Archive for March, 2010

37 Killed In Moscow Subway Explosion

Two female suicide bombers blew themselves up on Moscow’s subway system as it was jam-packed with rush-hour passengers killing at least 37 people. The first blast just before 8 a.m. (12.00 a.m. ET) tore through the second carriage of a train as it stood at the Lubyanka metro station. The explosion killed at least 23 people. Another blast about 40 minutes later wrecked the second carriage of a train waiting at the Park Kultury metro station, killing 14 more people.

Join Emptysuit On Twitter

Click On Links:
Obama ‘Buckwheat’
Greeks Fighting At Stadium (Obama’s Dream Of America)
Complete Tape Of Rep. Emmanuel Cleaver Spitting Incident
Swastika Next To Obama On Golf Course
Black People Don’t Like Black Conservatives
Child Dies In House Fire, Aunt Concerned About Her Food Stamps
The House Negro And The Field Negro

Black People Don’t Like Black Conservatives
Health Clinic Fight
Obama’s School Speech, Wasn’t Understood
Michelle Obama Monkey Faces

Obama Kool Aid Drinkers
Obama The Devil
About Emptysuit
Your Opinion


Share

Sarah Palin And John McCain Reunite

Follow Me On Twitter

Click On Links:
Sarah Palin’s Tea Party Speech (video)
Sarah What Did You Do To Your Hair?
Sarah Palin On Fox News
About Emptysuit
Your Opinion
Rush Limbaugh Transcript: Rahm Emanuel “Retards”
Obama Shoe Shine Boy
Obama ‘Buckwheat’
Michelle Obama Chimp Image On Google
Michelle Obama Monkey Faces
Black People Don’t Like Black Conservatives
Obama Attempted To Block Fox News From Interviews
Impeach Obama
Bush Billboard, Miss Me Yet?
The House Negro And The Field Negro

Share

Greeks Fighting At Stadium (Obama’s Dream Of America)

Join Emptysuit On Twitter

Click On Links:
Children Singing To Hitler vs Obama
Children Praising Barack Hussein Obama
Swastika Next To Obama On Golf Course
Glenn Beck calls Obama a racist
Black People Don’t Like Black Conservatives
Complete Tape Of Rep. Emmanuel Cleaver
Spitting Incident

Michelle Obama’s Chimp Faces

The Race Card

White America Hate Barack Obama
You Cannot Call Obama A ‘Liar’

Glenn Beck calls Obama a racist
Barack Obama White Trash
Why Liberals Hate Free Speech
Michelle Obama called “Ghetto Girl”
Michelle Obama Chimp Image On Google
Child Dies In House Fire, Aunt Concerned About Her Food Stamps
The House Negro And The Field Negro

Farrakhan Said Don’t Be Pacified By Obama’s Election
Obama Kool Aid Drinkers
Obama The Devil
About Emptysuit
Your Opinion

Share

Obama ‘Buckwheat’

In the midst of delivering an impassioned speech decrying President Obama’s health care reform, GOP congressional hopeful Corey Poitier blurted out, “Listen up, Buckwheat — this is not how it is done!” The comparison of Obama to the 1920s Our Gang and The Little Rascals character `Buckwheat’. Poitier, who is black said, “The press has run amok with this, and turned me into a racist. I’ve never seen Buckwheat as a disparaging character. People love Buckwheat.”

Poitier says he and his brother have in fact called each other “Buckwheat” as a way to gently chide the other for being foolish — essentially a substitute for the word “dummy.” Poitier says he was trying to call the healthcare bill, not Obama, “dumb and silly.” “You’re an Uncle Tom, you’re an nigger,” Poitier said some of the e-mails say.

This leads me to another word use by many blacks, “nigger rigged” I wrote this last week during the health care voting process. I did put it up for a few minutes but decided to take it down. Black and many people have used this term, “nigger rigged” many times and in many instances. My wife used “nigger rigged” last week when some electricians were working on the house, and for those who have not realized, I am black. Growing up in a family of housing contractors “nigger rig” was used and heard all the time by both blacks and whites. Most of the time it referred to a cheaply done job. Some can take it as a racial slur, and many do.

There are many blog sites that use the term “Nigger, Negro and Niggas” in their titles. We seem to try avoiding saying those words and replace it with, “the N-Word.” Everybody know what you’re saying so why not say it, “NIGGER.” I hear people saying nigger all the time, then when a white person utter nigger black people lose their mind. What about “Lynching?” Remember this video: It must be ok for Jessie Jackson to perform the act. Did anyone call Jessie Jackson a racist for that?

The post: Nigger Rigged Health Care

Definition: Nigger Rigged from urbandictionary.com

1. nigger rigged: doing things improperly but still getting the same ending results

2. nigger rigged: fixing a mechanical problem with whatever’s avaiaible.

3. nigger Rigged: Anything tied, wired, glued, or taped together. Also called janky.

4. nigger rigged: a word that came about whenever an african american was lazy and decided hey, instead of constructing a way to actually fix somthing, id just rather poorly rig it together with whatever materials i can scrape up. Word. The repairs only last a very short time, until the item inevitably breaks again, and the process is repeated. Nigger rigs comprise of anything tied, wired, glued, or taped together, frequently involve coat hangers and duct tape, and are commonly used on items such as mufflers or TV antennas.

5. nigger rigged: a word that was accumulated whenever an african american was decided lazy and decided instead of constructing a way of to fix somthing then they would rather poorly rig it together

6. nigger rigged: An object that appears as if it has been setup or rigged by an African American. Also known for the racial slur of nigger.

7. nigger rigged: (v) To construct something poorly, to do something hal-assed, to jerry-rig something but do it sloppily. This word comes from the construction industry.

8. nigger rigged: when an object is broken, and you fix it by means that only temporarily will fix the problem, because you used inadequate means to fix it.

9. Nigger Rigged: A unique ability that stoners aquire over time. The ability to make a pipe, bong, ect. out of practically nothing.

Nigger Rig from urbandictionary.com

1. nigger rig: To fix something in a very cheap way, using whatever materials are handy.

2. nigger rig: To temporarily fix a mechanized object (usually an old car) using either a coat hanger or duct tape.

3. nigger rig: A term used to describe a temporary fix or quick fix for an object using any tools at hand. Derived from the ingenuity of early African-Americans who did not have the means to fix every day objects and had to come up with these temporary fixes.

4. nigger rig: To repair something in a lazy and wrong manner. So the item will work for a short time but the repair won’t last very long.

5. nigger rig: to affix some abnormal object an ordinary every day object to obtain the original usefulness that it was designed for while using materials that present themselves in a ghetto environment nigger riggging is attaching a coat hanger to an attena on a boom box to achieve the maximum reception while listining to fity cent, otherwise known as dumb nigger.

6. nigger rig: to fix something cheaply, and temporarily using minimal materials at no cost, either recycled or (most likely) stolen.

7. nigger rig: when you are on your way to make that sale and some shit breaks on your ride, you get a black crackhead to fix it.

8. nigger rig: to raise the flame on an adjustable lighter to excessive heights. done by removing the metal piece at the top, then repeatedly increasing the flame size by sliding the nob, then lifting it off the gear to move it back to the beginning.

The House of Representatives passed the health care reform bill Sunday night with a 219-to-212 vote. With the Senate already having passed the bill on Christmas Eve, it now stands ready for President Obama to sign into law, perhaps as early as Tuesday. Attorneys general in 12 states have said they will challenge the constitutionality of the health care bill. Moreover, Democrats still want to make changes to the final bill after the fact. The outlines of the bill are now clear. Here is the Monitor’s comprehensive look at what is in the health care bill and how it might affect you. What’s in the healthcare bill? An individual mandate. The legislation now in Congress would require most people in the US to buy health insurance. That’s the main way it would expand coverage by upward of 32 million people.

America was told about that in the first installment of the describe bill provisions. Beginning in 2014 people who are unemployed, self-employed, or work for businesses that don’t offer insurance would be able to shop for coverage in new “health exchanges,” Congressional budget experts figure that about 25 million people will shop for coverage in these exchanges. The cutoff level would be an income of four times the federal poverty level. For one person, that’s about $44,000 a year. For a family of four, the comparable figure is about $88,000. People who make less would have to pay a smaller slice of their income for coverage. For instance, individuals who make about $14,000, and four-person families with incomes of about $29,000, would not have to pay more than 3 to 4 percent of their incomes for insurance. Those who make even less – under 133 percent of the federal poverty level – would be able to enroll in a newly expanded Medicaid program..The federal subsidy would go straight to the insurer. It would look like a discount on the policy to the customer. If you make less money than the poverty cutoff level, you would still be eligible for aid. The federal government will in essence guarantee that you do not have to pay more than 9.8 percent of your income for your share of health insurance costs. The main way the feds would ensure this is to steer you, too, into this new exchange. Your employer would give you a voucher equal to the amount of money it contributes to your policy. Then you’d dive in there and shop for plans with all the self-employed people. The Congressional Budget Office numbers indicate it does not expect that many people will do this.

Another definition: Nigger Rig from urbandictionary.com

1. nigger rig: To fix something in a very cheap way, using whatever materials are handy.

2. nigger rig: To temporarily fix a mechanized object (usually an old car) using either a coat hanger or duct tape.

3. nigger rig: A term used to describe a temporary fix or quick fix for an object using any tools at hand. Derived from the ingenuity of early African-Americans who did not have the means to fix every day objects and had to come up with these temporary fixes.

4. nigger rig: To repair something in a lazy and wrong manner. So the item will work for a short time but the repair won’t last very long.

5. nigger rig: to affix some abnormal object an ordinary every day object to obtain the original usefulness that it was designed for while using materials that present themselves in a ghetto environment nigger riggging is attaching a coat hanger to an attena on a boom box to achieve the maximum reception while listining to fity cent, otherwise known as dumb nigger.

6. nigger rig: to fix something cheaply, and temporarily using minimal materials at no cost, either recycled or (most likely) stolen.

7. nigger rig: when you are on your way to make that sale and some shit breaks on your ride, you get a black crackhead to fix it.

8. nigger rig: to raise the flame on an adjustable lighter to excessive heights. done by removing the metal piece at the top, then repeatedly increasing the flame size by sliding the nob, then lifting it off the gear to move it back to the beginning.

If you are an individual making more than $200,000 a year, or a married couple making more than $250,000 a year, get ready to pay more for your Medicare if health care reform passes. Your Medicare Part A (that’s hospital insurance) tax rate would be increased by 0.9 percent, to 2.35 percent. The bill creates an entirely new tax of 3.8 percent on unearned income (dividends, interest, stuff like that) for people in those same income brackets. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates this would bring in $210 billion between 2013 and 2019. The bill would impose an excise tax on insurers of employer-sponsored health plans that cost more than $10,200 annually for individual coverage, or $27,500 annually for family coverage. The tax in question would be 40 percent of the cost of the plan that exceeds those dollar thresholds. This tax would not kick in until 2018. The JCT figures it would bring in around $32 billion in its first two years. The Obama administration figures it is only fair to slap some fees on health care industries, since they’d be getting lots of new customers if health care reform passes. So after negotiations with some big sectors, the White House struck a number of deals.

