided for in Section VIII of Part Five of this Protocol.
2. After the initial exhibition of all five converted silo launchers of ICBMs, the United States of America shall conduct one additional exhibition of the five converted silo launchers of ICBMs to demonstrate that the previously recorded distinguishing features remain unchanged, that the launchers have not been reconverted, and that the launchers remain incapable of launching ICBMs. Such an exhibition shall be conducted at an agreed time, but no later than 30 days after the receipt of a request thereof from the Russian Federation.

Eighth Agreed Statement

Non-nuclear Objects Located on the Front Section of an ICBM or SLBM

1. The Parties agree that, considering military utility, only nuclear-armed reentry vehicles and non-nuclear objects other than reentry vehicles may be simultaneously located on a front section of an ICBM or SLBM.
2. Such non-nuclear objects located on the front section of an ICBM or SLBM that has been declared to be equipped with no less than one nuclear-armed reentry vehicle shall not be counted against the aggregate limit provided for in subparagraph l(b) of Article I1 of the Treaty.
3. The Parties shall have the right to confirm that such non- nuclear objects are not nuclear-armed reentry vehicles, using procedures contained in the Annex on Inspection Activities to this Protocol.

Ninth Agreed Statement

Conversion of Individual Launchers of SLBMs

1. The Parties agree that launchers converted in accordance with Part Three of this Protocol that are incapable of launching SLBMs may simultaneously be located on a ballistic missile submarine.
2. Within the 30-day period after provision of notification of the completion of the conversion of the first launcher of SLBMs installed on a specific type of ballistic missile submarine, the Party that carried out such a conversion shall conduct a one-time exhibition of a converted launcher and an SLBM launcher that has not been converted.
(a) The purpose of such an exhibition shall be to demonstrate the distinguishing features of a converted launcher and an SLBM launcher that has not been converted.
(b) On the basis of the results of the exhibition, the distinguishing features shall be recorded in the inspection activity report and shall be used thereafter for conducting inspections.
3. Upon completion of the conversion procedures in accordance with paragraphs 6 and 7 of Section IV of Part Three of this Protocol, the specified converted launchers shall not be counted against the aggregate limit provided for in subparagraph l(c) of Article I1 of the Treaty.
4. Throughout the duration of the Treaty, in order to provide assurances that converted launchers installed on ballistic missile submarines have not been reconverted and remain incapable of launching SLBMs, upon completion of the period of inspection of each launcher provided for in paragraph 7 of Section IV of Part Three of this Protocol, converted launchers shall remain subject to inspection during Type One inspections at submarine bases.
5. The inspection of a converted launcher installed on a ballistic missile submarine shall be conducted in accordance with Section VI of Part Five of this Protocol, with the following changes:(a) Upon the arrival of the inspection team at the submarine base, a member of the in-country escort shall provide to the inspection team leader, in writing, in addition to the information provided for in subparagraph 5(b) of Section VI of Part Five of this Protocol, information on the number of converted launchers installed on ballistic missile submarines subject to pre-inspection restrictions, including the location of each converted launcher installed on each ballistic missile submarine.
(b) The inspection team leader shall have the right to designate for inspection one converted launcher installed on a ballistic missile submarine in addition to SLBM launchers, the inspection of which is provided for in subparagraph 6(b) of Section VI of Part Five of this Protocol.
(c) The designated converted launcher must be installed on the same ballistic missile submarine as the designated deployed launcher of SLBMs.
(dl A subgroup of no more than five inspectors shall have the right to inspect the designated converted launcher to confirm that the converted launcher remains incapable of launching an SLBM, using each of the recorded distinguishing features for such a launcher.
(el The results of such an inspection and confirmation of each of the distinguishing features shall be recorded in the inspection activity report.

Tenth Agreed Statement

Customs Duties and Taxes

The Parties agree that all equipment, recording media, and supporting documentation for such media, as well as tools required for installation, provided by a Party and imported into the territory of the other Party for the purposes of the Treaty, shall be exempt from any customs duties and related taxes and charges.

PART TEN -FINAL PROVISIONS

1. The Parties may agree to additional procedures for the implementation of this Protocol. Such procedures shall be contained in Annexes which shall be an integral part of this Protocol.
2. This Protocol shall enter into force on the date of entryinto force of the Treaty and shall remain in force so long as the Treaty remains in force. I Done at Prague, this eighth day of April, 2010, in two originals, each in the English and Russian languages, both I texts being equally authentic.

FOR THE FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: RUSSIAN FEDERATION:

Join Emptysuit On Twitter

Click On Links:
Transcript: Barack Obama And Dmitry Medvedev Nuclear Treaty
Barack Obama And Dmitry Medvedev Sign Nuclear Treaty

Video Of Cilivians Killed In Iraq (warning graphic video)
Iraqi Patrol Vehicle Hit By IED (warning graphic video)

History Of Iran And USA
Ahmadinejad Tells Obama, Get Some Experience
The House Negro And The Field Negro
About Emptysuit
Hillary Clinton Warned America About Obama

Iran Test Medium Range Missle
Obama Call For Spending Freezes
Summary Of The Defense Appropriation Bill
2011 Budget Summary
2011 Budget Terminations, Reductions And Savings
Iran Marks 31st Anniversary Of Islamic Revolution
Liberal’s Anti-War Hypocrisy.?
Bush Billboard, Miss Me Yet?

Share

Transcript: Barack Obama And Dmitry Medvedev Nuclear Treaty

OBAMA: Good afternoon, everyone. I am honored to be back here in the Czech Republic with President Medvedev and our Czech hosts to mark this historic completion of the new START treaty.

Let me begin by saying how happy I am to be back in the beautiful city of Prague. The Czech Republic, of course, is a close friend and ally of the United States, and I have great admiration and affection for the Czech people. Their bonds with the American people are deep and enduring, and Czechs have made great contributions to the United States over many decades _ including in my hometown of Chicago. I want to thank the president and all those involved in helping to host this extraordinary event.