  • Drug manufacturers would pay the US a total of $16 billion between 2011 and 2019.
  • Health insurers would pay $47 billion over the same period.
  • Medical device manufacturers would pay a 2.9 percent excise tax on the sale of any of their wares, beginning Jan. 1, 2013.

Government payments to Medicare Advantage – plans run by private insurers that are an alternative to traditional Medicare – would be reduced by $132 billion over 10 years under the health care reform bill. (Those plans now get around 14 percent more per person than traditional Medicare does.) Medicare payments for home health care would also be reduced by $40 billion over 10 years. And cuts in certain payments to hospitals would raise another $22 billion by 2019.

Another definition: Nigger Rig It from urbandictionary.com

1. nigger rig it: To put something together in a very poor manner

2. nigger rig it: to temporarily “fix” something using whatever materials are at hand. Perfectly acceptable in an emergency, but not as a general rule.

Nigger Rigger

1. nigger rigger: A Black truck Driver.

2. nigger rigger:

1 Someone who can’t fix anything right. Often uses duct tape or coat hangers 2 A disreputable mechanic

The short answer is that healthcare reform will affect families differently, depending on their different circumstances. For those struggling to pay bills, who’ve avoided buying insurance because it costs too much, reform might mean they’ll have coverage, at least in a few years. For those at the top end of the income scale, it will mean higher taxes, fairly soon. For the vast majority of middle-income families, details of employment, dependents, and place of residence might change how the healthcare bill will alter their lives.

Kids with health problems. Healthcare reform legislation prohibits insurers from excluding from coverage children with pre-existing health conditions. This provision takes effect immediately upon the bill becoming law.

The bill would also prohibit insurers from excluding adults with pre-existing conditions, but not until 2014.

Older children and parental insurance. Dependent children up to age 26 will be able to stay on their parents’ family policy, after President Obama signs the bill. (There’s no special regulation as to what this will cost, however.) Currently, states regulate the age at which children are kicked off their parents’ insurance policies. Generally, it’s around 18 years old.

Children’s health insurance program. Kids’ eligibility for the popular CHIP (Children’s Health Insurance Program), which helps lower-income families, must be maintained, under the bill. States, even if hard-pressed by budget shortfalls, will not be able to cut children from the program until 2019.

Wellness program. Under bill language, “qualified health plans” will have to provide – with no cost-sharing – immunizations and other preventive health services for infants, children, and adolescents. This provision takes effect six months after the bill becomes law.

But for top executives at firms with 50 workers or more, the most important question may be this: would the health care reform bill require us to offer health insurance to our employees? If you are a firm with more than 50 employees, and do not offer health insurance as a benefit, and at least one of your full-time employees gets a subsidy from the federal government to purchase health insurance on his or her own, you would have to pay Washington a fee of $2,000 for every one of your full-time workers. (Company accountants take note: you could subtract the first 30 of your employees from that assessment.) If you do offer coverage, you might have to take some extra action to help any of your low- or middle-income workers who want to buy insurance on their own. An employee who makes less than 400 percent of the federal poverty level, which today is about $10,800 for an individual, or $22,000 for a family of four. If their share of health premiums is more than 8 percent of their income (but less than 9.8 percent), they would have the option of going out and buying insurance on their own through the new-fangled “exchange” marketplaces the health care reform bill would establish. The employer, would have to help them. You’d have to provide them a “free choice voucher” equal to what the firm would have kicked in to provide coverage in the company plan. All of the above changes would take effect beginning on Jan. 1, 2014. If you’re a firm with more than 200 employees, and you do offer health insurance, you would have to automatically enroll your workers in the plan.

States are already lining up to sue the federal government over the constitutionality of Obama’s health care overhaul. Officials in at least 10 states have agreed to file a lawsuit challenging the legislation.

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott said he planned to file the complaint “the moment Obama signs the bill.” Other states planning to challenge the bill were Alabama, Florida, South Carolina, Nebraska, North and South Dakota, Pennsylvania, Utah and Washington.

Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning said the measure “tramples on individual liberty and dumps on the states the burden of an unfunded mandate that taxpayers cannot afford.”

Join Emptysuit On Twitter

Click On Links:
Children Singing To Hitler vs Obama
Children Praising Barack Hussein Obama
Swastika Next To Obama On Golf Course
Glenn Beck calls Obama a racist
Black People Don’t Like Black Conservatives
Complete Tape Of Rep. Emmanuel Cleaver
Spitting Incident

Michelle Obama Monkey Faces

The Race Card

White America Hate Barack Obama
You Cannot Call Obama A ‘Liar’

Glenn Beck calls Obama a racist
Barack Obama White Trash
Why Liberals Hate Free Speech
Michelle Obama called “Ghetto Girl”
Michelle Obama Chimp Image On Google
Child Dies In House Fire, Aunt Concerned About Her Food Stamps
The House Negro And The Field Negro

Farrakhan Said Don’t Be Pacified By Obama’s Election
Obama Kool Aid Drinkers
Obama The Devil
About Emptysuit
Your Opinion

Share

More Apartments For Jews

Join Emptysuit On Twitter

Click On Links:
Children Singing To Hitler vs Obama
Children Praising Barack Hussein Obama
Swastika Next To Obama On Golf Course
Glenn Beck calls Obama a racist
Black People Don’t Like Black Conservatives
Complete Tape Of Rep. Emmanuel Cleaver
Spitting Incident

Michelle Obama’s Chimp Faces

Hillary Clinton Warned America About Obama
Liberals Hate Fox News
If I help him, he’s going to help me
Michelle Obama Chimp Image On Google
Child Dies In House Fire, Aunt Concerned About Her Food Stamps
The House Negro And The Field Negro

Farrakhan Said Don’t Be Pacified By Obama’s Election
Obama Kool Aid Drinkers
Obama The Devil
About Emptysuit
Your Opinion
The Race Card
Obama Kool Aid Drinkers

Share

Reconciliation Bill Summary

The 153-page bill makes a number of changes to the Senate bill. Read the text here.

The highlights:

–Increases the tax credits for middle-income families who buy insurance.

–Reduces the penalty for not buying insurance from $750 to $695. But the bill also requires some people to pay a share of their income as a penalty and that number was raised from 2 percent to 2.5 percent.

–It closes the gap in Medicare prescription drug coverage by 2011 and gives seniors who fall into the gap this year a $250 rebate.

–It eliminates the Cornhusker Kickback and covers 100 percent of the increased Medicaid costs of all states until 2016 and decreases each year thereafter.

–Requires that doctors that care for Medicaid patients be reimbursed at the full rate.

–Spends $250 million to fight waste, fraud and abuse.

–Delays and blunts the tax on high-end insurance plans in keeping with the deal Democrats struck with the labor unions. However, it does lower the index at which plans will be taxed, making it likely that more plans will be affected over time.

–Imposes a Medicare tax on unearned income for families making more than $250,000.

–Includes student loan reform.

Full summary after the jump.

Sec. 1001. Affordability. Improves the financing for premiums and cost sharing for individuals with incomes up to 400% of the federal poverty level. Subsection (a) improves tax credits to make premiums more affordable as a percent of income; and subsection (b) improves support for cost sharing, focusing on those with incomes below 250% of the federal poverty level. Starting in 2019, constrains the growth in tax credits if premiums are growing faster than the consumer price index, unless spending is more than 10% below current CBO projections.

Sec. 1002. Individual responsibility. Modifies the assessment that individuals who choose to remain uninsured pay in three ways: (a) exempts the income below the filing threshold, (b) lowers the flat payment from $495 to $325 in 2015 and from $750 to $695 in 2016 and (c) raises the percent of income that is an alternative payment amount from 0.5 to 1.0% in 2014, 1.0 to 2.0% in 2015, and 2.0 to 2.5% for 2016 and subsequent years to make the assessment more progressive.

Sec. 1003. Employer responsibility. Improves the transition to the employer responsibility policy for employers with 50 or more full-time equivalent workers (FTE) by subtracting the first 30 full time employees from the payment calculation (e.g., a firm with 51 workers that does not offer coverage will pay an amount equal to 51 minus 30, or 21 times the applicable per employee payment amount). The provision also changes the applicable payment amount for firms with more than 50 FTEs that do not offer coverage to $2,000 per full-time employee. It also eliminates the assessment for workers in a waiting period, while maintaining the 90-day limit on the length of any waiting period beginning in 2014.

Sec. 1004. Income definitions. Modifies the definition of income that is used for purposes of subsidy eligibility and the individual responsibility requirement. The modifications conform the income definition to information that is currently reported on the Form 1040 and to the present law income tax return filing thresholds. The provision also extends the exclusion from gross income for employer provided health coverage for adult children up to age 26.

Sec. 1005. Implementation funding. Provides $1 billion to the Secretary of Health and Human Services to finance the administrative costs of implementing health insurance reform.

Subtitle B – Medicare

Sec. 1101. Closing the Medicare prescription drug “donut hole”. Provides a $250 rebate for all Medicare Part D enrollees who enter the donut hole in 2010. Builds on pharmaceutical manufacturers’ 50% discount on brand-name drugs beginning in 2011 to completely close the donut hole with 75% discounts on brand-name and generic drugs by 2020.

Sec. 1102. Medicare Advantage payments. Freezes Medicare Advantage payments in 2011. Beginning in 2012, the provision reduces Medicare Advantage benchmarks relative to current levels. Benchmarks will vary from 95% of Medicare spending in high-cost areas to 115% of Medicare spending in low-cost areas. The changes will be phased-in over 3, 5 or 7 years, depending on the level of payment reductions. The provision creates an incentive system to increase payments to high-quality plans by at least 5%. It also extends CMS authority to adjust risk scores in Medicare Advantage for observed differences in coding patterns relative to fee-for?service.

Sec. 1103. Savings from limits on MA plan administrative costs. Ensures Medicare Advantage plans spend at least 85% of revenue on medical costs or activities that improve quality of care, rather than profit and overhead.

Sec. 1104. Disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments. Advances Medicare disproportionate share hospital cuts to begin in fiscal year 2014 but lowers the ten-year reduction by $3 billion.

Sec. 1105. Market basket updates. Revises the hospital market basket reduction that is in addition to the productivity adjustment as follows: -0.3 in FY14 and -0.75 in FY17, FY18 and FY19. Removes Senate provision that eliminates the additional market basket for hospitals based on coverage levels. Providers affected are inpatient hospitals, long-term care hospitals, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, psychiatric hospitals and outpatient hospitals.

Sec. 1106. Physician ownership-referral. Changes to December 31, 2010 the date after which physician ownership of hospitals to which they self refer is prohibited and provides a limited exception to the growth restrictions for grandfathered physician owned hospitals that treat the highest percentage of Medicaid patients in their county (and are not the sole hospital in a county).

Sec. 1107. Payment for Imaging Services. Sets the assumed utilization rate at 75 percent for the practice expense portion of advanced diagnostic imaging services.

Subtitle C – Medicaid

Sec. 1201. Federal funding for States. Strikes the provision for a permanent 100% federal matching rate for Nebraska for the Medicaid costs of newly eligible individuals. Provides federal Medicaid matching payments for the costs of services to newly eligible individuals at the following rates in all states except expansion states: 100% in 2014, 2015, and 2016; 95% in 2017; 94% in 2018; 93% in 2019; and 90% thereafter. In the case of expansion states, reduces the state share of the costs of covering nonpregnant childless adults by 50% in 2014, 60% in 2015, 70% in 2016, 80% in 2017, 90% in 2018. In 2019 and thereafter, expansion states would bear the same state share of the costs of covering nonpregnant childless adults as non-expansion states (e.g., 7% in 2019, 10% thereafter).

Sec. 1202. Payments to primary care physicians. Requires that Medicaid payment rates to primary care physicians for furnishing primary care services be no less than 100% of Medicare payment rates in 2013 and 2014 (the first year of the Senate bill’s Medicaid coverage expansion to all individuals with incomes under 133% of poverty). Provides 100% federal funding for the incremental costs to States of meeting this requirement.

Sec. 1203. Disproportionate share hospital payments. Lowers the reduction in federal Medicaid DSH payments from $18.1 billion to $14.1 billion and advances the reductions to begin in fiscal year 2014. Directs the Secretary to develop a methodology for reducing federal DSH allotments to all states in order to achieve the mandated reductions. Extends through FY 2013 the federal DSH allotment for a state that has a $0 allotment after FY 2011.

Sec. 1204. Funding for the territories. Increases federal funding in the Senate bill for Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Marianas Islands by $2 billion. Raises the caps on federal Medicaid funding for each of the territories. Allows each territory to elect to operate a Health Benefits Exchange.

Sec. 1205. Delay in Community First Choice Option. Postpones from October 1, 2010 until October 1, 2011 the effective date of the option established for State Medicaid programs to cover attendant care services and supports for individuals who require an institutional level of care

Sec. 1206. Drug rebates for new formulations of existing drugs. For purposes of applying the additional rebate, narrows the definition of a new formulation of a drug to a line extension of a single source or innovator multiple source drug that is an oral solid dosage form of the drug.

Subtitle D – Reducing Fraud, Waste, and Abuse

Sec. 1301. Community Mental Health Centers. Establishes new requirements for community mental health centers that provide Medicare partial hospitalization services in order to prevent fraud and abuse.

Sec. 1302. Medicare prepayment medical review limitations. Streamlines procedures to conduct Medicare prepayment reviews to facilitate additional reviews designed to reduce fraud and abuse.

Sec. 1303. CMS-IRS data match to identify fraudulent providers. Allows the Secretary of Treasury to share IRS data with HHS employees to help screen and identify fraudulent providers or providers with tax debts, and to help recover such debts. Provides strict controls on the use of such information to protect taxpayer privacy.

Sec. 1304. Funding to fight fraud, waste and abuse. Increases funding for the Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Fund by $250 million over the next decade. Indexes funds to fight Medicaid fraud based on the increase in the Consumer Price Index.

Sec. 1305. 90-day period of enhanced oversight for initial claims of DME suppliers. Requires a 90-day period to withhold payment and conduct enhanced oversight in cases where the HHS Secretary identifies a significant risk of fraud among DME suppliers.

Subtitle E – Revenues

Sec. 1401. High-cost plan excise tax. Reduces the revenue collected by the tax by 80 percent. This is achieved by: delaying the application of the tax until 2018, which gives the plans time to implement and realize the cost savings of reform; increasing the dollar thresholds to $10,200 for single coverage and $27,500 for family coverage ($11,850 and $30,950 for retirees and employees in high risk professions); excluding stand-alone dental and vision plans from the tax; and permitting an employer to reduce the cost of the coverage when applying the tax if the employer’s age and gender demographics are not representative of the age and gender demographics of a national risk pool. Under the modified provision, the dollar thresholds are indexed to inflation and the dollar thresholds are automatically increased in 2018 if CBO is wrong in its forecast of the premium inflation rate between now and 2018.

Sec. 1402. Medicare tax. Modifies the tax to include net investment income in the taxable base. Currently, the Medicare tax does not apply to net investment income. The Medicare tax on net investment income does not apply if modified adjusted gross income is less than $250,000 in the case of a joint return, or $200,000 in the case of a single return. Net investment income is interest, dividends, royalties, rents, gross income from a trade or business involving passive activities, and net gain from disposition of property (other than property held in a trade or business). Net investment income is reduced by properly allocable deductions to such income.

Sec. 1403. Delay of the annual limitation on contributions to a health FSA. Delays the provision by two years until 2013.

Sec. 1404. Brand name pharmaceuticals. Delays the industry fee on sales of brand name pharmaceuticals for use in government health programs by one year to 2011, and increases revenue raised by the fee by $4.8 billion.

Sec. 1405. Excise tax on medical device manufacturers. Delays the tax by two years to 2013 and converts the industry fee to an excise tax on the first sale for use of medical devices at a rate of 2.9 percent. Exempts from the tax Class I medical devices, eyeglasses, contact lenses, hearing aids, and any device of a type that is generally purchased by the public at retail for individual use.

Sec. 1406. Health insurance providers. Delays the industry fee by 3 years to 2014 and modifies the annual industry fee for revenue neutrality. In the case of tax-exempt insurance providers, provides that only 50 percent of their net premiums that relate to their tax-exempt status are taken into account in calculating the fee. Provides exemptions for voluntary employee benefit associations (VEBAs) and nonprofit providers more than 80 percent of whose revenues is received from Social Security Act programs that target low income, elderly, or disabled populations.

Sec. 1407. Delay of elimination of deduction for expenses allocable to Medicare part D subsidy. Delays the provision by two years to 2013.

Sec. 1408. Elimination of unintended application of cellulosic biofuel producer credit. Adds an additional revenue provision. In 2008, Congress enacted a $1.01 per gallon tax credit for the production of biofuel from cellulosic feedstocks in order to encourage the development of new production capacity for biofuels that are not derived from food source materials. Congress is aware that some taxpayers are seeking to claim the cellulosic biofuel tax credit for unprocessed fuels, such as black liquor. The provision would limit eligibility for the tax credit to processed fuels (i.e., fuels that could be used in a car engine or in a home heating application).

Sec. 1409. Codification of economic substance doctrine and penalties. Adds an additional revenue provision. The economic substance doctrine is a judicial doctrine that has been used by the courts to deny tax benefits when the transaction generating these tax benefits lacks economic substance. The courts have not applied the economic substance doctrine uniformly. The provision would clarify the manner in which the economic substance doctrine should be applied by the courts and would impose a penalty on understatements attributable to a transaction lacking economic substance.

Sec. 1410. Time for payment of corporate estimated taxes. Provides for a one-time adjustment to corporate estimated taxes for payments made during calendar year 2014.

Sec. 1411. No impact on Social Security trust funds. Provides that Title II of the Social Security Act (the old age, survivor, and disability benefits program (OASDI)) is not amended or modified by the bill.

Subtitle F – Other Provisions

Sec. 1501. TAA for communities. Appropriates $500 Million a year for fiscal years 2010 through 2014 in the Community College and Career Training Grant program for community colleges to develop and improve educational or career training programs. Ensures that each state receives at least 0.5 percent of the total funds appropriated.

Title II – Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

Subtitle A – Education

Section 2001. Short Title; References. Provides that this subtitle may be cited as the “SAFRA Act,” and that, except as otherwise provided, whenever an amendment to, or repeal of, a section or other provision, the reference shall be considered to be made to a section or other provision of the Higher Education Act of 1965.

Part I—Investing in Students and Families

Section 2101. Federal Pell Grants. Amends the Higher Education Act to include mandatory funding for the Pell Grant. This provides additional mandatory funding to augment funds appropriated to increase the federal maximum Pell Grant award by the change in the Consumer Price Index. The mandatory component of the funding is determined by inflating the previous year’s total and subtracting the maximum award provided for in the appropriations act for the previous year or $4860, whichever is greater. Beginning in the 2018-2019 academic year, the maximum Pell award will be at the 2017-2018 level.

Section 2102. Student Financial Assistance. This section provides $13.5 billion in mandatory appropriations to the Federal Pell Grant program.

Section 2103. College Access Challenge Grant Program. This section amends section 786 of the Higher Education Act by authorizing and appropriating $150 million for fiscal years 2010 through 2014 for the College Access Challenge Grant program created under the College Cost Reduction and Access Act of 2007. Provides that the allotment for each State under this section for a fiscal year shall not be an amount that is less than 1.0 percent of the total amount appropriated for a fiscal year.

Section 2104. Investment in Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Serving Institutions. This section amends section 371(b) of the Higher Education Act by extending funding for programs under this section created under the College Cost Reduction and Access Act of 2007 for programs at Historically Black Colleges and Universities and minority-serving institutions through 2019, including programs that help low-income students attain degrees in the fields of science, technology, engineering or mathematics by the following annual amounts: $100 million to Hispanic Serving Institutions, $85 million to Historically Black Colleges and Universities, $15 million to Predominantly Black Institutions, $30 million to Tribal Colleges and Universities, $15 million to Alaska, Hawaiian Native Institutions, $5 million to Asian American and Pacific Islander Institutions, and $5 million to Native American non-tribal serving institutions.

Part II—Student Loan Reform

Section 2201. Termination of Federal Family Education Loan Appropriations. This section terminates the authority to make or insure any additional loans in the Federal Family Education Loan program after June 30, 2010.

Section 2202. Termination of Federal loan Insurance Program. This section is a conforming amendment with regard to the termination of the FFEL program, limiting Federal insurance to those loans in the Federal Family Education Loan program for loans first disbursed prior to July 1, 2010.

Section 2203. Termination of Applicable Interest Rates. This section makes a conforming amendment with regard to the termination of the FFEL program limiting interest rate applicability to Stafford, Consolidation, and PLUS loans to those loans made before July 1, 2010.

Section 2204. Termination of Federal payments to Reduce Student Interest Costs. This section makes a conforming amendment with regard to the termination of the FFEL program by limiting subsidy payments to lenders for those loans for which the first disbursement is made before July 1, 2010.

Section 2205. Termination of FFEL PLUS Loans. This section makes a conforming change with regard to the termination of the FFEL program for federal PLUS loans by prohibiting further FFEL origination of loans after July 1, 2010.

Section 2206. Federal Consolidation Loans. This section makes conforming changes with regard to the termination of the FFEL program for federal consolidation loans. This section also provides that, for a 1 year period, borrowers who have loans under both the Direct Lending program and the FFEL program, or who have loans under either program as well as loans that have been sold to the Secretary, may consolidate such loans under the Direct Lending program regardless of whether such borrowers have entered repayment on such loans.