I want to thank my friend and partner, Dmitry Medvedev. Without his personal efforts and strong leadership, we would not be here today. We’ve met and spoken by phone many times throughout the negotiations of this treaty, and as a consequence, we’ve developed a very effective working relationship built on candor, cooperation, and mutual respect.

One year ago this week, I came here to Prague and gave a speech outlining America’s comprehensive commitment to stopping the spread of nuclear weapons and seeking the ultimate goal of a world without them. I said then _ and I will repeat now _ that this is a long-term goal, one that may not even be achieved in my lifetime. But I believed then _ as I do now _ that the pursuit of that goal will move us further beyond the Cold War, strengthen the global nonproliferation regime and make the United States, and the world, safer and more secure. One of the steps that I called for last year was the realization of this treaty, so it’s very gratifying to be back in Prague today.

I also came to office committed to resetting relations between the United States and Russia, and I know that President Medvedev shared that commitment. As he said at our first meeting in London, our relationship had started to drift, making it difficult to cooperate on issues of common interest to our people. And when the United States and Russia are not able to work together on big issues, it’s not good for either of our nations, nor is it good for the world.

Together, we’ve stopped that drift, and proven the benefits of cooperation. Today is an important milestone for nuclear security and nonproliferation and for U.S.-Russia relations. It fulfills our common objective to negotiate a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty. It includes significant reductions in the nuclear weapons that we will deploy. It cuts our delivery vehicles by roughly half. It includes a comprehensive verification regime, which allows us to further build trust. It enables both sides the flexibility to protect our security, as well as America’s unwavering commitment to the security of our European allies. And I look forward to working with the United States Senate to achieve ratification for this important treaty later this year.

Finally, this day demonstrates the determination of the United States and Russia _ the two nations that hold over 90 percent of the world’s nuclear weapons _ to pursue responsible global leadership. Together, we are keeping our commitments under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, which must be the foundation for global nonproliferation.

While the New START treaty is an important first step forward, it is just one step on a longer journey. As I said last year in Prague, this treaty will set the stage for further cuts. And going forward, we hope to pursue discussions with Russia on reducing both our strategic and tactical weapons, including non-deployed weapons.

President Medvedev and I have also agreed to expand our discussions on missile defense. This will include regular exchanges of information about our threat assessments, as well as the completion of a joint assessment of emerging ballistic missiles. And as these assessments are completed, I look forward to launching a serious dialogue about Russian-American cooperation on missile defense.

But nuclear weapons are not simply an issue for the United States and Russia _ they threaten the common security of all nations. A nuclear weapon in the hands of a terrorist is a danger to people everywhere _ from Moscow to New York; from the cities of Europe to South Asia. So next week, 47 nations will come together in Washington to discuss concrete steps that can be taken to secure all vulnerable nuclear materials around the world in four years.

And the spread of nuclear weapons to more states is also an unacceptable risk to global security, raising the specter of arms races from the Middle East to East Asia. Earlier this week, the United States formally changed our policy to make it clear that those (non)-nuclear weapons states that are in compliance with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and their nonproliferation obligations will not be threatened by America’s nuclear arsenal. This demonstrates, once more, America’s commitment to the NPT as a cornerstone of our security strategy. Those nations that follow the rules will find greater security and opportunity. Those nations that refuse to meet their obligations will be isolated and denied the opportunity that comes with international recognition.

That includes accountability for those that break the rules _ otherwise the NPT is just words on a page. That’s why the United States and Russia are part of a coalition of nations insisting that the Islamic Republic of Iran face consequences, because they have continually failed to meet their obligations. We are working together at the United Nations Security Council to pass strong sanctions on Iran. And we will not tolerate actions that flout the NPT, risk an arms race in a vital region, and threaten the credibility of the international community and our collective security.

While these issues are a top priority, they are only one part of the U.S.-Russia relationship. Today, I again expressed my deepest condolences for the terrible loss of Russian life in recent terrorist attacks, and we will remain steadfast partners in combating violent extremism. We also discussed the potential to expand our cooperation on behalf of economic growth, trade and investment, as well as technological innovation, and I look forward to discussing these issues further when President Medvedev visits the United States later this year, because there is much we can do on behalf of our security and prosperity if we continue to work together.

When one surveys the many challenges that we face around the world, it’s easy to grow complacent or to abandon the notion that progress can be shared. But I want to repeat what I said last year in Prague: When nations and peoples allow themselves to be defined by their differences, the gulf between them widens. When we fail to pursue peace, then it stays forever beyond our grasp.

This majestic city of Prague is in many ways a monument to human progress. And this ceremony is a testament to the truth that old adversaries can forge new partnerships. I could not help but be struck the other day by the words of Arkady Brish, who helped build the Soviet Union’s first atom bomb. At the age of 92, having lived to see the horrors of a World War and the divisions of a Cold War, he said, “We hope humanity will reach the moment when there is no need for nuclear weapons, when there is peace and calm in the world.”

It’s easy to dismiss those voices. But doing so risks repeating the horrors of the past, while ignoring the history of human progress. The pursuit of peace and calm and cooperation among nations is the work of both leaders and peoples in the 21st century. For we must be as persistent and passionate in our pursuit of progress as any who would stand in our way.

Once again, President Medvedev, thank you for your extraordinary leadership.

MEDVEDEV (translated): A truly historic event took place: A new Russia-U.S. treaty has been signed for the further reduction and limitation of strategic offensive arms. This treaty has a 10-year duration. It will supersede the START treaty, which has expired, as well as another existing treaty, Russia-U.S. treaty on the reduction of strategic offensive capabilities.

And first of all, I’d like to thank my colleague, president of the United States of America, for the successful cooperation in this very complex matter, and for the reasonable compromises that have been achieved, thanks to the work of our two teams _ we have already thanked them, but let me do it once again in the presence of the media and the public. We thank them for their excellent work.

And I would also like to thank the leadership of the Czech Republic, Mr. President, for the invitation to hold this signing ceremony here in this beautiful city, in this beautiful springtime, thereby creating a good atmosphere for the future. And I believe that this signature will open a new page for cooperation between our two countries _ among our countries _ and will create safer conditions for life here and throughout the world.