Section 2207. Termination of Unsubsidized Stafford loans for Middle-Income Borrowers. This section makes conforming changes with regard to the termination of the FFEL program for Unsubsidized Stafford loans by prohibiting further FFEL origination of loans after July 1, 2010.

Section 2208. Termination of Special Allowances. This section makes conforming changes with regard to the termination of the FFEL program by limiting special allowance payments to lenders under the FFEL program to loans first disbursed before July 1, 2010.

Section 2209. Origination of Direct Loans at Institutions Outside the United States. This section provides for the origination of federal Direct Loans at institutions located outside of the United States, through a financial institution designated by the Secretary.

Section 2210. Conforming amendments. This section makes conforming technical changes with regard to the termination of the FFEL program for Department of Education agreements with Direct Lending institutions.

Section 2211. Terms and Conditions of Loans. This section makes conforming technical changes with regard to the termination of the FFEL program to clarify the terms and conditions of Direct Loans.

Section 2212. Contracts. This section directs the Secretary to award contracts for servicing federal Direct Loans to eligible non-profit servicers. In addition, this section provides that for the first 100,000 borrower loan accounts, the Secretary shall establish a separate pricing tier. Specifies that the Secretary is to allocate the loan accounts of 100,000 borrowers to each eligible non-profit servicer. The section also permits the Secretary to reallocate, increase, reduce or terminate an eligible non-profit servicer’s allocation based on the performance of such servicer. In addition, this section appropriates mandatory funds to the Secretary to be obligated for administrative costs of servicing contracts with eligible non-profit servicers. This section also requires the Secretary to provide technical assistance to institutions of higher education participating or seeking to participate in the Direct Lending program. This section appropriates $50 million for fiscal year 2010 to pay for this technical assistance. Additionally, this section authorizes the Secretary to provide payments to loan servicers for retaining jobs at location in the United States where such servicers were operating on January 1, 2010. This section appropriates $25,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 and 2011 for such purpose.

Section 2213. Agreements with State-Owned Banks. This section amends Part D of Title IV to direct the Secretary to enter into an agreement with an eligible lender for the purpose of providing Federal loan insurance on student loans made by state-owned banks.

Section 2214. Income-Based Repayment. The section amends the Income-Based Repayment program to cap student loan payments for new borrowers after July 1, 2014 to 10% of adjusted income, from 15% percent, and to forgive remaining balances after 20 years of repayment, from 25 years.

Subtitle B – Health

Sec. 2301. Insurance Reforms. Extends the prohibition of lifetime limits, prohibition on rescissions, limitations on excessive waiting periods, and a requirement to provide coverage for non-dependent children up to age 26 to all existing health insurance plans starting six months after enactment. For group health plans, prohibits pre-existing condition exclusions in 2014, restricts annual limits beginning six months after enactment, and prohibits them starting in 2014. For coverage of non-dependent children prior to 2014, the requirement on group health plans is limited to those adult children without an employer offer of coverage.

Sec. 2302. Drugs Purchased by Covered Entities. Repeals the underlying 340B expansion to inpatient drugs and exemptions to GPO exclusion. Exempts orphan drugs from required discounts for new 340B entities.

Sec. 2303. Community Health Centers. Increases mandatory funding for community health centers to $11 billion over five years (FY 2011 – FY 2015).

Join Emptysuit On Twitter

Click On Links:
Votes On The Health Care Bill

Ten Major Benefits In Health Care Bill

Rush Limbaugh “We Need To Defeat These Bastards”

Complete Tape Of Rep. Emmanuel Cleaver Spitting Incident
Kevin Jackson Absolutely Destroy Race
Baiter David Shuster

Health Care Bill Mystery

Obama Admits He Does Not Know What’s In The Health Care Bill

Transcript: Bret Baier Interview With President Obama

Rush Limbaugh: Obama Is Destroying The Ecomomy

Rush Limbaugh Transcript: No, I’m Not Moving to Costa Rica

Democrats Positions On The Healthcare Reform Bill

Health Care Insurance And Health Care Benefits
Obama Forcing His View Of Health Care On America
The Votes On H.R.3962
About Emptysuit
Your Opinion

Share

Kevin Jackson Absolutely Destroy Race Baiter David Shuster

Visit Kevin Jackson, who blogs at The Black Sphere

Join Emptysuit On Twitter

Click On Links:
Black People Don’t Like Black Conservatives
Complete Tape Of Rep. Emmanuel Cleaver
Spitting Incident

Michelle Obama’s Chimp Faces

Health Care Bill Mystery

Transcript: Bret Baier Interview With President Obama

If I help him, he’s going to help me
Michelle Obama Chimp Image On Google
Child Dies In House Fire, Aunt Concerned About Her Food Stamps
The House Negro And The Field Negro

Michelle Obama Called Ghetto Girl
About Emptysuit
Your Opinion
The Race Card
Obama Kool Aid Drinkers

Share

Complete Tape Of Rep. Emmanuel Cleaver Spitting Incident

What did you see?

Join Emptysuit On Twitter

Click On Links:
Michelle Obama’s Chimp Faces

Health Care Bill Mystery

Obama Admits He Does Not Know What’s In The Health Care Bill

Transcript: Bret Baier Interview With President Obama

If I help him, he’s going to help me
Michelle Obama Chimp Image On Google
Black People Don’t Like Black Conservatives
Child Dies In House Fire, Aunt Concerned About Her Food Stamps
The House Negro And The Field Negro

Michelle Obama Called Ghetto Girl
About Emptysuit
Your Opinion
The Race Card
Obama Kool Aid Drinkers

Share

ACORN Closing

National ACORN spokesman Kevin Whelan said Monday that the organization’s board decided to close remaining state affiliates and field offices by April 1 because of falling revenues. Some other national operations will continue operating for at least several weeks before shutting for good. ACORN has faced a variety of allegations over the past two years, from voter registration fraud to Republican charges that it uses public funds for liberal political purposes. ACORN workers have gone to jail, and undercover tapes of ACORN workers seemingly giving advice on how to skirt the law.

The videos were recorded and posted online by James O’Keefe posed as a pimp and Hannah Giles, who posed as the prostitute in the undercover sting. The videos shows the pair approaching ACORN workers in Baltimore, San Bernadino, Washington DC, and Brooklyn asking them for advice on how to set up a prostitution ring involving more than a dozen underage girls from El Salvador. One of the ACORN workers suggests that Giles refer to herself as a “performing artist” on tax forms and declare some of the girls as dependents to receive child tax credits. “Stop saying prostitution,” the woman, identified by the filmmaker as an ACORN tax expert, tells Giles. The other woman tells them, “You want to keep them clean … make sure they go to school.” Several big affiliates, including ACORN New York and California,
broke away this year and changed their names in a bid to ditch the tarnished image of their parent organization and restore funding that ran dry in the wake of the video scandal. Brooklyn prosecutors cleared ACORN of criminal wrongdoing after a four-month probe that began when undercover conservative activists filmed workers giving what appeared to be illegal advice on how to hide money. Congress reacted by yanking ACORN’s federal funding, private donors held back cash and scores of ACORN offices closed. A U.S. judge reiterated an earlier ruling that the federal law blacklisting ACORN and groups allied with it was unconstitutional because it singled them out. ACORN could draw on 400,000 members to lobby for liberal causes, such as raising the minimum wage or adopting universal health care. ACORN was most successful at registering hundreds of thousands of low-income voters, some workers submitted forms signed by ‘Mickey Mouse’ or other cartoon characters.

A little ACORN History

The Sixties were an important time in the history of American politics. One of the groups that took risks, explored new ideas and developed a unique formula for a politics of justice in America was the National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO), led by George Wiley. By 1966, the NWRO had 170 groups in sixty cities across the nation. Wiley began an experiment that would explore the possibilities of a larger constituency for economic justice. He sent Wade Rathke, his young and highly talented organizer, to Little Rock, Arkansas to apply his creativity to the problem. He had to create a movement that would bring NWRO organizing to groups that should support it yet had little sympathy for its cause, such as conservative, low- and moderate-income Southern whites. When Rathke arrived in Little Rock in 1970, he began a campaign to help welfare recipients attain their basic needs – clothing and furniture. This drive, inspired by a clause in the Arkansas welfare laws, began the effort to create and sustain a social justice movement that would grow to become the Arkansas Community Organizations for Reform Now – ACORN. The goal was to unite welfare recipients with working people in need around issues of free school lunches for schoolchildren, unemployed workers’ concerns, Vietnam Veterans’ rights and hospital emergency room care. Many welfare rights members wanted a strictly welfare rights group and withdrew from the organization, fearing that they would lose control. After the split, the organization diversified further with the addition of the Vietnam Veterans Organizing Committee (VVOC) and the Unemployed Workers Organizing Committee (UWOC). The following year, ACORN leaders organized a “Save the City” campaign in Little Rock. The campaign addressed blue- collar homeowners’ concerns that their neighborhoods were being destroyed by traffic problems in the Centennial section, and by unscrupulous real estate agencies who engaged in blockbusting in the Oak Forest section.

ACORN began growing geographically, as well. It organized outside of Little Rock, establishing six regional offices in the state. One of the ACORN’s major statewide targets was Arkansas Power and Light. AP&L’s plan to build a huge coal-burning power plant in White Bluff presented a danger to farmers in the area. The farmers, organized into the Protect Our Land Association and Save Health and Property, demanded a $50 million damage deposit against AP&L’s potential destruction of farmers’ fields. Then, ACORN groups applied pressure on Governor Dale Bumpers, and Harvard University, a stockholder in AP&L. ACORN proved that it could organize in any setting and that ACORN members could contend effectively with even the big corporate players.

In 1972, ACORN made its first entry into electoral politics. ACORN’s Political Action Committee decided to back two candidates for Little Rock School Board, Doug Stevens and Bill Hamilton. Buoyed by their success, ACORN members decided to go one step further and run for office themselves. In 1974, ACORN members, joined by a group of International Ladies’ Garment Workers Union members, ran for seats on the Pulaski County Quorum Court. ACORN leaders seized the opportunity and ran a slate of candidates for the court. 250 candidates ran and 195 won.

In 1975, ACORN became a multi-state organization with new branches in Texas and South Dakota. ACORN national conventions and actions in 1978, 1979 and 1980 led to an entry into national politics through participation in the 1980 Presidential campaign. In December, 1978, ACORN held its first national convention in Memphis, Tennessee to discuss and initiate a national platform for low- and moderate- income people. The convention was planned to coincide with the National Democratic Party conference or “miniconvention”, which was conducting hearings to develop issues for the upcoming Democratic National Convention. July 1, 1979, ACORN’s second National Convention and Platform Conference was held in St. Louis. The purpose of the action was to refine the People’s Platform and to complete six-months of discussions in ACORN organizations around the country about their visions for the future of the nation. The planks included positions on energy, health care, taxes, housing, community development, banking, jobs and income, rural issues, and representation.