One word _ we aimed at the quality of the treaty. And indeed, the negotiating process has not been simple, but again, our negotiation teams have been working in a highly professional, constructive way that has been lots of work, and very often, they worked 24 hours a day. And that enabled us to do something that just a couple of months looked like mission impossible; within a short span of time, we prepared a full-fledged treaty and signed it.

As a result, we obtained a document that in full measure maintains the balance of interest of Russia and the United States of America. What matters most is that this is a win-win situation. No one stands to lose from this agreement. I believe that this is a typical feature of our cooperation _ both parties have won. And taking into account this victory of ours, the entire world community has won.

This agreement enhances strategic stability and, at the same time, enables us to rise to a higher level for cooperation between Russia and the United States. And although the contents of the treaty are already known, let me point out once again what we have achieved, because this is very important thing: 1,550 developed weapons, which is about one-third below the current level; 700 deployed ICBMs _ intercontinental ballistic missile _ and anti-ballistic missiles and heavy bombers, and this represents more than twofold reduction below the current levels; and 800 deployed and non-deployed launchers for such missiles _ deployed and non-deployed heavy bombers, which again represents a twofold reduction below the level that existed prior to the signature on this treaty.

And at the same time, each party can use its own discretion to defend the makeup and structure of its strategic offensive potential.

The treaty also includes provisions concerning data exchange. We are quite experienced now in this matter with my colleague and we are great experts on this matter _ perhaps the greatest experts in the world. And the treaty also includes provisions concerning conversion and elimination, inspection provisions and verification provisions as well as confidence-building measures.

The verification mechanism has been significantly simplified and much less costly, as compared with the previous START treaty. At the same time, it ensures the proper verification, irreversibility and transparency of the entire process of reducing strategic offensive arms.

We believe _ and this is our hope and position _ we believe that the treaty can be viable and can operate only provided there is no qualitative or quantitative (inaudible) in place in the capabilities, something that could, in the final analysis, jeopardize the strategic offensive weapons on the Russian side. This is the gist of the statement made by the Russian Federation in connection with the signature on this treaty.

The main task of the full signature period we regard as achieving the ratification of the treaty, as mentioned by my colleague, Mr. President of the United States, and it is also important to synchronize the ratification process. Our American partners, as I understand, intend to proceed quickly to present this document to the Senate for ratification. We also will be working with our Federal Assembly to maintain the necessary dynamics of the ratification process.

By and large, we are satisfied with what we’ve done. The result we have obtained is good. But today, of course, we have discussed not only the fact of signing this treaty; we have also discussed a whole range of important key issues of concern to all the countries. Of course, we would not omit the Iranian nuclear problem. Regrettably, Iran is not responding to the many constructive proposals that have been made and we cannot turn a blind eye to this. Therefore I do not rule out the possibility of the Security Council of the United Nations will have to review this issue once again.

Our position is well known. Let me briefly outline it now. Of course, sanctions by themselves seldom obtain specific results, although it’s difficult to do without them in certain situations. But in any case, those sanctions should be smart and aimed not only at nonproliferation but also to resolve other issues _ rather than to produce (inaudible) for the Iranian people.

(Audio is lost.)

I am convinced that all that has been done so far is just the beginning of a long way, long way ahead. I wouldn’t like to see the Russian Federation and the United States be narrowed down to just limiting strategic offensive arms.

To be sure, we shoulder specific responsibility, a special responsibility, in that respect, and we …

(Audio is lost.)

And let me once again thank President Barack Obama for the cooperation in this area. Thank you.

(Audio is lost.)

OBAMA: We recognize, however, that Russia has a significant interest in this issue, and what we’ve committed to doing is to engaging in a significant discussion not only bilaterally but also having discussions with our European allies and others about a framework in which we can potentially cooperate on issues of missile defense in a way that preserves U.S. national security interests, preserves Russia’s national security interests, and allows us to guard against a rogue missile from any source.

So I’m actually optimistic that having completed this treaty, which signals our strong commitment to a reduction in overall nuclear weapons, and that I believe is going to strengthen the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty regime, that sends a signal around the world that the United States and Russia are prepared to once again take leadership in moving in the direction of reducing reliance on nuclear weapons and preventing the spread of nuclear weapons, as well as nuclear materials, that we will have built the kind of trust not only between presidents but also between governments and between peoples that allows us to move forward in a constructive way.

I’ve repeatedly said that we will not do anything that endangers or limits my ability as commander in chief to protect the American people. And we think that missile defense can be an important component of that. But we also want to make clear that the approach that we’ve taken in no way is intended to change the strategic balance between the United States and Russia. And I’m actually confident that, moving forward, as we have these discussions, it will be part of a broader set of discussions about, for example, how we can take tactical nuclear weapons out of theater, the possibilities of us making more significant cuts not only in deployed but also non-deployed missiles. There are a whole range of issues that I think that we can make significant progress on. I’m confident that this is an important first step in that direction.

MEDVEDEV (translated): … on that basis we will implement the newly signed treaty. It matters to us what will happen to missile defense. It is related to the configuration of our potential and our capacities, and we will watch how these processes develop. And the preamble has a language that, to a certain extent, replicates a legal principle of the unchangeability of circumstances that were basis for the treaty. But this is a flexible process, and we are interested in close cooperation over it with our American partners.

We have appreciated the steps by the current U.S. administration in terms of the decisions in the area of anti-missile defense of the present administration, and this has led to progress. It doesn’t mean that we’ll have no digressions in understanding, but it means that we’ll have will and wish to address these issues.

We offered to the United States that we help them establish a global anti-missile defense system, and we should think about this, given the vulnerability of our world, the terrorist challenges and the possibility of using nuclear arms by terrorists existing in this world.

And I am an optimist, as well as my American colleague, and I believe that we will be able to reach compromise on these issues.

Q (translated): I have two questions. To each of the presidents, one. The first is to Mr. Obama. Moscow and Washington, not for the first time, agree on a reduction of strategic offensive arms, but as you have mentioned, Russia and the United States are not the only countries having nuclear weapons. So how specifically can the documents achieved _ well, similar to today’s document on limitation on nuclear arms _ how soon we will see others sign this document? And will you move along this track together with Russia?

And to the president of the Russian Federation, you have mentioned the fact that sometimes there’s an impression that Moscow and Washington are unable to agree on anything else but a mutual reduction of arms. So will we see any things that will counter such a statement? And what will the agreement be?

OBAMA: First of all, as I mentioned in my opening remarks, the United States and Russia account for 90 percent of the world’s nuclear weapons. And given this legacy of the Cold War, it is critical for us to show significant leadership. That, I think, is what we’ve begun to do with this follow-on START treaty.

Other countries are going to have to be making a series of decisions about how they approach the issue of their nuclear weapons stockpiles. And as I’ve repeatedly said, and I’m sure Dmitry feels the same way with respect to his country, we are going to preserve our nuclear deterrent so long as other countries have nuclear weapons, and we are going to make sure that that stockpile is safe and secure and effective.

But I do believe that, as we look out into the 21st century, that more and more countries will come to recognize that the most important factors in providing security and peace to their citizens will depend on their economic growth, will depend on the capacity of the international community to resolve conflicts; it will depend on having a strong conventional military that can protect our nations’ borders; and that nuclear weapons increasingly in an interdependent world will make less and less sense as the cornerstone of security policy.

But that’s going to take some time, and I think each country is going to have to make its own determinations. The key is for the United States and Russia to show leadership on this front because we are so far ahead of every nation with respect to possession of nuclear weapons.

The primary concerns that we identified in a recent Nuclear Posture Review, essentially a declaratory statement of U.S. policy with respect to nuclear weapons, said that our biggest concerns right now are actually the issues of nuclear terrorism and nuclear proliferation _ more countries obtaining nuclear weapons; those weapons being less controllable, less secure; nuclear materials floating around the globe. And that’s going to be a major topic of the discussion that we have in Washington on Monday.

The United States and Russia have a history already, a decade-long history, of locking down loose nuclear materials. I believe that our ability to move forward already on sanctions with respect to North Korea, the intense discussions that we’re having with respect to Iran, will increasingly send a signal to countries that are not abiding by their Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty obligations, that they will be isolated. All those things will go toward sending a general message that we need to move in a new direction. And I think leadership on that front is important.

Last point I’ll make, I will just anticipate or coach the question about other areas of cooperation. Our respective foreign ministers _ Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Foreign Minister Lavrov _ have been heading a bilateral commission that has been working intensively on a whole range of issue. And President Medvedev and myself identified a series of key areas on the economic front, in trade relations, the potential for joint cooperation on various industries, how we can work on innovation and sparking economic growth. We’ve already worked together closely in the G20; I think we can build on that bilaterally.

There are issues of counterterrorism that are absolutely critical to both of us, and I just want to repeat how horrified all of America was at the recent attacks in Moscow. We recognize that that’s a problem that can happen anywhere at any time, and it’s important for Russia and the United States to work closely on those issues.

And then there are people-to-people contacts and figuring out how we can make sure that there’s more interaction and exchange between our two countries on a whole range of issues within civil society.

So I’m very optimistic that we’re going to continue to make progress on all of these fronts. But I think we should take pride in this particular accomplishment because it speaks not only to the security of our two nations but also the security of the world as a whole.

MEDVEDEV: It’s always good to answer second. First of all, you know what your partner has said, and secondly, you can comment on what has been said by your interlocutor. As a matter of fact, I will say a couple of words on the first part of the question that was meant for my colleague.

Yes, we have 90 percent of all the stockpiles which is the heritage of the Cold War legacy, and we’ll do all that we have agreed upon. Keep in mind, special mission of Russia and the U.S. on this issue, and we do care about what is going on with nuclear arms in other countries of the world, and we can’t imagine a situation when the Russian Federation and the United States take efforts to disarm and the world would move towards a principled different direction away _ in charge of our peoples and the situation in the world.

So all the issues related to the implementation of the treaty and nonproliferation and the threat of nuclear terrorism should be analyzed by us in a complex way, an integrated way. And I’d like this signing not to be regarded by other countries as their _ well, stepping aside from the issue. On the contrary, they should be involved to the full and take an active participation in it. They should be aware what is going on.

So we welcome the initiative that has been proposed by the president of the United States to convene a relevant conference in Washington, and I will take part in it, which is good platform to discuss nonproliferation issues.

In this world we have a lot that brings us together, we and the United States as well. And today we have had a very good talk that has started not with the discussion of the documents to be signed _ they were coordinated _ and not with discussing Iran, North Korea, Middle East, and other pressing issues of foreign affairs, but we started with economic issues.

I have said that there is a gap in our economic cooperation. I have looked at the figures, how the cumulative investments of the United States in Russia is quite small _ nearly $7 billion, and the figure has decreased a bit thanks to the world crisis. In terms of Russian investment into the U.S., well, it’s nearly the same, which testifies to areas of interests. It’s not with all countries that we have such volume of investment, but if we compare the figures with the figures of foreign investors’ presence in the American economy _ I mean other countries, including states that can be compared with Russia in terms of volume of economy, so it’s the difference of 20 or 30 times. So we have a field to work upon.

To say nothing about the projects we talked about today _ modernization, high-tech, economy, establishment, and in the Russian Federation, we are open for cooperation and would like to use American experience to employ _ these also include issues of energy, cooperation in transport, and I have suggested some time ago returning to the issue of creating a big cargo plane as such a unique experience _ only two countries have, the U.S. and Russia. The issues of nuclear cooperation are important.

So there can be a lot of economic projects. It’s not the business of presidents to deal with each of them, but some key issues are to be controlled by us, as the relations in business, relations between those who would like to develop active ties _ depend on business ties _ and humanitarian contacts, people-to-people contacts are important. And it’s significant that we do our best so that our citizens respect each other, understand each other better, so that they are guided by the best practices of American-Russian culture, and not perceive each other through the lens of information that sometimes is provided by mass media.

So we should more attentively, more thoughtfully _ well, have a more thoughtful attitude towards each other. And I count on this.