ACORN members confronted candidates and their aides, ran ACORN delegates for the Democratic National Convention and built coalition support for the ACORN Commission. The UAW, IAM, AFL-CIO and local and state party committees of the Democratic Party enlisted in the program. ACORN actions hit hard from Houston to Little Rock to Tampa to Davenport to St. Louis. ACORN members ran as delegates to the Democratic National Convention in New York in caucuses and primaries. The result was a contingent of forty- two delegates and alternates representing ACORN in the convention. On the floor of the convention, ACORN passed a resolution by voice vote establishing the ACORN Commission. By the end of the 20/80 Campaign, ACORN’s staff was stretched thin by the demands of meeting the goal of expanding to twenty states by 1980. Much of its resources and energy had been dedicated to participating in the presidential primaries and national conventions of the Republican and Democratic Parties.

Fifteen thousand ACORN members and their allies established “Reagan Ranches” in over 35 cities to protest Reagan policies of massive military spending and meager social spending. It was well publicized. This was a part of the political dimension of squatting. The original vision of the movement to win the power to control important decisions in American life for the majority continued to guide ACORN members and allies across the country. The people and the organization they comprise, 70,000 plus in twenty-eight states, grew in size, numbers, and maturity. Working at all levels of politics and in every corner of the country, ACORN has parlayed its building efforts into major victories. While some of ACORN’s most exciting efforts were in the area of housing, its victories also included health, public safety, education, representation, work and workers’ rights and communications concerns. The 1990 ACORN convention in Chicago focused on the fast-breaking housing campaign. It featured a squatting demonstration at an RTC house which was reclaimed for use in an ACORN neighborhood. Later, ACORN members, in a spirited action on the U.S. League of Savings Institutions, demanded cooperation from banks about providing loan data on low- and moderate-income communities and compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act. The housing issue continued to heat up in 1991, when ACORN fought back against bank lobbyist efforts to gut the CRA. ACORN members staged a two- day takeover of the House Banking Committee hearing room to be sure their voices were heard by Congress. Jack Kemp, Secretary of HUD under President Bush, listened, too, when ACORN persistently pursued him. As a result, ACORN won thousands of homes for low- and moderate-income people that the RTC had been auctioning to wealthy bidders before this important victory. The national media also listened when ACORN identified and publicized lending discrimination by banks to lower-income and minority applicants for mortgages. ACORN Housing Corporation, created to service people moving into homes under the housing campaign, rehabilitated hundreds of houses in low- and moderate-income communities around the country.

The ACORN convention in New York in 1992, the “ACORN-Bank Summit,” was organized to hammer out deals with giant banks like Continental, First Fidelity, Mellon, PriMerit, and Chemical. Representatives signed agreements to establish programs for low- and moderate-income people to qualify for mortgages in their communities. The meeting also led to increased Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac funding from the secondary mortgage market to ACORN neighborhoods. These efforts led to billions of dollars of primary and secondary mortgage money flowing into ACORN communities over a period of several years. ACORN parents won victories in New York, creating the Rockaways New School and PS 245, and in Chicago, where they established the Nicholson and Mason 21 schools. These small schools were set up as partnerships between parents and teachers to serve the local communities and improve children’s education. Also in Chicago, ACORN members saved Dewey elementary from closing twice and won funding to rehabilitate it. Dewey now has some of highest test scores in the Chicago school system.

In 1993, ACORN began a national campaign to fight insurance redlining, a practice that put the gains made in other housing campaigns at risk. Homeowners in low- and moderate-income communities could not get insurance or paid higher rates. The insurance redlining campaign targeted Allstate, hitting sales offices in fourteen cities and a Sears, Allstate’s parent company, stockholders meeting. Allstate agreed to negotiate and signed an agreement in 1994 for a $10 million partnership with ACORN and NationsBank for below-market mortgages to low-income home buyers. In 1994 the ACORN national convention, “Taking it to the Top,” was held in Washington, DC. Its goal was to meet with top government officials in the executive branch and Congress. Members met with Secretary of Education William Riley, Attorney General Janet Reno, Chair of the Federal Reserve Board Alan Greenspan, and HUD Secretary Henry Cisneros. This supplied needed support for ATU work for proper maintenance services, operating appliances, fair representation and the right to organize in Texas, Illinois, Connecticut, Ohio, and New York. ACORN took the lead in organizing broad-based community and labor coalitions in support of a living wage. By the close of the 90s, 41 cities had passed living wage laws requiring employers that receive government contracts or subsidies to pay their employees at least enough to lift a family of four above the poverty level. At the close of the 90s, ACORN was 125,000 members strong

2009 Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Latoya Lewis pled guilty on October 12, 2009 on charges of voter registration fraud. Lewis, who was working for ACORN when she committed the acts in 2008 that led to her guilty plea, said she was trying to “meet her quota as a paid registrar”.

2008 In Orange County, Florida, ACORN staffers submitted multiple, duplicate registrations on behalf of six separate voters over this summer. One individual had 21 duplicate applications. Election Supervisor Bill Cowles and his staff protested, noting in a June memo that ACORN had been submitting sloppy forms as well.

The Michigan Secretary of State office told the Detroit Free Press that ACORN had been submitting a sizeable number of duplicate and fraudulent applications to vote.

In Lake County, Indiana, election officials discovered “dozens of ACORN-delivered registration forms they believe contain inaccurate voter information, including one in which a dead man from Gary was listed as the applicant.” The applications were not processed.

In Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Sean Cairncross, the Republican Party’s chief lawyer said that ACORN is “engaged in systematic fraud and attempts to undermine our electoral system”. This was in the wake of a report that had hired at least seven felons as voter registration workers in the city. As of early October, Milwaukee election officials have referred to the Milwaukee County district attorney’s office 49 cases of people who submitted potentially fraudulent registration cards.

An ACORN employee in West Reading, Pennsylvania, was sentenced to up to 23 months in prison for identity theft and tampering with records. A second ACORN worker pleaded not guilty to the same charges and is free on $10,000 bail.

2007 In Washington, five Washington state ACORN workers were sentenced to jail time. ACORN agreed to pay King County $25,000 for its investigative costs and acknowledged that the national organization could be subject to criminal prosecution if fraud occurs again. According to King County Prosecuting Attorney Dan Satterberg, the misconduct was done “as an easy way to get paid [by ACORN], not as an attempt to influence the outcome of elections.

In Reynoldsburg, Ohio, Claudel Gilbert was indicted on two felony counts of illegal voting and false registration, after being registered by ACORN to vote in two separate counties. He pled guilty to the illegal voting charges, his lawyer claiming voter confusion rather than criminal intent. The charges of false registration were dropped by the Franklin County prosecutor’s office. Common Pleas Judge Richard A. Frye sentenced Gilbert to probation for one year and fined him $500 but suspended a six-month prison sentence.

In Missouri, four ACORN employees were indicted in Kansas City for charges including identity theft and filing false registrations during the 2006 election.

2006 On November 1, 2006, four part-time ACORN employees were indicted in Kansas City, Missouri for voter registration fraud. Prosecutors said the indictments are part of a national investigation. ACORN said in a press release that it is in part responsible in these individuals being caught, fired them, and cooperated and publicly supported efforts to look into the validity of the allegations.

ACORN was investigated in 2006 for submitting false voter registrations in St. Louis, Missouri. 1,492 fraudulent voter registrations were identified.

The Richland County (South Carolina) Voter Registration Office in October 2006 heard from a person who had received a new voter registration card without applying for it. On investigation, the office discovered the application had been turned in by an ACORN worker. The State Law Enforcement Division investigated the situation. They discovered that ACORN had recruited four Benedict College students to register new voters. The group’s political advisor found some had questionable entries, eventually firing all four workers. Two of the students were charged with election law violations for false swearing in applying for registration. In 2009, the case was settled and no penalties that may have been assessed against the students, who were minors at the time of the irregularities, were announced in public.

2005 In Colorado in January 2005, two Colorado ACORN workers were sentenced to community service for submitting false voter registrations. ACORN’s regional director said, “we find it abhorrent and do everything we can to prevent it from happening.”

In Virginia, the State Board of Elections admonished Project Vote and ACORN for turning in a significant number of faulty voter registrations. An audit revealed that 83% of sampled registrations that were rejected for carrying false or questionable information were submitted by Project Vote. Many of these registrations carried social security numbers that exist for other people, listed non-existent or commercial addresses, or were for convicted felons in violation of state and federal election law. In a letter to ACORN, the State Board of Elections reported that 56% of the voter registration applications ACORN turned in were ineligible. Further, a full 35% were not submitted in a timely manner, as required by law. The State Board of Elections also commented on what appeared to be evidence of intentional voter fraud. “Additionally,” they wrote, “information appears to have been altered on some applications where information given by the applicant in one color ink has been scratched through and re-entered in another color ink. Any alteration of a voter registration application is a Class 5 Felony in accordance with § 24.2-1009 of the Code of Virginia.”

2004 In Ohio in 2004, four ACORN employees were indicted by a federal grand jury for submitting false voter registration forms.

In Texas, ACORN turned in the voter registration form of David Young, who told reporters “The signature is not my signature. It’s not even close.” His social security number and date of birth were also incorrect.

In Pennsylvania, the director of elections in Reading reported receiving calls from numerous individuals complaining that ACORN employees deliberately put inaccurate information on their voter registration forms. The Berks County director of elections said voter fraud was “absolutely out of hand,” and added: “Not only do we have unintentional duplication of voter registration but we have blatant duplicate voter registrations.” The Berks County deputy director of elections added that ACORN was under investigation by the Department of Justice.

In Michigan, The Detroit Free Press reported that “overzealous or unscrupulous campaign workers in several Michigan counties are under investigation for voter-registration fraud, suspected of attempting to register nonexistent people or forging applications for already-registered voters.” ACORN-affiliate Project Vote was one of two groups suspected of turning in the documents.

In Florida, a Florida Department of Law Enforcement spokesman said ACORN was “singled out” among suspected voter registration groups for a 2004 wage initiative because it was “the common thread” in the agency’s fraud investigations.

According to public records, ACORN and several of its affiliates owe what amounts to millions of dollars in unpaid taxes. Though several of their tax liens, which are only issued after several attempts have been made to collect the debt, have been released, ACORN itself has at least three liens currently: two owed to the IRS for $547,312 and $132,997, as well as another concerning property they own in California for $33,978. ACORN Community Labor Organizing and SEIU owe $306,407 and $50,000 to the IRS, respectively.

Connecticut Officials in Connecticut are investigating ACORN after the name of a 7-year-old girl was found on a registration card as a 27 year old.

The Connecticut Elections Enforcement Commission is investigating a complaint that ACORN submitted fraudulent voter registration cards in Bridgeport. The complaint was filed by Joseph Borges, the registrar of voters for Bridgeport. He says he “found problems with numerous voter registration cards submitted by” the group. ACORN filed over 8,000 cards in Bridgeport.

Florida In Orange County, Florida, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement began in investigation in October2008 as to whether an ACORN worker forged an Orange County woman’s signature on a voter registration form and then turned it in. A separate voter registration card for Mickey Mouse was turned in. ACORN workers in Florida report having a quota system under which they are paid $8.00/hour and must turn in 20 registration cards per work shift.

In September 2009, 11 ACORN workers were accused by Florida prosecutors of falsifying information on 888 voter registration forms.

Indiana ACORN submitted 5,000 voter registration forms in Lake County, Indiana in September and October 2008. Local election officials say that about half of the forms are fraudulent. Eric Weathersby, executive director of the group’s Northwest Indiana office, said that workers were asked to bring in 20 registrations a day, but “it was not a quota they had to meet”. Ruthann Hoagland of the Lake County election board said the first 2,100 cards they looked at were phony. “Everything on the card filled out looks exactly the same.”

Louisiana In June 2008, a spokesman from Project Vote, an ACORN affiliate, acknowledged that 35 percent of the cards turned into Louisiana officials were duplicates. One woman had five cards turned in for her, and told election officials that she had completed none of them.

On October 23, it was learned that 50% of the 8,600 voter registrations turned in by the national group Voting Is Power, affiliated with ACORN, were incomplete or incorrectly filled out. U.S. Senator David Vitter, R-Metairie, has asked the state’s three U.S. attorneys and its FBI special agent in charge to launch investigations.

Ernie Roberson, the Caddo Parish Registrar of Voters, said the group’s registrations make up “better than 5 percent of the registered voter base in Caddo that just magically appeared in our office over a 10-day period.” Many cards had names and addresses taken from the phone book, and information on them, such as ethnicity, Social Security numbers, dates of birth or signatures, were false, or in some cases came from people who have been dead for some time.

Of the cards: 65% (5,600) were deemed invalid. In Jefferson Parish, VIP turned in 2,689 cards, of which 1,135 — or 42 percent — were invalid.”

Michigan The Michigan Secretary of State told the press in September that Acorn had submitted “a sizeable number of duplicate and fraudulent applications.”

Minnesota According to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, ACORN staff in two counties, Hennepin and Ramsey, turned in forms past the 10-day window allowed. The Hennepin County Attorney’s office said on October 14 that it is investigating whether a voter registration processing lapse at the Minnesota ACORN office falls within guidelines for criminal prosecution. The International Falls Daily Journal asked for an investigation.

Missouri In early October 2008, officials in Jackson County, Missouri, initiated an investigation of Acorn voter registrations. Charlene Davis, Jackson County’s election board co-director said, “I don’t even know the entire scope of it because registrations are coming in so heavy.” The investigation discovered that more than 400 registration cards with false names and addresses were turned in by Acorn workers, and also identified in the one county about 100 duplicates, 280 addresses that don’t exist, people who have driver’s licenses that don’t verify and Social Security numbers that don’t verify. Some of the cards are without addresses. Eight ex-ACORNworkers pled guilty in federal court to fraud charges in April for submitting registrations in 2006 with fake names, fake addresses, and forged signatures. Each may be sentenced to up to five years in jail and significant fines.

Nevada In August 2009, ACORN’s former Las Vegas field director, Christopher Edwards, agreed to testify against ACORN in a case in which Las Vegas election officials say 48% of the voter registration forms the group turned in were “clearly fraudulent.” He then testified before a judge that during the summer of 2008, he paid voter registration workers a $5 bonus if they turned in 21 or more voter registration cards in a day. Such bonuses are illegal under Nevada law, according to state prosecutors. A Nevada judge is considering whether Amy Busefink, who supervised Edwards in 2008, should stand trial on 13 felony charges of compensation for registration of voters. When Edwards testified, he told Justice of the Peace William D. Jansen that “No one in ACORN knew this was illegal.”

In October 2008, Nevada’s Democratic Secretary of State Ross Miller requested a raid on Acorn’s offices, following complaints of false names and fictional addresses (including the starting lineup of the Dallas Cowboys).

On July 7, 2008 the Las Vegas Review-Journal reported that a Clark County, Nevada official “sees rampant fraud in the 2,000 to 3,000 registrations ACORN turns in every week.”.

The ACORN office in Nevada office was raided by law enforcement officials who were seeking additional information on accusations that the group had hired 59 felons and had submitted 30 apparently fraudulent registration cards.

On October 6, 2009, a criminal investigator with the Nevada Secretary of State filed a search-warrant affidavit stating that ACORN hired 59 state prison inmates to collect voter-registration forms. These include:

Jason Anderson, currently imprisoned for burglary and firearms violations at the state’s Casa Grande halfway house in Las Vegas. Anderson was a team leader for ACORN, and told investigators that some of his co-workers “hired by ACORN were ‘lazy crack-heads’ who were not interested in working and just wanted the money.”

Darmela Jone who said she “submitted approximately 40 Voter Registration Applications while employed at ACORN and only 10 were real applications.”

An ACORN canvasser, according to the complaint, “was caught completing forms using names and addresses copied from the telephone book.”

A Nevada woman, Roberta Casteel, who had not registered to vote, learned that nevertheless a voter-registration application was submitted to the state by ACORN which included her name, driver’s license number and Social Security number

New Mexico On October 17, the Republican Party in New Mexico announced it had found 28 fraudulent voters in a Democratic primary earlier in 2008. The GOP said it looked at the data from 92 newly registered voters in the district, finding 28 that had “missing or inaccurate Social Security numbers or birth dates. In some cases, more than one voter was registered using the same Social Security number. In others, people who the Republicans said had no Social Security number on public record were registered.” Before the primary, ACORN was one of the organizations registering voters in the area. State Rep. Justine Fox (R-Albuquerque) said, “This is a bombshell. We now have undeniable proof that a significant number of fraudulent voters were cast in Democrat primary races for the New Mexico state legislature as a result of ACORN’s voter registration fraud.” The vote took place in House District 13, where no Republican ran for the seat.

On September 17, the Bernalillo County clerk notified prosecutors that about 1,100 possibly fraudulent voter registration cards have been turned in to her office. The cards in question involve issues such as:

The same name as a voter who’s already registered, but carry a different birth date or Social Security number.

Listing a social security number for a different person than the person whose card it is supposed to be.

Addresses that don’t exist.

In August, the Albuquerque Journal reported that Acorn had turned in a forged card for Rebecca Sitterly, a former state District Court judge from Albuquerque who has been voting in the same place for nearly two decades.

North Carolina In Durham, North Carolina, the State Board of Elections officials in early October investigated 100 voter registration forms submitted by a local branch of Acorn when “All of a sudden, I started seeing the same names over and over again”, according to Mike Ashe, county elections director. He said some forms had similar names but different addresses or dates of birth.

Ohio The Cuyahoga County Board of Elections referred more 14 cases of potential voter registration fraud to the county prosecutor today as part of an investigation of suspicious registration cards submitted by ACORN.

Freddie Johnson of Cleveland, Ohio, testified before the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections that Acorn workers asked him to sign 73 voter registration forms. Johnson also told an Ohio newspaper that he was given cash and cigarettes by ACORN activists he described as “aggressive”. John additionally testified that the Acorn workers told him they were paid by the signature, and that he was helping them earn additional pay by continuing to sign his name for them.

On October 14, The Buckeye Institute filed a state RICO action against the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) on behalf of two Warren County, Ohio voters. The action filed in Warren County Court of Common Pleas alleges ACORN has engaged in a pattern of corrupt activity that amounts to organized crime. The lawsuit seeks ACORN’s dissolution as a legal entity, the revocation of any licenses in Ohio, and an injunction against fraudulent voter registration and other illegal activities.

Pennsylvania Dauphin County: Luis Torres-Serrano is accused of submitting over hundred fraudulent voter registration forms he collected on behalf of ACORN. Authorities are offering a $2,000 award for information on the whereabouts of Torres-Serrano. He is charged with 19 counts of perjury, making false statements and identity theft. County law enforcement officials were alerted to the possible criminal actions by Dauphin County elections head Steven G. Chiavetta; he became aware of the problem when people contacted his office to ask why they had received a new voter registration form when they had never filled out a card.

Delaware County: A man working for ACORN was arrested on October 21 for submitting 18 false voter registration forms.

Philadelphia: Official here are seeking an investigation into ACORN’s voter registration program because they “were fed up with false applications gumming up the works” and “specifically accused” ACORN of turning in bad paperwork. ACORN along with other organizations submitted over 250,000 registration forms in Philadelphia in 2008. Many were rejected because they were duplicates, but another 5,000 are questionable because of non-existent addresses. Others are being rejected due to incorrect birthdays, social security numbers, or because those registered are children. Some individuals close to the organization say that ACORN workers are judged by unspoken quotas, leading them to make up registration cards, a charge the organization is denying.

Pittsburgh: A Pittsburgh-area district attorney is probing ACORN voter registrations in the wake of complaints about possible forgery and irregularities in registration forms submitted by the group. an organization already under investigation in several states.

West Reading: An ACORN worker was sentenced to up to 23 months in prison for identity theft and tampering with records. A second ACORN worker pleaded not guilty to the same charges and is free on $10,000 bail.

York: An ACORN worker in York was arrested for submitting 100 fraudulent registrations.

Statewide: ACORN turned in 78,376 voter applications from April 28, 2008 through October 6, 2008. As of October 24, 6,962 had been rejected by election officials for reasons other than duplication. An additional 80,000 voter applications were duplicates, including those turned in by Acorn and other groups.

Lawsuit: The Republican Party of Pennsylvania announced on October 17 that they were filing a lawsuit against Pedro Cortes and ACORN and its subsidiaries. The press conference to announce the lawsuit included former Supreme Court Justice and PAGOP Fair Elections Task Force Chair Sandra Newman. The basis for the lawsuit was a claim of voter dilution. Craig Williams, who is a candidate in the 7th Congressional district and a former Federal prosecutor, is a co-plaintiff. Williams said, “Voter fraud is a crime against democracy and violates a critical tenet of our system of government: one person, one vote.”

Texas ACORN turned in 30,000 registration cards ACORN in Harris County, Texas. Tax assesssor Paul Bettencourt reported that 33% are invalid and noted some specifics:

A church was listed as the voter registration address for 150 people.

About 250 cards listed the address of a homeless outreach center as their home address.

Wisconsin Seven felons were hired by ACORN to register voters in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Previous convictions were for robbery and cocaine possession. The seven had been designated as special registration deputies, allowing them to solicit and keep voter registration applications before turning them in to local election officials. One special registration deputy has a pending felony charge for heroin possession and another is facing a misdemeanor prostitution charge. A third was convicted of misdemeanor prostitution. The law says anyone who can vote can be a special registration deputy, and felons can vote as long as they are no longer on probation or parole. But the attorney for the Government Accountability Board, which runs elections, issued an April 3 memo saying the board’s staff believed convicted felons couldn’t serve in the role.