Q: Thank you, President Medvedev and President Obama. For President Obama first, could you elaborate on how the yearlong negotiations over the New START treaty have advanced U.S. cooperation with Russia on Iran, and give us a sense of when you will pursue, move forward in the United Nations and next week with sanctions discussions, and what those sanctions might look like?

And for President Medvedev, could you address whether Russia could accept sanctions against Iran specifically dealing with its energy industry and energy sector? Thank you.

OBAMA: Discussions about sanctions on Iran have been moving forward over the last several weeks. In fact, they’ve been moving forward over the last several months. We’re going to start seeing some ramped-up negotiations taking place in New York in the coming weeks. And my expectation is that we are going to be able to secure strong, tough sanctions on Iran this spring.

Now, I think there are two ways in which these START negotiations have advanced or at least influenced Russia-U.S. discussions around Iran. The first is obviously that President Medvedev and I have been able to build up a level of trust, and our teams have been able to work together, in such a way that we can be frank, we can be clear, and that helped to facilitate, then, our ability, for example, to work together jointly to present to Iran reasonable options that would allow it to clearly distance itself from nuclear weapons and pursue a path of peaceful nuclear energy.

That wasn’t just an approach that was taken by the United States and Russia, but it was an approach taken by the P5-plus-1 as well as the International Atomic Energy Agency, the IAEA.

So what we’ve seen from the start is that a host of countries, but _ led by countries like the United States and Russia, have said to Iran, we are willing to work through diplomatic channels to resolve this issue. And unfortunately, Iran has consistently rebuffed our approach. And I think that Russia has been a very strong partner in saying that it has no interest in bringing down Iranian society or the Iranian government, but it does have an interest, as we all do, in making sure that each country is following its international obligations.

The second way in which I think the START treaty has influenced our discussions about Iran is it’s sent a strong signal that the United States and Iran _ or the United States and Russia, are following our own obligations under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, and that our interest in Iran or North Korea or any other country following the NPT is not based on singling out any one country, but rather sends a strong signal that all of us have an obligation, each country has an obligation to follow the rules of the road internationally to ensure a more secure future for our children and our grandchildren.

And so I think the fact that we are signing this treaty, the fact that we are willing, as the two leading nuclear powers, to continually work on reducing our own arsenals, I think should indicate the fact that we are willing to be bound by our obligations, and we’re not asking any other countries to do anything different, but simply to follow the rules of the road that have been set forth and have helped to maintain at least a lack of the use of nuclear weapons over the last several decades, despite, obviously, the Cold War.

And the concern that I have in particular, a concern that I think is the most profound security threat to the United States, is that with further proliferation of nuclear weapons, with states obtaining nuclear weapons and potentially using them to blackmail other countries or potentially not securing them effectively or passing them on to terrorist organizations, that we could find ourselves in a world in which not only state actors but also potentially non-state actors are in possession of nuclear weapons, and even if they don’t use them, would then be in a position to terrorize the world community.

That’s why this issue is so important, and that’s why we are going to be pushing very hard to make sure that both smart and strong sanctions end up being in place soon to send a signal to Iran and other countries that this is an issue that the international community takes seriously.

MEDVEDEV: Let’s ask ourselves a question: What do we need sanctions for? Do we need them to enjoy the very fact of reprising _ imposing reprisals against another state, or is the objective another one? I am confident that all those present here will say that sanctions _ we need sanctions in order to prompt one or another individual or state to behave properly, behave within the framework of international law, while complying with the obligations assumed.

Therefore, when we are speaking about sanctions, I cannot disagree with what has yet been said. And this has been the position of the Russian Federation from the very outset. If we are to speak about sanctions, although they are not always successful, those sanctions should be smart sanctions that are capable of producing proper behavior on the part of relevant sides.

And what sort of sanctions should we need? Today we have had a very open-minded, frank, and straightforward manner discussed what can be done and what cannot be done. And let me put it straightforward: I have outlined our limits for such sanctions, our understanding of these sanctions, and I said that in making decisions like that, I, as friend of the Russian Federation, will proceed from two premises. First, we need to prompt Iran to behave properly; and secondly, least but not least, aim to maintain the national interests of our countries.

So smart sanctions should be able to motivate certain parties to behave properly, and I’m confident that our teams that will be engaged in consultations will continue discussing this issue.

Q (translated): Now, everyone is concerned whether the treaty will be ratified by the parliaments. You have mentioned that you will be working with the parliamentarians to achieve such certification. Let me ask you what difficulty you see along this road, and what do you _ how do you assess the chances for success? The question is addressed to both presidents.

MEDVEDEV: Well, by all appearances, Barack believes that we might have more problems with ratification. Perhaps that’s true, but let me say what I think about this question.

Of course, such agreements of major importance, international agreements, under our constitution and under our legislation, are subject to ratification by our parliaments. And of course, for our part, we intend to proceed promptly and to do all the necessary procedures to ensure that our parliament, our State Duma, starts reviewing this treaty, discussing this treaty.

I will proceed from the following: I believe that we have to ensure the synchronization of this ratification process so that neither party feels in one way or another compromised. Earlier we had periods when one state ratified while another party said, sorry, the situation has changed; therefore we cannot do it.

So this is something we’re to avoid. That’s why I say we have to proceed simultaneously in the conditions of an open-minded and straightforward discussion with subsequent certification by our parliaments. That’s what we need. And we will not be found amiss in that regard.

OBAMA: The United States Senate has the obligation of reviewing any treaty and, ultimately, ratifying it. Fortunately there is a strong history of bipartisanship when it comes to the evaluation of international treaties, particularly arms control treaties.

And so I have already engaged in consultation with the chairmen of the relevant committees in the United States Senate. We are going to broaden that consultation now that this treaty has been signed. My understanding is, is that both in Russia and the United States, it’s going to be posed on the Internet, appropriate to a 21st Century treaty. And so people not only within government but also the general public will be able to review, in an open and transparent fashion, what it is that we’ve agreed to.

I think what they will discover is that this is a well-crafted treaty that meets the interests of both countries; that meets the interests of the world in the United States and Russia reducing its nuclear arsenals and setting the stage for potentially further reductions in the future.

And so I’m actually quite confident that Democrats and Republicans in the United States Senate, having reviewed this, will see that the United States has preserved its core national security interests, that it is maintaining a safe and secure and effective nuclear deterrent, but that we are beginning to once again move forward, leaving the Cold War behind, to address new challenges in new ways. And I think the START treaty represents an important first step in that direction, and I feel confident that we are going to be able to get it ratified.

All right? Thank you very much, everybody.

MEDVEDEV: Thank you, sir. Next time.

Join Emptysuit On Twitter

Click On Links:
Barack Obama And Dmitry Medvedev Sign Nuclear Treaty

Video Of Cilivians Killed In Iraq (warning graphic video)
Iraqi Patrol Vehicle Hit By IED (warning graphic video)

History Of Iran And USA
Ahmadinejad Tells Obama, Get Some Experience
The House Negro And The Field Negro
About Emptysuit
Hillary Clinton Warned America About Obama

Iran Test Medium Range Missle
Obama Call For Spending Freezes
Summary Of The Defense Appropriation Bill
2011 Budget Summary
2011 Budget Terminations, Reductions And Savings
Iran Marks 31st Anniversary Of Islamic Revolution
Liberal’s Anti-War Hypocrisy.?
Bush Billboard, Miss Me Yet?

Share

Barack Obama And Dmitry Medvedev Sign Nuclear Treaty

The 160-page document obliges both sides to reduce their strategic offensive arms arsenal by one third.

Join Emptysuit On Twitter

Click On Links:
Video Of Cilivians Killed In Iraq (warning graphic video)
Iraqi Patrol Vehicle Hit By IED (warning graphic video)

History Of Iran And USA
Ahmadinejad Tells Obama, Get Some Experience
The House Negro And The Field Negro
About Emptysuit
Hillary Clinton Warned America About Obama

Iran Test Medium Range Missle
Obama Call For Spending Freezes
Summary Of The Defense Appropriation Bill
2011 Budget Summary
2011 Budget Terminations, Reductions And Savings
Iran Marks 31st Anniversary Of Islamic Revolution
Liberal’s Anti-War Hypocrisy.?
Bush Billboard, Miss Me Yet?

Share

Obama Nuclear Doctrine

Obama made public the strategic nuclear doctrine which reduces the manner nuclear weapons may be used. It is also the fight against proliferation and nuclear terrorism priority. Obama’s doctrine prohibits any use of the atom against non-nuclear-friendly non-proliferation treaty, even if biological or chemical attack. This is a change from the Bush era which, in his “review” of 2002, did not rule out nuclear attack against non-nuclear states. Obama “reduced the calculated ambiguity that maintaining the U.S.” on the conditions of employment of the ultimate weapon. The United States intends to move forward on a project including ICBMs equipped non-nuclear charges, launched under George W. Bush, while developing their missile defense. Obama plans to publish the new US nuclear doctrine next week, this will happen in the run-up to the signing of the Russian-US START Treaty which is to reduce  strategic offensive weapons. It will be signed on April, 8th in Prague. Obama’s has also considered a possible withdrawal of tactical nuclear weapons from Europe. These are 200 B61 gravity bombs located on bases in Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Turkey.

In the history of warfare, only two nuclear weapons have been detonated offensively, both near the end of World War II. The first was detonated on the morning of 6 August 1945, when the United States dropped “Little Boy” on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. The second was detonated three days later when the United States dropped “Fat Man” on the city of Nagasaki, Japan. Why are people talking about bombing countries with nuclear weapons as if they happen every year? A country has not been bombed since 1945, 65 years ago.

Click On Links
History Of Iran And USA
Guantánamo Bay Still Open
The House Negro And The Field Negro
About Emptysuit
Hillary Clinton Warned America About Obama

Iran Test Medium Range Missle
Obama Call For Spending Freezes
Summary Of The Defense Appropriation Bill
2011 Budget Summary
2011 Budget Terminations, Reductions And Savings
Iran Marks 31st Anniversary Of Islamic Revolution
Liberal’s Anti-War Hypocrisy.?
Bush Billboard, Miss Me Yet?

Share

Putin Rejects Clinton On Iran Sanctions

9054Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has criticised talk of sanctions against Iran. Mr. Putin said: “If we speak about some kind of sanctions now, before we take concrete steps, we will fail to create favourable conditions for negotiations. That is why we consider such talk premature.” The UN has imposed three previous sanctions on Iran for pursuing its uranium enrichment program. The first sanction, 2006, focused on banning trade in materials, equipment, goods and technology that could contribute to the nuclear program. They were expanded in 2007 to include arms exports from Iran.  In 2008 Iran was restricted from importing technologies that could be used for both civilian and military purposes. Russia has offered to help enrich uranium for Iran and have it returned in a form that could be used for medical research. Putin had better things to do, he was in Beijing for a meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao. Iran is an observer of the SCO. For the SCO, the importance of an Asian Energy Security Grid. In Beijing, Putin bluntly told the US not to intimidate Iran.

The White House had been hoping for a united, international push against Iran. But both Russia and China hold veto power on the United Nations Security Council, making the prospects for meaningful sanctions highly unlikely. Putin, a former KGB officer still control the levers of power in Russia. Putin has warned other world powers against threatening Iran during current negotiations over the Islamic country’s nuclear program. Putin stressed that what was needed was an “agreement”.  Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov defined sanctions as “counterproductive”. Last month Obama, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown called for sanctions and condemned Iran for constructing a secret uranium enrichment facility. Tehran has denied the facility is intended for weapons development and agreed to allow international inspectors to have access to the plant near Qum. Lavrov said that Russia wants to resolve all issues relating to Iran’s nuclear program, so that that country can make full use of its rights as a non-nuclear member of the Non-Proliferation Treaty. This means that they will not fall for the American December deadline threat on Iran. It was Putin who floated the idea of Iran enriching uranium in Russia in the first place. The United States and its allies Britain, France and Germany are contemplating tighter sanctions on Iran. Putin said what was needed was a compromise, and only if a compromise is not reached should other options be considered. Putin said, “There is no need to frighten the Iranians.” Since negotiations began, Iran has pledged to open its recently revealed uranium enrichment plant near Qom to UN inspectors.