A criminal complaint accuses 29-year-old Frank Walton of Oak Creek with submitting 54 false voter registrations in June. Some of the registrations listed vacant buildings as addresses, others had false driver’s license numbers and still others had false Social Security numbers. Others charged with vote fraud include Adam Mucklin for illegally registering to vote , and charges against Endalyn Adams, who worked for ACORN, for submitting dozens of fake voter registrations.

ACORN employee Adams is charged with submitting 45 forms, about twenty-seven or 60% of which contained information alleged to be false, including 19 voter forms listed persons that do not appear to exist, 19 voter registration forms were determined by police investigators to be nonexistent, 22 of the driver license numbers were fraudulent.

Latoya Lewis pled guilty on October 12, 2009 on charges of voter registration fraud. Lewis, who was working for ACORN when she committed the acts in 2008 that led to her guilty plea, said she was trying to “meet her quota as a paid registrar”.

Virginia A voter-registration worker was indicted in Norfolk, Virginia, on October 16 for election fraud. The woman worked for the Community Voters Project, which is an ACORN affiliate. She was charged with three counts of felony election fraud for giving voter-registration applications containing false information to the Norfolk voter registrar’s office.

Three members of the same group had previously been charged (in July 2008) with voter fraud after the registrar in Norfolk found irregularities with hundreds of applications submitted by eight to ten canvassers. The registrar has referred some of that paperwork to law enforcement. The problems in Hampton and Norfolk are said by a local newspaper to have been the result of a quota system used by the Community Voters Project.

In Hampton, Virginia, election officials said on October 16 that “dubious applications are nothing new, but that this year the numbers are “off the charts.” The phony applications are brazen, according to a local newspaper, involving behaviors such as listing fake names, addresses and phone numbers.

Comment Only On Twitter

Click On Links:
Obama’s ACORN Exposed With Undercover Video
Three Undercover Videos Of ACORN
Fourth ACORN Video
Obama’s State Of The Union
Obama Call For Spending Freezes
Summary Of The Defense Appropriation Bill
Why Liberals Hate Free Speech
The Race Card
Impeach Obama
The World’s Most Powerful People
H.R. 3962 Summary
Obama Attack The Supreme Court
Obama’s Approval Rating
About Emptysuit
Your Opinion
The House Negro And The Field Negro
Black People Don’t Like Black Conservatives

Share

Transcript: Rush Limbaugh “We Need To Defeat These Basta

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Today, as we start the radio program, America is hanging by a thread. So we have to see what we can do with a thread. At the end of the day our freedom has been assaulted. This is the kind of change that people did not think they were going to get when they voted for Barack Obama. Freedom must win the day.

Great to have you here. We’ll be talking to you about all of this, 800-282-2882 is the number, the e-mail address, ElRushbo@eibnet.com.

You have to deal with reality here, and that means focusing on the future. Now, there are some people who want to look back at the past and say, “How did we get here?” and that’s all fine and dandy, but we know how we got here. Barack Obama was elected president. If you want to go back any further than that, we can, but we are here because Barack Obama was elected president. We are here because the Democrat Party has a majority in the Senate and the House of Representatives.

There’s a lot of anger at Bart Stupak today. Bart Stupak was always going to vote for this. The thing that Bart Stupak needs to be hounded out of office for is for misleading an entire nation and giving an entire nation a big fake feint job that he and his cohorts were somehow going to do something to stop this on the basis of a false premise anyway. I want you to hear a piece of audio from Stupak, and this is October 24th in Sheboygan, Michigan. He held a town hall meeting — this is Internet quality here — he held a town hall meeting, and he told a questioner, he told one of his voters that if he liked everything but the abortion funding he would vote for it. He said this last October.

STUPAK: If everything I want [is] in the final bill, I like everything in the bill except you have public funding for abortion, and we had a chance to run our amendment and we lost. Okay, I voted my conscience, stayed true to my principles, stayed true to the beliefs of this district, could I vote for healthcare? Yes I still could.

RUSH: And he did. He was always going to, as were the moderate Democrats. There were some of them that were given a chance to vote “no” because they had enough of a majority last night, but up until four o’clock yesterday afternoon theoretically Pelosi did not have the votes. I’m asking myself what kind of country are we today. We’re not a representative republic. The will of the people was spat upon yesterday. The will of the people is of no concern to the people who now have power and authority from the White House all the way down to Capitol Hill. The will of the people is something to be crushed. So we’re not a representative republic. You can’t even say loosely defined we are much of a democracy. We have to restore these things. We have to do this by getting rid of these people at the ballot box. We must get them out of office. That’s the only thing here. I hear people talking about repeal, and that’s great, but there’s something that has to happen before we can do that. We can’t repeal this thing as we sit here today. We don’t have the votes. We didn’t have the votes to stop it. We’re not going to have the votes to repeal it. We have to start winning elections.

But I’m going to tell everybody in the Republican Party that’s running around talking about repeal, it better be more than a campaign slogan. You better mean it. Don’t declare something as principle and then play it like a five dollar poker chip like Bart Stupak did. Stupak has humiliated and disgraced himself. He lied because he held out the hope of millions of Americans that this travesty would not happen. Bart Stupak has not only humiliated and disgraced himself; he has as big a role in destroying this country as it was founded, as Barack Obama does. Last night, Bart Stupak damaged the already crippled Democrat Party more than he knows, more than they know. That executive order, totally laughable, Stupak just wanted his “notice me” moment. Stupak is no different than Neville Chamberlain, came back with that little letter from Hitler, “Oh, yeah, Hitler says no war between his country and ours.” Churchill said, “Well, you’re a fool.”

Well, Stupak got his executive order. Which is worthless, can be rescinded, but it does not have the ability to counter statute. So whatever’s in the Senate bill, and there is federal funding for abortion in the bill, and folks, make no question, the lies that we have been told about what’s in this bill, what’s not in this bill, it is an utter disaster, and if you want we can spend some time today going through some of these individual items, which we’ve been doing for a year-and-a-half. The point is, the American people have awakened and they finally have seen what statists look like and what they do and how they act.

Even McCain, who as recently as a year ago wanted to “walk across the aisle” and work with these people, said today he’s upset just looking at how happy they are at what they’ve done. Of course, it need not have happened had we… Well, I don’t even want to go there. Focusing on the past is only relevant in terms of how we learn from it and not make the same mistakes in the future. So yep, we repeal — fine and dandy — and we take these lawsuits. These lawsuits are an uphill climb. We can’t rely on lawsuits to win the day. I mean, they need to be filed and they need to be argued, and we need to push back in every direction, but the focus has to be on defeating Democrats in November in these midterm elections. We have the people. We have the intellectual arguments. We have the common sense arguments. We have history. But they won yesterday.

They won because they held Congress and the presidency, and therein lies the lesson: We need to defeat these bastards. We need to wipe them out. We need to chase them out of town. But we need to do more than that. We need to elect conservatives. If there are Republican primaries, elect conservatives and then defeat the Democrats — every last one of them — and then we start the repeal process. And by “repeal,” I mean use every single legislative and bureaucratic tactic we can muster to obstruct, derail, and defeat them. Just saying “repeal” does not make it happen. We’re going to have turn out en masse in November and stop these people. As you have seen, the law will not stop them, the Constitution will not stop them, hoping that they will do the right thing will not stop them because their definition of “the right thing” has nothing in common with ours.

They must, my friends, be hounded out of office. Every single Democrat who voted for this needs to know, safe district or not, that they are going to be exposed and hassled and chased from office. We now have leftist radicals in charge of your health care decisions rather than doctors. I got up today and I said, “We’re hanging by a thread,” and there’s a difficult balancing act on this program today: Dealing with the reality of what has happened, which can’t be candy coated, with the need to fight on. The need to fight on and the urging to fight on must have some substance to it and not just be rhetoric and language and lingo. It has to have some substance behind it, because we really are facing the prospect that our country will never be the same after yesterday, if this stands. It will never be the same, and a majority of the American people understood it.

A majority of the American people understand it and know it and are outraged by this. Americans are now eagerly awaiting their insurance premiums to be reduced by $2500 a year. Obama has been promising this since his presidential campaign of 2008. Americans are now eagerly awaiting for all of the uninsured to magically have health insurance. The American people are now waiting for their premiums to magically go down, for their access to go up. I was listening to some of the Democrats in the media last night. Juan Williams on Fox was just excited. “Oh, my God, this is so wonderful! It’s so wonderful! No more preexisting conditions! No more preexisting conditions! Everybody gets insurance,” and I’m saying, “Does anybody not understand economics here?” We’re not even talking about an insurance business anymore.

What’s happened here is not insurance. Insurance is you insure yourself against a catastrophe, something that might happen to wipe you out. This is not insurance. This is simply the insurance companies being captivated or taken over by the government and having their behavior mandated for the express purpose of putting them out of business. Under this bill, as I told you last week, you don’t have to buy insurance. You can wait until the accident or the illness happens and then buy it that day, and they have to sell it to you. No matter what. If you get terminal cancer and the doctor gives you three months, they have to sell you your coverage. Except you’re not going to have to buy it. If you can’t afford it, we — all your neighbors — will. No insurance company can stay in business doing this.

It’s the same thing with preexisting conditions. No preexisting condition? The liberals keep talking about automobile insurance companies. What happens to you, you have an automobile policy, you’re driving around, and you have an accident and you do a lot of damage? Hey, guess what? You are a higher risk. Your auto insurance premium goes up, right? Why shouldn’t that happen with health care? Why shouldn’t it? (whining) “It’s not fair? No, it’s not fair!” Well, it won’t now. It won’t now. So, yeah, preexisting conditions are going to be covered, but who’s going to pay for this? Insurance premiums are going to skyrocket in the next couple of years until they are out of business and the government steps in to take over with the…public option. Which is just waiting a couple of months, couple of days, couple years down the tracks. It’s just waiting for this to happen because this bill mandates the destruction of the private health insurance business.

END TRANSCRIPT

Comment Only On Twitter

Click On Links:
Health Care Bill Mystery

Obama Admits He Does Not Know What’s In The Health Care Bill

Transcript: Bret Baier Interview With President Obama

Rush Limbaugh: Obama Is Destroying The Ecomomy

Rush Limbaugh Transcript: No, I’m Not Moving to Costa Rica

Democrats Positions On The Healthcare Reform Bill

Health Care Insurance And Health Care Benefits
Obama Forcing His View Of Health Care On America
Summary Of Obama’s Proposal For Health Care Reform
H.R. 3962 Summary
Affordable Health Care For America Act “H.R. 3962″
Obama’s Health Care, A Bad Idea
H.R. 3962 Tax Hikes
The Votes On H.R.3962
Obama Health Reform Lies
US Voters Want Congress To Drop Health
About Emptysuit
Your Opinion

Share

Mitt Romney: Obama’s ‘Unconscionable Abuse Of Power’

A Campaign Begins Today   [Mitt Romney]: America has just witnessed an unconscionable abuse of power. President Obama has betrayed his oath to the nation — rather than bringing us together, ushering in a new kind of politics, and rising above raw partisanship, he has succumbed to the lowest denominator of incumbent power: justifying the means by extolling the ends. He promised better; we deserved better.