Putin’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization meeting in Beijing with Jiabao about Russian Gas. This falls under what is known across Asia as the Asian Energy Security Grid. A key element of the grid is what the Russians have called the Eastern Gas Program. The plan includes the expansion of joint projects in Siberia and even in other countries across the Asia-Pacific. Unlike oil, 4 million barrels a day, China still does not import a lot of natural gas. It will because China needs it, and Putin knows that. Those pipelines would be capable of supplying China with 68 billion cubic metres of natural gas annually, representing 85 per cent of the gas China currently consumes. That’s why it was more important to for Putin to be in Beijing, than to listen to Hillary yack about Obama’s plans. Washington has a poor standing in the world. Blame George Bush if you want, but this stems from years of A Russia/US Cold War. Obama promised to end the era of “antagonism” between the United States and Russia. Obama’s “apology tour” was an open for Russia. Obama has stated that Putin was stuck “with one foot in the past.” Now, Obama sends Clinton to Russia to talk about sanctions against Tehran. Russia and China declined Obama, delivering another blow to the Obama Administration.

Click On Links:
US Talks With Iran In Vienna
Cloud Over Moscow
Dollar Losing Value Under Obama
North Korea Threatens US
Iran Second Uranium Plant
The Afghanistan War
Military Deaths In Afghanistan
Impeach Obama

U.S. Talks With Iran In Vienna

The Obama administration has been intensifying pressure on Tehran leading up to international talks next Monday on Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium. Clinton again warned that the US expected action by Iran following its meeting with the so-called P5+1 (the US, Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany) on October 1. The Obama administration’s involvement in talks with Iran has been accompanied by threats U.S. Defence Secretary Robert Gates described as “severe additional sanctions against Iran”.

Monday the British government ordered financial services to end all transactions with Iran’s Bank Mellat and the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines for their involvement with Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs. Clinton’s trip was to combine Russian support for tougher sanctions on Iran. Last month Obama modified of the planned US anti-missile systems, closing bases in the Czech Republic and Poland that had been opposed by Russia. Iran agreed to send most of its existing stock of low-enriched uranium to Russia for further enrichment and then to France for fabrication into fuel rods for a research reactor in Tehran that produces medical isotopes. This would end claims that Iran has  enough enriched uranium to build a bomb.

The meeting in Vienna is designed to thrash out details of the plan. The US has already made clear that it will adopt an aggressive stance. The Obama Administration states, “If they reject it, it is another data point that says, ‘Look, these guys are not serious’.” Iran’s Atomic Energy Agency, has warned that if talks failed, “Iran will enrich uranium to the 20 percent level needed for the Tehran reactor itself.”

Iran has agreed to open its enrichment plant near the city of Qom to International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors. This is the plant Obama seized on the Qom facility at the G-20 summit on September 25. The first IAEA inspection of the Qom plant is scheduled for October 25. A further high level meeting between the P5+1 and Iran is to take place before the end of October. President Obama has declared that December is the deadline for the conclusion of any negotiations with Iran. The US maintains close relationship with the Israeli government, which has repeatedly warned of military strikes against Iran’s nuclear plants. The US and Israeli militaries are currently engaged in joint military exercises code-named “Juniper Cobra” (specifically to test missile defence systems in the event of war.) More than 1,000 American troops and some 15 US missile warships are involved.

Click On Links:
Obama Ignore Soldiers Dying In Afghanistan
Taliban Attack
Secret Service Weapons
North Korea Threatens US
Osama Bin Laden Calls Obama ‘Powerless’
The Afghanistan War
Military Deaths In Afghanistan
Six Bomb Blasts In Baghdad Kills 95, Wound 536
Obama’s Keeps Silent About The Afghanistan War
Osama Bin Laden attacks Obama
Obama And Baghdad Suicide Bombers
Obama Repeatedly Said He Would Reinforce US Troops

Barack Hussein Obama Wins The Nobel Peace Prize

r877150564Barack Obama won the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize on Friday for “his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. THIS IS A BUNCH OF BULL!! Even the Nobel watchers believed it was too early to award the president. The choice shocked Nobel observers because Obama took office less than two weeks before the Feb. 1 nomination deadline. The Nobel committee praised Obama’s creation of “a new climate in international politics” and said he had returned multilateral diplomacy and institutions like the U.N. to the center of the world stage. Thorbjoern Jagland, chairman of the Nobel Committee said. “In the past year Obama has been a key person for important initiatives in the U.N. for nuclear disarmament and to set a completely new agenda for the Muslim world and East-West relations.” Does Iran Secret Nuclear Facility ring any bell. Obama is totally lost on ANY Nuclear talks.

Obama Surrenders to North Korea; Abandon’s Six Party Talks | Say …

Geneva nuclear arms talks fail to overcome block – International …

North Korea’s Missile Launch—Is Obama Repeating Bush’s …

India and Pakistan Fail to Restart Negotiations – NYTimes.com

North Korea tests nuclear weapon ‘as powerful as Hiroshima bomb …

Obama’s failed Iran initiative

Sarkozy Snubs Obama on Nuclear Threat Stance – Blogrunner

U.S.-Indian Talks Fail to Move Nuclear Deal | Arms Control Association

Obama calls Iran nuke talks ‘constructive’ but urges ‘action’

North Korea to Boycott Nuclear Talks After Un Condemns Rocket Launch

U.S. not ready to judge Iran nuclear talks – Nation & World – The …

Failed Nuclear Disarmament Deals Netted North Korea

UH, DID I MISS SOMETHING?
Does Obama deserve the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize?

Related Links:
2009 Nobel Peace Prize
Nobel Peace Prize A Joke
SNL Mocks Obama’s Lack Of Accomplishments
Obama Job Loss

Iran Second Uranium Plant

IranSecretPlantObama is trying to act tough by demanding that Tehran fulfill its obligations under international law or risk the imposition of harsh new sanctions, because he didn’t know about  Iran’s construction of a uranium enrichment facility.  Oops, let me take you back to May 21, 2009 my post –>Iran Tests Medium Range Missile “Why is Obama’s administration calling Iran’s launch of a surface-to-surface missile with a range of 1,200 miles a ‘success’, because it is capable of striking Israel and other American allies, as well as U.S. bases throughout the Middle East. This means Obama talks with Tehran failed.”  I mentioned The Sajjil-2 missile was launched from Semnan and it landed precisely on the target, 125 miles east of the capital Tehran. The Sajjil missile is equipped with a new navigation system as well as precise and sophisticated sensors, meaning it can hit targets in Israel and U.S. bases throughout the Middle East, is this the ’success’ you want Obama?

Iran acknowledged the existence of the facility for the first time September 21, 2009, in a letter to the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency. The letter said “a new pilot fuel enrichment plant is under construction in the country.” The letter stated that the enrichment level would be up to 5 percent. Skip to today, September 25, 2009, “Iran is breaking rules that all nations must follow,” Obama said. Iran has a second uranium enrichment facility intended to produce highly enriched uranium and will be capable within months of producing enough material for one nuclear bomb a year. The new uranium enrichment plant “violates decisions of the United Nations Security Council.

Obama and his two buddies, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown called the Iranian nuclear program “the most urgent proliferation challenge that the world faces today” and accused Iran of “serial deception” over many years. Where have these three stooges been? It doesn’t take a genius to figure what was going on here. They are “LEADERS” and are clueless of military operations. U.S. intelligence officials said that they have known about the site for several years. They described the plant as located in series of tunnels deep within a mountain on a base belonging to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps. If this is true then, Obama has no solid relation with the military. If he did he would have known this.

Iran’s nuclear program began in 2002 with the discovery of two large nuclear facilities in Natanz and Arak. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad insisted that Iran is using nuclear technology only for energy and medical purposes and has no interest in acquiring nuclear weapons. He said he wants to buy enriched uranium from the United States that would be used for medical purposes. Maybe Obama needs to stop RUNNING TO HIS MEDIA NETWORK FOR ATTENTION AND START RUNNING THE COUNTRY AS LEADER. This makes Obama look like a FOOL! Back to my post May 21, 2009, Obama was praising Iran success of missile test.

Obama, N. Korea Nuclear Program

fiantNorth Korea, calling itself a “proud nuclear power,” vowed to go ahead with its nuclear program in defiance of the latest United Nations sanctions resolution. Last Month Obama was warned this would happen, remember April 15th when North Korea ordered U.N. inspectors to leave after saying it would quit international nuclear disarmament talks and restart a plant that makes bomb-grade plutonium.  Obama was too busy playing with his puppy ‘Bo’ and his media decided to air Obama and the dog instead of taking N. Korea serious.

May 25 the government had a successful nuclear test, Now N. Korea said it intended to weaponize its remaining stockpile of plutonium and to pursue uranium enrichment. N. Korea Foreign Ministry has acknowledged that the country has a uranium enrichment program and blamed Washington for the nuclear tensions, saying it was “compelled to go nuclear. N. Korea also threatened military action if the United States and its allies were to try to isolate it.

Il160Obama are you listening, or will you take the dog for a walk again? No, this is what a US State Department official said: ‘(North Korea) needs to cease provocative actions and rhetoric, and return unconditionally to the six-party process.’ The six-party nuclear disarmament talks involve the two Koreas, the US, Russia, Japan and China. Mr/Mrs Offical, do you think Kim Jong-il want’s to here that.

Take A look at North Korea’s Nuclear Program

REACTORS: North Korea’s only functioning reactor was a 5-megawatt facility. The reactor was shut down in July 2007 as part of a disarmament-for-aid deal negotiated with five other nations. The facility was capable of producing plutonium, a radioactive material used to make nuclear bombs.
Construction of a 50-megawatt reactor at Yongbyon and an even larger reactor in nearby Taechon has been stalled for years.

DISARMAMENT: North Korea had been taking steps to disable Yongbyon under the watch of international experts in exchange for 1 million tons of fuel oil and other concessions. Disablement stopped weeks later amid a dispute with Washington over how to verify the regime’s past atomic activities. In April, North Korea quit the disarmament talks in response to U.N. Security Council condemnation of its April 5 rocket launch, and then expelled international nuclear monitors from Yongbyon.

RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS: North Korea is believed to have produced up to 110 pounds (50 kilograms) of weaponized plutonium — enough for half a dozen or more bomb. Reprocessing 8,000 spent nuclear fuel rods could yield enough weaponized plutonium for yet another bomb.

WEAPONS: North Korea conducted an underground test of a nuclear device in October 2006, confirming its ability to make atomic bombs. A second test was carried out on May 25.

North Korea orders U.N. inspectors out, Obama plays with “Bo”

43328North Korea ordered U.N. inspectors to leave on Tuesday after saying it would quit international nuclear disarmament talks and restart a plant that makes bomb-grade plutonium. North Korea said it saw talks on ending its nuclear weapons program as “useless”. Meanwhile back in D.C., Obama plays with his puppy, ‘Bo’.

North Korea began taking apart its Soviet-era Yongbyon nuclear plant more than a year ago as a part of a disarmament for an aid deal it reached with China, Japan, Russia, South Korea and the United States. April 5 North Korea launched a missile, now restarting a plant to make bomb-grade plutonium.

8200North Korea could have its plant that separates plutonium from spent fuel rods up running again in as little as three months. North Korea has enough plutonium for six to eight atomic bombs. In a statement the U.N. action and separate six-country nuclear talks were an infringement of its sovereignty and it “will never participate in the talks any longer nor … be bound to any agreement.” The  International Atomic Energy Agency, said North Korea had ordered U.N. inspectors to leave the country.  Who’s in charge here, Obama? No he’s playing with “Bo”, oh it’s Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, I’m waiting for her laughing video of this.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.