He calls his accomplishment “historic” — in this he is correct, although not for the reason he intends. Rather, it is an historic usurpation of the legislative process — he unleashed the nuclear option, enlisted not a single Republican vote in either chamber, bribed reluctant members of his own party, paid-off his union backers, scapegoated insurers, and justified his act with patently fraudulent accounting. What Barack Obama has ushered into the American political landscape is not good for our country; in the words of an ancient maxim, “what starts twisted, ends twisted.”

His health-care bill is unhealthy for America. It raises taxes, slashes the more private side of Medicare, installs price controls, and puts a new federal bureaucracy in charge of health care. It will create a new entitlement even as the ones we already have are bankrupt. For these reasons and more, the act should be repealed. That campaign begins today.

— Mitt Romney is the former governor of Massachusetts and author of No Apology.

Join Emptysuit On Twitter

Click On Links:
Ten Major Benefits In Health Care Bill

Votes On The Health Care Bill

Idaho Would Sue Government Over Health Care Reform ‎
Summary: Health Care Reform Bill H.R. 4872

Obama Admits He Does Not Know What’s In The Health Care Bill

Transcript: Bret Baier Interview With President Obama

Rush Limbaugh Transcript: No, I’m Not Moving to Costa Rica

Health Care Insurance And Health Care Benefits
Summary Of Obama’s Proposal For Health Care Reform
H.R. 3962 Summary
Affordable Health Care For America Act “H.R. 3962″
Obama’s Health Care, A Bad Idea
H.R. 3962 Tax Hikes
The Votes On H.R.3962
US Voters Want Congress To Drop Health
About Emptysuit
Your Opinion

Share


Ten Major Benefits In Health Care Bill

  • Prohibit pre-existing condition exclusions for children in all new plans;
  • Provide immediate access to insurance for uninsured Americans who are uninsured because of a pre-existing condition through a temporary high-risk pool;
  • Prohibit dropping people from coverage when they get sick in all individual plans;
  • Lower seniors’ prescription drug prices by beginning to close the donut hole;
  • Offer tax credits to small businesses to purchase coverage;
  • Eliminate lifetime limits and restrictive annual limits on benefits in all plans;
  • Require plans to cover an enrollee’s dependent children until age 26;
  • Require new plans to cover preventive services and immunizations without cost-sharing;
  • Ensure consumers have access to an effective internal and external appeals process to appeal new insurance plan decisions;
  • Require premium rebates to enrollees from insurers with high administrative expenditures and require public disclosure of the percent of premiums applied to overhead costs.

Join Emptysuit On Twitter

Click On Links:
Votes On The Health Care Bill

Idaho Would Sue Government Over Health Care Reform ‎
Summary: Health Care Reform Bill H.R. 4872

Obama Admits He Does Not Know What’s In The Health Care Bill

Transcript: Bret Baier Interview With President Obama

Rush Limbaugh Transcript: No, I’m Not Moving to Costa Rica

Health Care Insurance And Health Care Benefits
Summary Of Obama’s Proposal For Health Care Reform
H.R. 3962 Summary
Affordable Health Care For America Act “H.R. 3962″
Obama’s Health Care, A Bad Idea
H.R. 3962 Tax Hikes
The Votes On H.R.3962
US Voters Want Congress To Drop Health
About Emptysuit
Your Opinion

Share

Votes On The Health Care Bill

In one of the most closely watched votes in history, all Republicans voted against the bill and 219 Democrats supported it. A total of 212 members voted against it.

Here is a list of the Democrats who crossed the aisle and voted against the bill:

Rep. John Adler (N.J.)
Rep. Jason Altmire (Pa.)
Rep. Michael Arcuri (N.Y.)
Rep. John Barrow (Ga.)
Rep. Marion Berry (Ark.)
Rep. Dan Boren (Ind.)
Rep. Rick Boucher (Va.)
Rep. Bobby Bright (Ala.)
Rep. Ben Chandler (Ky.)
Rep. Travis Childers (Miss.)
Rep. Artur Davis (Ala.)
Rep. Lincoln Davis (Tenn.)
Rep. Chet Edwards (Texas)
Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (S.D.)
Rep. Tim Holden (Pa.)
Rep. Larry Kissell (N.C.)
Rep. Frank Kratovil (Md.)
Rep. Dan Lipinski (Ill.)
Rep. Stephen Lynch (Mass.)
Rep. Jim Marshall (Ga.)
Rep. Jim Matheson (Utah)
Rep. Mike McIntyre (N.C.)
Rep. Mike McMahon (N.Y.)
Rep. Charlie Melancon (La.)
Rep. Walt Minnick (Idaho)
Rep. Glenn Nye (Va.)
Rep. Collin Peterson (Minn.)
Rep. Mike Ross (Ark.)
Rep. Heath Shuler (N.C.)
Rep. Ike Skelton (Mo.)
Rep. Zack Space (Ohio)
Rep. John Tanner (Tenn.)
Rep. Gene Taylor (Miss.)
Rep. Harry Teague (N.M.)

Ayes Noes PRES NV
Democratic 219 34
Republican 178
Independent
TOTALS 219 212

—- AYES    219 —

Ackerman
Andrews
Baca
Baird
Baldwin
Bean
Becerra
Berkley
Berman
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Boccieri
Boswell
Boyd
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Brown, Corrine
Butterfield
Capps
Capuano
Cardoza
Carnahan
Carney
Carson (IN)
Castor (FL)
Chu
Clarke
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly (VA)
Conyers
Cooper
Costa
Costello
Courtney
Crowley
Cuellar
Cummings
Dahlkemper
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
DeFazio
DeGette
Delahunt
DeLauro
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Donnelly (IN)
Doyle
Driehaus
Edwards (MD)
Ellison
Ellsworth
Engel
Eshoo
Etheridge
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Foster
Frank (MA)
Fudge
Garamendi
Giffords
Gonzalez
Gordon (TN)
Grayson
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hall (NY)
Halvorson
Hare
Harman
Hastings (FL)
Heinrich
Higgins
Hill
Himes
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hirono
Hodes
Holt
Honda
Hoyer
Inslee
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson Lee (TX)
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Kagen
Kanjorski
Kaptur
Kennedy
Kildee
Kilpatrick (MI)
Kilroy
Kind
Kirkpatrick (AZ)
Klein (FL)
Kosmas
Kucinich
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Loebsack
Lofgren, Zoe
Lowey
Luján
Maffei
Maloney
Markey (CO)
Markey (MA)
Matsui
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McNerney
Meek (FL)
Meeks (NY)
Michaud
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Mitchell
Mollohan
Moore (KS)
Moore (WI)
Moran (VA)
Murphy (CT)
Murphy (NY)
Murphy, Patrick
Nadler (NY)
Napolitano
Neal (MA)
Oberstar
Obey
Olver
Ortiz
Owens
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Perriello
Peters
Pingree (ME)
Polis (CO)
Pomeroy
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Reyes
Richardson
Rodriguez
Rothman (NJ)
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Salazar
Sánchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schauer
Schiff
Schrader
Schwartz
Scott (GA)
Scott (VA)
Serrano
Sestak
Shea-Porter
Sherman
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (WA)
Snyder
Speier
Spratt
Stark
Stupak
Sutton
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Titus
Tonko
Towns
Tsongas
Van Hollen
Velázquez
Visclosky
Walz
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watson
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Welch
Wilson (OH)
Woolsey
Wu
Yarmuth

—- NOES    212 —

Aderholt
Adler (NJ)
Akin
Alexander
Altmire
Arcuri
Austria
Bachmann
Bachus
Barrett (SC)
Barrow
Bartlett
Barton (TX)
Berry
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blunt
Boehner
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boozman
Boren
Boucher
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Bright
Broun (GA)
Brown (SC)
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Buchanan
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Buyer
Calvert
Camp
Campbell
Cantor
Cao
Capito
Carter
Cassidy
Castle
Chaffetz
Chandler
Childers
Coble
Coffman (CO)
Cole
Conaway
Crenshaw
Culberson
Davis (AL)
Davis (KY)
Davis (TN)
Deal (GA)
Dent
Diaz-Balart, L.
Diaz-Balart, M.
Dreier
Duncan
Edwards (TX)
Ehlers
Emerson
Fallin
Flake
Fleming
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Frelinghuysen
Gallegly
Garrett (NJ)
Gerlach
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Granger
Graves
Griffith
Guthrie
Hall (TX)
Harper
Hastings (WA)
Heller
Hensarling
Herger
Herseth Sandlin
Hoekstra
Holden
Hunter
Inglis
Issa
Jenkins
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Jordan (OH)
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kirk
Kissell
Kline (MN)
Kratovil
Lamborn
Lance
Latham
LaTourette
Latta
Lee (NY)
Lewis (CA)
Linder
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Lungren, Daniel E.
Lynch
Mack
Manzullo
Marchant
Marshall
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McClintock
McCotter
McHenry
McIntyre
McKeon
McMahon
McMorris Rodgers
Melancon
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Minnick
Moran (KS)
Murphy, Tim
Myrick
Neugebauer
Nunes
Nye
Olson
Paul
Paulsen
Pence
Peterson
Petri
Pitts
Platts
Poe (TX)
Posey
Price (GA)
Putnam
Radanovich
Rehberg
Reichert
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross
Royce
Ryan (WI)
Scalise
Schmidt
Schock
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shadegg
Shimkus
Shuler
Shuster
Simpson
Skelton
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Souder
Space
Stearns
Sullivan
Tanner
Taylor
Teague
Terry
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Tiberi
Turner
Upton
Walden
Wamp
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Young (AK)
Young (FL)

Join Emptysuit On Twitter

Click On Links:
Idaho Would Sue Government Over Health Care Reform ‎
Summary: Health Care Reform Bill H.R. 4872

Health Care Bill Mystery

Obama Admits He Does Not Know What’s In The Health Care Bill

Transcript: Bret Baier Interview With President Obama

Rush Limbaugh: Obama Is Destroying The Ecomomy

Rush Limbaugh Transcript: No, I’m Not Moving to Costa Rica

Democrats Positions On The Healthcare Reform Bill

Health Care Insurance And Health Care Benefits
Obama Forcing His View Of Health Care On America
Summary Of Obama’s Proposal For Health Care Reform
H.R. 3962 Summary
Affordable Health Care For America Act “H.R. 3962″
Obama’s Health Care, A Bad Idea
H.R. 3962 Tax Hikes
The Votes On H.R.3962
Obama Health Reform Lies
US Voters Want Congress To Drop Health
About Emptysuit
Your Opinion

Share

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.